Christopher Z Wen, Elizabeth Lee, Charlyn N Gomez, Marcelina Puc, Danielle S Powell, David J Eisenman, Adam C Kaufman
{"title":"Socioeconomic and Demographic Trends of Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Use Sign Language: A National Database Analysis.","authors":"Christopher Z Wen, Elizabeth Lee, Charlyn N Gomez, Marcelina Puc, Danielle S Powell, David J Eisenman, Adam C Kaufman","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine how the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of American Sign Language (ASL)-communicating people with cochlear implants differ from those of the broader cochlear implant (CI) recipient population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we identified 39,111 patients receiving CIs between 2015 and 2024 using the Epic Cosmos database. Of those, 1,070 (2.7%) people with cochlear implants indicated ASL as their preferred language. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and two-sample <i>t</i> tests compared differences between ASL communicators and noncommunicators in terms of age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, explantation, socioeconomic status (SES)/social vulnerability index (SVI), and urban/rural categories. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between these variables and explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pediatric ASL communicators were significantly older than pediatric noncommunicators, whereas adult ASL users were younger. Female (<i>OR</i> = 1.33), Hispanic (<i>OR</i> = 2.51), and urban (<i>OR</i> = 1.65) patients had increased odds of communicating with ASL. ASL users were more likely to be in the most vulnerable SES (<i>OR</i> = 1.69) and SVI (<i>OR</i> = 1.71) groups and undergo explantation (<i>OR</i> = 2.41). Multivariate analysis identified ASL (<i>OR</i> = 2.55) as the main associated variable with explantation. Pediatric patients were also associated with increased odds of being explanted (<i>OR</i> = 1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are socioeconomic and demographic differences between Deaf people with cochlear implants and the general CI recipient population. Deaf identity may intersect with health considerations such as CI explantation, highlighting the need for culturally informed approaches to patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine how the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of American Sign Language (ASL)-communicating people with cochlear implants differ from those of the broader cochlear implant (CI) recipient population.
Method: In this cross-sectional study, we identified 39,111 patients receiving CIs between 2015 and 2024 using the Epic Cosmos database. Of those, 1,070 (2.7%) people with cochlear implants indicated ASL as their preferred language. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and two-sample t tests compared differences between ASL communicators and noncommunicators in terms of age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, explantation, socioeconomic status (SES)/social vulnerability index (SVI), and urban/rural categories. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between these variables and explantation.
Results: Pediatric ASL communicators were significantly older than pediatric noncommunicators, whereas adult ASL users were younger. Female (OR = 1.33), Hispanic (OR = 2.51), and urban (OR = 1.65) patients had increased odds of communicating with ASL. ASL users were more likely to be in the most vulnerable SES (OR = 1.69) and SVI (OR = 1.71) groups and undergo explantation (OR = 2.41). Multivariate analysis identified ASL (OR = 2.55) as the main associated variable with explantation. Pediatric patients were also associated with increased odds of being explanted (OR = 1.31).
Conclusions: There are socioeconomic and demographic differences between Deaf people with cochlear implants and the general CI recipient population. Deaf identity may intersect with health considerations such as CI explantation, highlighting the need for culturally informed approaches to patient care.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.