Phenotypes of cardiogenic shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the SCAI-V classification.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Roman Roy, Muhamad Abd Razak, Shamika Mohanan, Rupert Simpson, Aleksandra Parczewska, Michael McGarvey, Prajith Jeyaprakash, Hugh Lurcott, Milosz Jaguszewski, Rafal Dworakowski, Jan Bělohlávek, Halvor Langeland, Joachim Düring, Tiziano Cassina, Anders M Grejs, Matt P Wise, Matthias Haenggi, Christian Storm, Niklas Nielsen, Ajay M Shah, Jonathan Byrne, Grigoris V Karamasis, John R Davies, Daniel Stahl, Philip MacCarthy, Josef Dankiewicz, Thomas R Keeble, Nilesh Pareek
{"title":"Phenotypes of cardiogenic shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the SCAI-V classification.","authors":"Roman Roy, Muhamad Abd Razak, Shamika Mohanan, Rupert Simpson, Aleksandra Parczewska, Michael McGarvey, Prajith Jeyaprakash, Hugh Lurcott, Milosz Jaguszewski, Rafal Dworakowski, Jan Bělohlávek, Halvor Langeland, Joachim Düring, Tiziano Cassina, Anders M Grejs, Matt P Wise, Matthias Haenggi, Christian Storm, Niklas Nielsen, Ajay M Shah, Jonathan Byrne, Grigoris V Karamasis, John R Davies, Daniel Stahl, Philip MacCarthy, Josef Dankiewicz, Thomas R Keeble, Nilesh Pareek","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Classifying cardiogenic shock (CS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging, with end-organ hypoperfusion arising from mechanisms distinct to non-arrested CS.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to evaluate the performance of current CS classifications and to develop the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)-V classification of CS after resuscitated OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of an international derivation cohort (London, United Kingdom; GdaÅsk, Poland; n=627) and external validation of the 2x2 SCAI-V construct in the TTM-2 trial cohort (n=1,781). The primary outcome was mortality; the secondary outcome was non-neurological mortality at hospital discharge (derivation cohort) or at 180 days (TTM-2 cohort).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the derivation cohort, the median age was 63 years (interquartile range 53-74), and 76% were male. Applying the 2022 SCAI classification (SCAI-2022), 60% of patients had discordant haemodynamic parameters and lactate levels. We developed the SCAI-V classification, grouping patients according to their SCAI grade (shock absent or present) and lactate level (<5 mmol/L or ≥5 mmol/L) into four phenotypes - non-shock, systemic ischaemia, haemodynamic shock, and haemometabolic shock - using a 2x2 factorial framework. The SCAI-V classification was associated with all-cause and non-neurological mortality (p<0.001). Survival was highest in the non-shock group (78% and 68%, in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively), followed by haemodynamic shock (60% and 51%), then systemic ischaemia (50% and 42%), and lowest in the haemometabolic group (20% and 27%). In the derivation cohort, the SCAI-V classification displayed superior model fit, discrimination, and calibration than the 2019 and 2022 SCAI classifications. In the TTM-2 cohort, external evaluation using SCAI-V showed consistent model fit advantages and discrimination comparable to SCAI-2022.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCAI-V classification enhances phenotypic profiling of CS after resuscitated OHCA and may improve patient selection for early invasive therapies in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"22 18","pages":"e1001-e1012"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13573860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Classifying cardiogenic shock (CS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging, with end-organ hypoperfusion arising from mechanisms distinct to non-arrested CS.

Aims: We sought to evaluate the performance of current CS classifications and to develop the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)-V classification of CS after resuscitated OHCA.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of an international derivation cohort (London, United Kingdom; GdaÅsk, Poland; n=627) and external validation of the 2x2 SCAI-V construct in the TTM-2 trial cohort (n=1,781). The primary outcome was mortality; the secondary outcome was non-neurological mortality at hospital discharge (derivation cohort) or at 180 days (TTM-2 cohort).

Results: In the derivation cohort, the median age was 63 years (interquartile range 53-74), and 76% were male. Applying the 2022 SCAI classification (SCAI-2022), 60% of patients had discordant haemodynamic parameters and lactate levels. We developed the SCAI-V classification, grouping patients according to their SCAI grade (shock absent or present) and lactate level (<5 mmol/L or ≥5 mmol/L) into four phenotypes - non-shock, systemic ischaemia, haemodynamic shock, and haemometabolic shock - using a 2x2 factorial framework. The SCAI-V classification was associated with all-cause and non-neurological mortality (p<0.001). Survival was highest in the non-shock group (78% and 68%, in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively), followed by haemodynamic shock (60% and 51%), then systemic ischaemia (50% and 42%), and lowest in the haemometabolic group (20% and 27%). In the derivation cohort, the SCAI-V classification displayed superior model fit, discrimination, and calibration than the 2019 and 2022 SCAI classifications. In the TTM-2 cohort, external evaluation using SCAI-V showed consistent model fit advantages and discrimination comparable to SCAI-2022.

Conclusions: The SCAI-V classification enhances phenotypic profiling of CS after resuscitated OHCA and may improve patient selection for early invasive therapies in this population.

院外心脏骤停后心源性休克的表型:SCAI-V分类
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后心源性休克(CS)的分类是具有挑战性的,终末器官灌注不足的机制与非骤停CS不同。目的:我们试图评估当前CS分类的性能,并制定心血管血管造影和干预学会(SCAI)-V分类的复苏OHCA后CS。方法:我们对一个国际衍生队列(英国伦敦;GdaÅsk,波兰;n=627)进行了回顾性分析,并在TTM-2试验队列(n= 1781)中对2x2 SCAI-V结构进行了外部验证。主要结局是死亡率;次要终点是出院时(衍生队列)或180天(TTM-2队列)的非神经系统死亡率。结果:在衍生队列中,中位年龄为63岁(四分位数范围为53-74),76%为男性。应用2022 SCAI分类(SCAI-2022), 60%的患者血液动力学参数和乳酸水平不一致。我们开发了SCAI- v分类,根据患者的SCAI等级(无休克或存在)和乳酸水平对患者进行分组(结论:SCAI- v分类增强了复苏OHCA后CS的表型谱,并可能改善患者对早期侵入性治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书