Trust in context: Examining cognitive control in trust decisions.

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emotion Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1037/emo0001741
Rebecca Kazinka, Angus W MacDonald
{"title":"Trust in context: Examining cognitive control in trust decisions.","authors":"Rebecca Kazinka, Angus W MacDonald","doi":"10.1037/emo0001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social trust is a key component to relationships between individuals and within communities. Failure to correctly choose to trust or not can have significant consequences in interpersonal relationships, employment, and more. While work has identified cognitive and affective processes relevant to trust, relatively less has examined the role of cognitive control during trust decisions and its interaction with affective processing. This study modifies an expectancy AX task to incorporate trusting behavior in two ways: first by establishing the trust component in a similar framework as AX variants and then by adding an emotional distractor during the paradigm. We conducted a between-subjects analysis of task performance on undergraduates (<i>n</i> = 262) in 2017-2018 to examine the efficacy of the new variant, the effect of an emotional distractor on task performance, and individual difference effects related to social trust. We found that the Trust-AX paradigm provided performance patterns consistent with proactive control of trust decisions. Adding a distractor decreased proactive control as the distractor increased in emotional salience. Last, individuals who had greater social distrust also performed worse on proactive control, suggesting a potential shared mechanism with cognitive control in trust decisions. The Trust-AX paradigm may be a useful measure to examine cognitive control during trust and provide insights into how \"cold\" cognitive processes interact with affective processes to influence trust. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social trust is a key component to relationships between individuals and within communities. Failure to correctly choose to trust or not can have significant consequences in interpersonal relationships, employment, and more. While work has identified cognitive and affective processes relevant to trust, relatively less has examined the role of cognitive control during trust decisions and its interaction with affective processing. This study modifies an expectancy AX task to incorporate trusting behavior in two ways: first by establishing the trust component in a similar framework as AX variants and then by adding an emotional distractor during the paradigm. We conducted a between-subjects analysis of task performance on undergraduates (n = 262) in 2017-2018 to examine the efficacy of the new variant, the effect of an emotional distractor on task performance, and individual difference effects related to social trust. We found that the Trust-AX paradigm provided performance patterns consistent with proactive control of trust decisions. Adding a distractor decreased proactive control as the distractor increased in emotional salience. Last, individuals who had greater social distrust also performed worse on proactive control, suggesting a potential shared mechanism with cognitive control in trust decisions. The Trust-AX paradigm may be a useful measure to examine cognitive control during trust and provide insights into how "cold" cognitive processes interact with affective processes to influence trust. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

情境中的信任:信任决策中的认知控制。
社会信任是个人和社区内关系的关键组成部分。如果不能正确地选择信任或不信任,会对人际关系、就业等产生重大影响。虽然工作已经确定了与信任相关的认知和情感过程,但相对较少的研究是在信任决策过程中认知控制的作用及其与情感处理的相互作用。本研究通过两种方式修改期望AX任务以纳入信任行为:首先通过在与AX变体相似的框架中建立信任成分,然后在范式中添加情绪干扰因素。我们对2017-2018年262名大学生的任务绩效进行了被试间分析,以检验新变体的有效性、情绪干扰因素对任务绩效的影响以及与社会信任相关的个体差异效应。我们发现trust - ax范式提供了与信任决策的主动控制一致的性能模式。随着干扰物情绪显著性的增加,增加干扰物会降低主动控制。最后,社会不信任程度较高的个体在主动控制方面的表现也较差,这表明在信任决策中存在与认知控制的潜在共享机制。信任- ax范式可能是检验信任过程中的认知控制的有用措施,并提供对“冷”认知过程如何与情感过程相互作用以影响信任的见解。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书