Validation of the Spanish Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale through community-based workshops in Argentina.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Clément Meier, Verónica Inés Veloso, Bélen Carballo, Vilma A Tripodoro
{"title":"Validation of the Spanish Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale through community-based workshops in Argentina.","authors":"Clément Meier, Verónica Inés Veloso, Bélen Carballo, Vilma A Tripodoro","doi":"10.1017/S147895152610340X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To culturally adapt and validate the Spanish version of the Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale (S-EOL-HLS) through community-based workshops in Argentina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The S-EOL-HLS was translated following the forward-backward method and iteratively refined through community workshops conducted in urban and rural settings. Initial testing took place in 5 workshops (<i>n</i> = 57), followed by face validity assessment by an expert panel (<i>n</i> = 11). Based on this feedback, additional workshops were conducted alongside cognitive interviews, and a subset of participants completed a test-retest assessment. Participants completed the adapted scale and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire. Psychometric evaluation was performed using exploratory factor analysis on the initial sample and confirmatory factor analysis on a second sample (<i>n</i> = 120), together with assessments of internal consistency and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses supported a 3-factor structure representing functional, interactive, and critical dimensions of end-of-life health literacy. Factor loadings ranged from 0.57 to 0.91, with items loading primarily on their intended domains. The model demonstrated acceptable fit and high internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.89). Qualitative feedback from participants and experts improved the clarity and contextual relevance of the Spanish version. While most participants reported ease in understanding technical end-of-life terminology, greater uncertainty was observed for interactive and decision-making items, indicating challenges in applying information to personal treatment choices.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The Spanish S-EOL-HLS demonstrated evidence of content validity, construct validity, and good psychometric performance in an Argentine context. Beyond its measurement properties, the scale also served as a structured prompt for reflection and dialogue in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"e231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152610340X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To culturally adapt and validate the Spanish version of the Subjective End-of-Life Health Literacy Scale (S-EOL-HLS) through community-based workshops in Argentina.

Methods: The S-EOL-HLS was translated following the forward-backward method and iteratively refined through community workshops conducted in urban and rural settings. Initial testing took place in 5 workshops (n = 57), followed by face validity assessment by an expert panel (n = 11). Based on this feedback, additional workshops were conducted alongside cognitive interviews, and a subset of participants completed a test-retest assessment. Participants completed the adapted scale and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire. Psychometric evaluation was performed using exploratory factor analysis on the initial sample and confirmatory factor analysis on a second sample (n = 120), together with assessments of internal consistency and construct validity.

Results: The analyses supported a 3-factor structure representing functional, interactive, and critical dimensions of end-of-life health literacy. Factor loadings ranged from 0.57 to 0.91, with items loading primarily on their intended domains. The model demonstrated acceptable fit and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89). Qualitative feedback from participants and experts improved the clarity and contextual relevance of the Spanish version. While most participants reported ease in understanding technical end-of-life terminology, greater uncertainty was observed for interactive and decision-making items, indicating challenges in applying information to personal treatment choices.

Significance of results: The Spanish S-EOL-HLS demonstrated evidence of content validity, construct validity, and good psychometric performance in an Argentine context. Beyond its measurement properties, the scale also served as a structured prompt for reflection and dialogue in community settings.

通过阿根廷社区讲习班验证西班牙主观临终健康素养量表。
目的:通过阿根廷社区讲习班,在文化上适应和验证西班牙语版主观临终健康素养量表(S-EOL-HLS)。方法:采用前向-后向法对S-EOL-HLS进行翻译,并通过在城市和农村举办的社区研讨会进行迭代改进。初步测试在5个车间进行(n = 57),随后由专家小组进行面部效度评估(n = 11)。根据这些反馈,在认知访谈的基础上进行了额外的研讨会,一部分参与者完成了测试-重测试评估。参与者完成了调整后的量表和简短的社会人口调查问卷。对初始样本进行探索性因子分析,对第二样本(n = 120)进行验证性因子分析,并对内部一致性和结构效度进行评估。结果:分析支持一个三因素结构,代表了临终健康素养的功能、互动和关键维度。因子加载范围从0.57到0.91,项目加载主要在其预期的领域。模型拟合良好,内部一致性高(Cronbach’s α = 0.89)。与会者和专家的定性反馈提高了西班牙语版本的清晰度和上下文相关性。虽然大多数参与者报告易于理解技术临终术语,但在互动和决策项目中观察到更大的不确定性,这表明在将信息应用于个人治疗选择方面存在挑战。结果的显著性:西班牙S-EOL-HLS在阿根廷背景下表现出内容效度、结构效度和良好的心理测量表现。除了其测量属性,该量表还作为社区环境中反思和对话的结构化提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书