Clément Meier, Verónica Inés Veloso, Bélen Carballo, Vilma A Tripodoro
{"title":"Validation of the Spanish Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale through community-based workshops in Argentina.","authors":"Clément Meier, Verónica Inés Veloso, Bélen Carballo, Vilma A Tripodoro","doi":"10.1017/S147895152610340X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To culturally adapt and validate the Spanish version of the Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale (S-EOL-HLS) through community-based workshops in Argentina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The S-EOL-HLS was translated following the forward-backward method and iteratively refined through community workshops conducted in urban and rural settings. Initial testing took place in 5 workshops (<i>n</i> = 57), followed by face validity assessment by an expert panel (<i>n</i> = 11). Based on this feedback, additional workshops were conducted alongside cognitive interviews, and a subset of participants completed a test-retest assessment. Participants completed the adapted scale and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire. Psychometric evaluation was performed using exploratory factor analysis on the initial sample and confirmatory factor analysis on a second sample (<i>n</i> = 120), together with assessments of internal consistency and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses supported a 3-factor structure representing functional, interactive, and critical dimensions of end-of-life health literacy. Factor loadings ranged from 0.57 to 0.91, with items loading primarily on their intended domains. The model demonstrated acceptable fit and high internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.89). Qualitative feedback from participants and experts improved the clarity and contextual relevance of the Spanish version. While most participants reported ease in understanding technical end-of-life terminology, greater uncertainty was observed for interactive and decision-making items, indicating challenges in applying information to personal treatment choices.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The Spanish S-EOL-HLS demonstrated evidence of content validity, construct validity, and good psychometric performance in an Argentine context. Beyond its measurement properties, the scale also served as a structured prompt for reflection and dialogue in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"e231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152610340X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To culturally adapt and validate the Spanish version of the Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale (S-EOL-HLS) through community-based workshops in Argentina.
Methods: The S-EOL-HLS was translated following the forward-backward method and iteratively refined through community workshops conducted in urban and rural settings. Initial testing took place in 5 workshops (n = 57), followed by face validity assessment by an expert panel (n = 11). Based on this feedback, additional workshops were conducted alongside cognitive interviews, and a subset of participants completed a test-retest assessment. Participants completed the adapted scale and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire. Psychometric evaluation was performed using exploratory factor analysis on the initial sample and confirmatory factor analysis on a second sample (n = 120), together with assessments of internal consistency and construct validity.
Results: The analyses supported a 3-factor structure representing functional, interactive, and critical dimensions of end-of-life health literacy. Factor loadings ranged from 0.57 to 0.91, with items loading primarily on their intended domains. The model demonstrated acceptable fit and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89). Qualitative feedback from participants and experts improved the clarity and contextual relevance of the Spanish version. While most participants reported ease in understanding technical end-of-life terminology, greater uncertainty was observed for interactive and decision-making items, indicating challenges in applying information to personal treatment choices.
Significance of results: The Spanish S-EOL-HLS demonstrated evidence of content validity, construct validity, and good psychometric performance in an Argentine context. Beyond its measurement properties, the scale also served as a structured prompt for reflection and dialogue in community settings.