Socioeconomic and Demographic Trends of Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Use Sign Language: A National Database Analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Christopher Z Wen, Elizabeth Lee, Charlyn N Gomez, Marcelina Puc, Danielle S Powell, David J Eisenman, Adam C Kaufman
{"title":"Socioeconomic and Demographic Trends of Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Use Sign Language: A National Database Analysis.","authors":"Christopher Z Wen, Elizabeth Lee, Charlyn N Gomez, Marcelina Puc, Danielle S Powell, David J Eisenman, Adam C Kaufman","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine how the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of American Sign Language (ASL)-communicating people with cochlear implants differ from those of the broader cochlear implant (CI) recipient population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we identified 39,111 patients receiving CIs between 2015 and 2024 using the Epic Cosmos database. Of those, 1,070 (2.7%) people with cochlear implants indicated ASL as their preferred language. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and two-sample <i>t</i> tests compared differences between ASL communicators and noncommunicators in terms of age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, explantation, socioeconomic status (SES)/social vulnerability index (SVI), and urban/rural categories. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between these variables and explantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pediatric ASL communicators were significantly older than pediatric noncommunicators, whereas adult ASL users were younger. Female (<i>OR</i> = 1.33), Hispanic (<i>OR</i> = 2.51), and urban (<i>OR</i> = 1.65) patients had increased odds of communicating with ASL. ASL users were more likely to be in the most vulnerable SES (<i>OR</i> = 1.69) and SVI (<i>OR</i> = 1.71) groups and undergo explantation (<i>OR</i> = 2.41). Multivariate analysis identified ASL (<i>OR</i> = 2.55) as the main associated variable with explantation. Pediatric patients were also associated with increased odds of being explanted (<i>OR</i> = 1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are socioeconomic and demographic differences between Deaf people with cochlear implants and the general CI recipient population. Deaf identity may intersect with health considerations such as CI explantation, highlighting the need for culturally informed approaches to patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine how the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of American Sign Language (ASL)-communicating people with cochlear implants differ from those of the broader cochlear implant (CI) recipient population.

Method: In this cross-sectional study, we identified 39,111 patients receiving CIs between 2015 and 2024 using the Epic Cosmos database. Of those, 1,070 (2.7%) people with cochlear implants indicated ASL as their preferred language. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and two-sample t tests compared differences between ASL communicators and noncommunicators in terms of age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, explantation, socioeconomic status (SES)/social vulnerability index (SVI), and urban/rural categories. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between these variables and explantation.

Results: Pediatric ASL communicators were significantly older than pediatric noncommunicators, whereas adult ASL users were younger. Female (OR = 1.33), Hispanic (OR = 2.51), and urban (OR = 1.65) patients had increased odds of communicating with ASL. ASL users were more likely to be in the most vulnerable SES (OR = 1.69) and SVI (OR = 1.71) groups and undergo explantation (OR = 2.41). Multivariate analysis identified ASL (OR = 2.55) as the main associated variable with explantation. Pediatric patients were also associated with increased odds of being explanted (OR = 1.31).

Conclusions: There are socioeconomic and demographic differences between Deaf people with cochlear implants and the general CI recipient population. Deaf identity may intersect with health considerations such as CI explantation, highlighting the need for culturally informed approaches to patient care.

使用手语的人工耳蜗受者的社会经济和人口趋势:一个国家数据库分析。
目的:本研究的目的是研究美国手语(ASL)人工耳蜗交流人群的社会经济和人口统计学特征与更广泛的人工耳蜗(CI)接受者人群的不同之处。方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们使用Epic Cosmos数据库确定了2015年至2024年间接受CIs的39111例患者。其中,1070名(2.7%)人工耳蜗患者表示美国手语是他们的首选语言。卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和双样本t检验比较了美国手语交流者和非美国手语交流者在年龄、性别、种族、民族、保险、外因、社会经济地位(SES)/社会脆弱性指数(SVI)和城市/农村类别方面的差异。单变量和多变量分析评估了这些变量与外植之间的关系。结果:儿童ASL交流者明显比儿童非交流者年龄大,而成人ASL使用者年龄小。女性(OR = 1.33)、西班牙裔(OR = 2.51)和城市(OR = 1.65)患者与ASL沟通的几率增加。ASL使用者更有可能处于最脆弱的SES (OR = 1.69)和SVI (OR = 1.71)组,并接受外植(OR = 2.41)。多变量分析发现ASL (OR = 2.55)是外植的主要相关变量。儿科患者被移植的几率也增加(OR = 1.31)。结论:植入人工耳蜗的聋人与接受人工耳蜗的人群在社会经济和人口统计学上存在差异。聋人身份可能与CI外植术等健康考虑相交叉,突出了对患者护理采取文化知情方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书