Effects of Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular Outcomes Are Consistent Across Sociodemographic Subgroups: A Real-World Analysis From the EMPRISE Study.

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.2337/dca26-0039
Sara J Cromer, Helen Tesfaye, Hanseul Cho, Deborah J Wexler, Janinne Ortega-Montiel, Niklas Schmedt, Christina M Shay, Julie M Paik, Elisabetta Patorno
{"title":"Effects of Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular Outcomes Are Consistent Across Sociodemographic Subgroups: A Real-World Analysis From the EMPRISE Study.","authors":"Sara J Cromer, Helen Tesfaye, Hanseul Cho, Deborah J Wexler, Janinne Ortega-Montiel, Niklas Schmedt, Christina M Shay, Julie M Paik, Elisabetta Patorno","doi":"10.2337/dca26-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to explore the heterogeneity of empagliflozin treatment effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and all-cause mortality (ACM) across sociodemographic and cardiovascular disease (CVD) subgroups of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using 2014-2020 Medicare claims data, we examined rates of MACE (e.g., composite myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality [ACM]), HHF, and ACM among propensity score-matched individuals aged ≥65 years with T2D initiating empagliflozin compared with those prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) and those prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rate differences (IRDs) overall and by age, sex, race or ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and baseline CVD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empagliflozin was associated with decreased risk of MACE (HR 0.77, 99.9% CI [0.69, 0.85]; IRD = -10.3 [-14.1, -6.4]); HHF (HR 0.72 [0.67, 0.79]; IRD = -18.3 [-22.9, -13.6]); and ACM (HR 0.66 [0.57, 0.76]; IRD = -8.6 [-11.4, -5.8]) compared with DPP4is. Effect heterogeneity by baseline CVD was present across all outcomes on the IRD scale but only for HHF on the HR scale. Empagliflozin was also associated with decreased risk of HHF (HR 0.88 [0.81, 0.95]; IRD = -6.9 [-10.8, -3.1]) versus GLP-1RAs, with effect heterogeneity by baseline CVD on the IRD scale. No effect heterogeneity was observed by sociodemographic factors, although a numeric trend suggested greater absolute benefit in patients aged ≥75 years compared with those aged 65-74 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular events across sociodemographic and CVD subgroups compared with both DPP4is and GLP-1RAs, with higher absolute benefits observed in those with prevalent CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dca26-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to explore the heterogeneity of empagliflozin treatment effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and all-cause mortality (ACM) across sociodemographic and cardiovascular disease (CVD) subgroups of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Research design and methods: Using 2014-2020 Medicare claims data, we examined rates of MACE (e.g., composite myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality [ACM]), HHF, and ACM among propensity score-matched individuals aged ≥65 years with T2D initiating empagliflozin compared with those prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) and those prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rate differences (IRDs) overall and by age, sex, race or ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and baseline CVD.

Results: Empagliflozin was associated with decreased risk of MACE (HR 0.77, 99.9% CI [0.69, 0.85]; IRD = -10.3 [-14.1, -6.4]); HHF (HR 0.72 [0.67, 0.79]; IRD = -18.3 [-22.9, -13.6]); and ACM (HR 0.66 [0.57, 0.76]; IRD = -8.6 [-11.4, -5.8]) compared with DPP4is. Effect heterogeneity by baseline CVD was present across all outcomes on the IRD scale but only for HHF on the HR scale. Empagliflozin was also associated with decreased risk of HHF (HR 0.88 [0.81, 0.95]; IRD = -6.9 [-10.8, -3.1]) versus GLP-1RAs, with effect heterogeneity by baseline CVD on the IRD scale. No effect heterogeneity was observed by sociodemographic factors, although a numeric trend suggested greater absolute benefit in patients aged ≥75 years compared with those aged 65-74 years.

Conclusions: Empagliflozin reduced cardiovascular events across sociodemographic and CVD subgroups compared with both DPP4is and GLP-1RAs, with higher absolute benefits observed in those with prevalent CVD.

恩格列净对心血管结局的影响在社会人口亚组中是一致的:来自EMPRISE研究的现实世界分析。
目的:我们旨在探讨恩格列净治疗对2型糖尿病(T2D)成人患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心力衰竭住院(HHF)和全因死亡率(ACM)的异质性。研究设计和方法:使用2014-2020年医疗保险索赔数据,我们检查了倾向评分匹配的≥65岁T2D起始恩格列净患者与处方二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4is)和处方GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)患者的MACE(例如,复合心肌梗死、卒中、全因死亡率[ACM])、HHF和ACM的发生率。我们计算了总体风险比(HRs)和发病率差异(IRDs),并按年龄、性别、种族或民族、社会经济因素和基线CVD计算。结果:恩帕列净与MACE风险降低相关(HR 0.77, 99.9% CI [0.69, 0.85]; IRD = -10.3 [-14.1, -6.4]);超高频(HR 0.72 [0.67, 0.79]; IRD = -18.3 [-22.9, -13.6]);与DPP4is相比,ACM (HR = 0.66 [0.57, 0.76]; IRD = -8.6[-11.4, -5.8])。基线CVD的影响异质性存在于IRD量表的所有结果中,但仅存在于HR量表的HHF。与GLP-1RAs相比,恩格列净也与HHF风险降低相关(HR 0.88 [0.81, 0.95]; IRD = -6.9[-10.8, -3.1]),但IRD量表上基线CVD的影响存在异质性。社会人口学因素没有观察到影响异质性,尽管数字趋势表明≥75岁的患者比65-74岁的患者有更大的绝对获益。结论:与DPP4is和GLP-1RAs相比,恩格列净减少了社会人口统计学和CVD亚组的心血管事件,在流行CVD患者中观察到更高的绝对益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书