Effects of a Discharge Preparation Program Based on the Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior in Patients Undergoing Laryngeal Cancer Surgery.
{"title":"Effects of a Discharge Preparation Program Based on the Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior in Patients Undergoing Laryngeal Cancer Surgery.","authors":"Xingdan Li, Lin Ye","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Readiness for hospital discharge is critical for rehabilitation outcomes, yet traditional discharge education often fails to meet individualized needs after laryngeal cancer surgery. The Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB) provides a patient-centered framework emphasizing interaction and empowerment, but its application in this population is rarely reported. IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention in patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS This quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled study used convenience sampling to recruit patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital. Sixty-five patients (33 intervention, 32 control) were assigned by admission order. The control group received routine nursing care; the intervention group received an IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention plus routine care. Groups were compared for readiness for hospital discharge, self-management ability, and anxiety/depression before the intervention, at discharge, and 1 month after discharge. Effect sizes and 95% CIs were calculated for key between-group comparisons. RESULTS At discharge, the intervention group had higher readiness-for-discharge scores (99.97±6.31 vs 88.09±6.14; MD=11.88, 95% CI: 8.65-14.71; Cohen's d=1.91), higher self-management ability (174.73±9.35 vs 152.13±12.78; MD=22.60, 95% CI: 17.05-28.15; Cohen's d=2.02), and lower anxiety scores (41.48±2.89 vs 43.19±3.70; MD=-1.71, 95% CI: -3.36 to -0.06; Cohen's d=0.51). One month after discharge, self-management remained higher (189.00 [186.00, 191.50] vs 144.00 [133.00, 154.50]; Mann-Whitney r=0.86), and depression scores were lower (40.73±3.18 vs 46.75±3.09; MD=-6.02, 95% CI: -7.57 to -4.47; Cohen's d=1.92). CONCLUSIONS IMCHB-based discharge preparation was associated with higher readiness for discharge and self-management ability and lower anxiety/depression scores after laryngeal cancer surgery. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13614077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readiness for hospital discharge is critical for rehabilitation outcomes, yet traditional discharge education often fails to meet individualized needs after laryngeal cancer surgery. The Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB) provides a patient-centered framework emphasizing interaction and empowerment, but its application in this population is rarely reported. IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention in patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS This quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled study used convenience sampling to recruit patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital. Sixty-five patients (33 intervention, 32 control) were assigned by admission order. The control group received routine nursing care; the intervention group received an IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention plus routine care. Groups were compared for readiness for hospital discharge, self-management ability, and anxiety/depression before the intervention, at discharge, and 1 month after discharge. Effect sizes and 95% CIs were calculated for key between-group comparisons. RESULTS At discharge, the intervention group had higher readiness-for-discharge scores (99.97±6.31 vs 88.09±6.14; MD=11.88, 95% CI: 8.65-14.71; Cohen's d=1.91), higher self-management ability (174.73±9.35 vs 152.13±12.78; MD=22.60, 95% CI: 17.05-28.15; Cohen's d=2.02), and lower anxiety scores (41.48±2.89 vs 43.19±3.70; MD=-1.71, 95% CI: -3.36 to -0.06; Cohen's d=0.51). One month after discharge, self-management remained higher (189.00 [186.00, 191.50] vs 144.00 [133.00, 154.50]; Mann-Whitney r=0.86), and depression scores were lower (40.73±3.18 vs 46.75±3.09; MD=-6.02, 95% CI: -7.57 to -4.47; Cohen's d=1.92). CONCLUSIONS IMCHB-based discharge preparation was associated with higher readiness for discharge and self-management ability and lower anxiety/depression scores after laryngeal cancer surgery. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness and clinical utility.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.