Pilot Community Health Worker-Based Intervention to Address Social Determinants of Health Among Patients with Diabetes in Ophthalmology.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2026-09-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S632778
Bethel Joy DeGracia, Zainab Rustam, Jose Amezcua Moreno, Sophia E Yu, Diep Tran, Kenya Ferguson, James Wilson, Randi Woods, Cindy X Cai
{"title":"Pilot Community Health Worker-Based Intervention to Address Social Determinants of Health Among Patients with Diabetes in Ophthalmology.","authors":"Bethel Joy DeGracia, Zainab Rustam, Jose Amezcua Moreno, Sophia E Yu, Diep Tran, Kenya Ferguson, James Wilson, Randi Woods, Cindy X Cai","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S632778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Community Health Workers (CHWs) represent a potential strategy in ophthalmology to address adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) and improve vision outcomes. In this study, we explored the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a structured CHW intervention among patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a prospective single-center pilot study conducted at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute. Adult participants (≥ 18 years) with diabetes and at least one adverse SDoH participated in the study. The CHW worked with the participant for on average 6 months to address the social barriers identified at screening. At the conclusion of the study, participants completed a follow-up SDoH survey and a semi-structured exit interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 45 enrolled participants, 23 completed the study (mean age 56 years, 52% female, and 83% non-Hispanic Black). Many participants (83%) were satisfied with the frequency of the meetings, 87% had a positive experience with the CHW and felt respected and supported (74%) throughout the program. The experience with the broader program was more mixed with 17% reporting it was negative, 22% neutral, and 57% positive. Participants found the program helpful for resource education (65%), emotional support (43%), access to medical services (43%), and self-confidence (57%). Challenges included limited resources available to address certain social needs and language barriers among the Spanish speaking participants. Participants reported high trust in CHW, but there were no significant changes in pre- and post-intervention SDoH surveys (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integration of CHWs into ophthalmology is feasible and acceptable among patients with diabetes who remained actively engaged over time. High trust in CHW and improvement in resource navigation, health knowledge, and confidence were reported. Our findings support development of CHW integration in ophthalmology as a potential intervention to address barriers to care and improve vision outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"20 ","pages":"632778"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S632778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Community Health Workers (CHWs) represent a potential strategy in ophthalmology to address adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) and improve vision outcomes. In this study, we explored the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a structured CHW intervention among patients with diabetes.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective single-center pilot study conducted at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute. Adult participants (≥ 18 years) with diabetes and at least one adverse SDoH participated in the study. The CHW worked with the participant for on average 6 months to address the social barriers identified at screening. At the conclusion of the study, participants completed a follow-up SDoH survey and a semi-structured exit interview.

Results: Out of 45 enrolled participants, 23 completed the study (mean age 56 years, 52% female, and 83% non-Hispanic Black). Many participants (83%) were satisfied with the frequency of the meetings, 87% had a positive experience with the CHW and felt respected and supported (74%) throughout the program. The experience with the broader program was more mixed with 17% reporting it was negative, 22% neutral, and 57% positive. Participants found the program helpful for resource education (65%), emotional support (43%), access to medical services (43%), and self-confidence (57%). Challenges included limited resources available to address certain social needs and language barriers among the Spanish speaking participants. Participants reported high trust in CHW, but there were no significant changes in pre- and post-intervention SDoH surveys (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Integration of CHWs into ophthalmology is feasible and acceptable among patients with diabetes who remained actively engaged over time. High trust in CHW and improvement in resource navigation, health knowledge, and confidence were reported. Our findings support development of CHW integration in ophthalmology as a potential intervention to address barriers to care and improve vision outcomes.

试点社区卫生工作者为基础的干预措施,以解决眼科糖尿病患者健康的社会决定因素。
目的:社区卫生工作者(CHWs)代表了眼科解决健康不良社会决定因素(SDoH)和改善视力结果的潜在策略。在本研究中,我们探讨了糖尿病患者结构化CHW干预的可行性、可接受性和影响。材料和方法:这是一项在约翰霍普金斯威尔默眼科研究所进行的前瞻性单中心试点研究。成人糖尿病患者(≥18岁)和至少一个不良SDoH患者参加了这项研究。健康护理中心与参与者平均合作6个月,以解决在筛检时发现的社会障碍。在研究结束时,参与者完成了后续的SDoH调查和半结构化的离职面谈。结果:在45名参与者中,23人完成了研究(平均年龄56岁,52%为女性,83%为非西班牙裔黑人)。许多参与者(83%)对会议的频率感到满意,87%的人对CHW有积极的体验,并且在整个计划中感到受到尊重和支持(74%)。对更广泛的计划的体验则更为复杂,17%的人表示消极,22%的人表示中性,57%的人表示积极。参与者认为该方案有助于资源教育(65%)、情感支持(43%)、获得医疗服务(43%)和自信(57%)。挑战包括解决某些社会需要的可用资源有限以及讲西班牙语的参与者之间的语言障碍。参与者报告了对CHW的高度信任,但在干预前和干预后的SDoH调查中没有显著变化(p>0.05)。结论:对于长期积极参与的糖尿病患者,将CHWs纳入眼科是可行和可接受的。据报道,CHW的信任度较高,资源导航、健康知识和信心都有所改善。我们的研究结果支持在眼科中发展CHW整合,作为解决护理障碍和改善视力结果的潜在干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书