Coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joseph Kletzer, Maximilian Kreibich, Laurin Micek, Albi Fagu, Matthias Eschenhagen, Kilian Franke, Tau Hartikainen, Mirjam Wild, Ulrich Franke, Martin Czerny, Tim Berger
{"title":"Coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Joseph Kletzer, Maximilian Kreibich, Laurin Micek, Albi Fagu, Matthias Eschenhagen, Kilian Franke, Tau Hartikainen, Mirjam Wild, Ulrich Franke, Martin Czerny, Tim Berger","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivag265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The clinical significance of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains debated, particularly regarding long-term mortality, need for repeat revascularization, and the prognostic value of intraoperative graft flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 3,591 patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2005 and 2023 were analyzed and stratified by prior PCI status. Baseline, surgical, and follow-up data were collected, with multivariable regression and interaction analyses performed to investigate associations between prior PCI, reintervention, mortality, and intraoperative graft flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior PCI was not associated with increased mortality after adjustment for clinical and procedural variables (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.861-1.160, p > 0.99), but independently predicted higher rates of repeat coronary reintervention (HR 1.553, 95%CI 1.225-1.969, p < 0.001), especially for recent and urgent PCI (HR 2.304, 95%CI 1.141-4.651, p = 0.020). The prognostic effect of prior PCI was heterogeneous, with adverse outcomes more closely associated in unfavourable coronary anatomy. Importantly, intraoperative graft flow to the right coronary artery was predictive for adverse events only in patients with prior PCI (Interaction p = 0.002; HR 0.424, 95%CI 0.244-0.738 per log2-increment in RCA graft flow within the prior-PCI stratum).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior PCI was not independently associated with increased mortality after CABG but is a predictor of repeat revascularization. The effect is heterogeneous and most pronounced among patients with additional risk factors and reduced right coronary graft flow. These findings underscore the need for individualized risk assessment and tailored perioperative management in CABG patients with a history of PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The clinical significance of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains debated, particularly regarding long-term mortality, need for repeat revascularization, and the prognostic value of intraoperative graft flow.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 3,591 patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2005 and 2023 were analyzed and stratified by prior PCI status. Baseline, surgical, and follow-up data were collected, with multivariable regression and interaction analyses performed to investigate associations between prior PCI, reintervention, mortality, and intraoperative graft flow.

Results: Prior PCI was not associated with increased mortality after adjustment for clinical and procedural variables (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.861-1.160, p > 0.99), but independently predicted higher rates of repeat coronary reintervention (HR 1.553, 95%CI 1.225-1.969, p < 0.001), especially for recent and urgent PCI (HR 2.304, 95%CI 1.141-4.651, p = 0.020). The prognostic effect of prior PCI was heterogeneous, with adverse outcomes more closely associated in unfavourable coronary anatomy. Importantly, intraoperative graft flow to the right coronary artery was predictive for adverse events only in patients with prior PCI (Interaction p = 0.002; HR 0.424, 95%CI 0.244-0.738 per log2-increment in RCA graft flow within the prior-PCI stratum).

Conclusion: Prior PCI was not independently associated with increased mortality after CABG but is a predictor of repeat revascularization. The effect is heterogeneous and most pronounced among patients with additional risk factors and reduced right coronary graft flow. These findings underscore the need for individualized risk assessment and tailored perioperative management in CABG patients with a history of PCI.

既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的预后:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:术前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者中的临床意义仍有争议,特别是关于长期死亡率、重复血运重建的需要以及术中移植物血流的预后价值。方法:在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,对2005年至2023年间接受孤立性冠脉搭桥的3591例患者进行了分析,并根据既往PCI状态进行了分层。收集基线、手术和随访数据,进行多变量回归和相互作用分析,以调查术前PCI、再介入、死亡率和术中移植物流量之间的关系。结果:调整临床和程序变量后,既往PCI与死亡率增加无关(HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.861-1.160, p > 0.99),但独立预测较高的重复冠状动脉再介入率(HR 1.553, 95%CI 1.225-1.969, p)结论:既往PCI与冠脉搭桥后死亡率增加无关,但可预测重复血流量重建。效果是不均匀的,在有其他危险因素和右冠状动脉移植物血流减少的患者中最为明显。这些发现强调了对有PCI病史的CABG患者进行个体化风险评估和量身定制围手术期管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书