Effects of a Discharge Preparation Program Based on the Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior in Patients Undergoing Laryngeal Cancer Surgery.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Xingdan Li, Lin Ye
{"title":"Effects of a Discharge Preparation Program Based on the Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior in Patients Undergoing Laryngeal Cancer Surgery.","authors":"Xingdan Li, Lin Ye","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Readiness for hospital discharge is critical for rehabilitation outcomes, yet traditional discharge education often fails to meet individualized needs after laryngeal cancer surgery. The Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB) provides a patient-centered framework emphasizing interaction and empowerment, but its application in this population is rarely reported. IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention in patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS This quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled study used convenience sampling to recruit patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital. Sixty-five patients (33 intervention, 32 control) were assigned by admission order. The control group received routine nursing care; the intervention group received an IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention plus routine care. Groups were compared for readiness for hospital discharge, self-management ability, and anxiety/depression before the intervention, at discharge, and 1 month after discharge. Effect sizes and 95% CIs were calculated for key between-group comparisons. RESULTS At discharge, the intervention group had higher readiness-for-discharge scores (99.97±6.31 vs 88.09±6.14; MD=11.88, 95% CI: 8.65-14.71; Cohen's d=1.91), higher self-management ability (174.73±9.35 vs 152.13±12.78; MD=22.60, 95% CI: 17.05-28.15; Cohen's d=2.02), and lower anxiety scores (41.48±2.89 vs 43.19±3.70; MD=-1.71, 95% CI: -3.36 to -0.06; Cohen's d=0.51). One month after discharge, self-management remained higher (189.00 [186.00, 191.50] vs 144.00 [133.00, 154.50]; Mann-Whitney r=0.86), and depression scores were lower (40.73±3.18 vs 46.75±3.09; MD=-6.02, 95% CI: -7.57 to -4.47; Cohen's d=1.92). CONCLUSIONS IMCHB-based discharge preparation was associated with higher readiness for discharge and self-management ability and lower anxiety/depression scores after laryngeal cancer surgery. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13614077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Readiness for hospital discharge is critical for rehabilitation outcomes, yet traditional discharge education often fails to meet individualized needs after laryngeal cancer surgery. The Cox Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB) provides a patient-centered framework emphasizing interaction and empowerment, but its application in this population is rarely reported. IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention in patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS This quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled study used convenience sampling to recruit patients undergoing laryngeal cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital. Sixty-five patients (33 intervention, 32 control) were assigned by admission order. The control group received routine nursing care; the intervention group received an IMCHB-based discharge preparation intervention plus routine care. Groups were compared for readiness for hospital discharge, self-management ability, and anxiety/depression before the intervention, at discharge, and 1 month after discharge. Effect sizes and 95% CIs were calculated for key between-group comparisons. RESULTS At discharge, the intervention group had higher readiness-for-discharge scores (99.97±6.31 vs 88.09±6.14; MD=11.88, 95% CI: 8.65-14.71; Cohen's d=1.91), higher self-management ability (174.73±9.35 vs 152.13±12.78; MD=22.60, 95% CI: 17.05-28.15; Cohen's d=2.02), and lower anxiety scores (41.48±2.89 vs 43.19±3.70; MD=-1.71, 95% CI: -3.36 to -0.06; Cohen's d=0.51). One month after discharge, self-management remained higher (189.00 [186.00, 191.50] vs 144.00 [133.00, 154.50]; Mann-Whitney r=0.86), and depression scores were lower (40.73±3.18 vs 46.75±3.09; MD=-6.02, 95% CI: -7.57 to -4.47; Cohen's d=1.92). CONCLUSIONS IMCHB-based discharge preparation was associated with higher readiness for discharge and self-management ability and lower anxiety/depression scores after laryngeal cancer surgery. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness and clinical utility.

基于Cox交互模型的喉癌手术患者健康行为出院准备方案的效果
背景:出院准备对康复效果至关重要,然而传统的出院教育往往不能满足喉癌手术后患者的个性化需求。客户健康行为的Cox交互模型(IMCHB)提供了一个以患者为中心的框架,强调交互和授权,但其在这一人群中的应用很少报道。评估基于imchb的喉癌手术患者出院准备干预。材料与方法本准实验、非随机对照研究采用方便抽样方法,招募在三级医院接受喉癌手术的患者。65例患者按入院顺序进行分组,其中干预组33例,对照组32例。对照组患者给予常规护理;干预组接受基于imchb的出院准备干预加常规护理。比较各组在干预前、出院时和出院后1个月的出院准备情况、自我管理能力和焦虑/抑郁。计算关键组间比较的效应量和95% ci。结果出院时,干预组患者出院准备程度评分较高(99.97±6.31 vs 88.09±6.14;MD=11.88, 95% CI: 8.65 ~ 14.71; Cohen’s d=1.91),自我管理能力较高(174.73±9.35 vs 152.13±12.78;MD=22.60, 95% CI: 17.05 ~ 28.15; Cohen’s d=2.02),焦虑评分较低(41.48±2.89 vs 43.19±3.70;MD=-1.71, 95% CI: -3.36 ~ -0.06; Cohen’s d=0.51)。出院1个月后,患者自我管理水平较高(189.00 [186.00,191.50]vs 144.00 [133.00, 154.50]; Mann-Whitney r=0.86),抑郁评分较低(40.73±3.18 vs 46.75±3.09;MD=-6.02, 95% CI: -7.57 ~ -4.47; Cohen’s d=1.92)。结论:基于imchb的出院准备与喉癌手术后更高的出院准备和自我管理能力以及更低的焦虑/抑郁评分相关。这些发现应谨慎解释,并需要随机对照试验来证实其有效性和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书