[Correlation Between Landscape Pattern and Ecosystem Services and Optimization Strategies in Zoige National Park].

Q2 Environmental Science
Jia-Jing Li, Xiao-Yu Gan, Xin-Yuan Bi, Jia-Jia Liu, Zhuo-Ting Jiang, Ao Kang
{"title":"[Correlation Between Landscape Pattern and Ecosystem Services and Optimization Strategies in Zoige National Park].","authors":"Jia-Jing Li, Xiao-Yu Gan, Xin-Yuan Bi, Jia-Jia Liu, Zhuo-Ting Jiang, Ao Kang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202506264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhancing ecosystem services (ES) in national parks is essential for maintaining ecosystem sustainability, and landscape pattern (LP) plays a key role in this. Existing studies have mostly focused on the spatial impact of LP on ES, while the correlation between the intensity of this impact and the size of ES remains unclear, which may lead to the mismatch of policy interventions and ineffective investment of costs. Taking Zoige National Park as an example, combining the ES evaluation method, correlation analysis method, and constraint line method, we comprehensively analyze the dynamic change characteristics of LP and ES [annual water yield (AWY), soil conservation (SC), habitat quality (HQ), and carbon storage (CS)] in the study area from 2000 to 2020 and explore the impact of LP on ES based on the data in 2020. Finally, by identifying the correlation between the intensity of LP's impact on ES and the size of ES, LP optimization strategies were proposed to promote the effective and efficient enhancement of ES. The results show that: ① The overall levels of AWY and SC were high and obvious, the growth rate of CS decreased, and HQ showed a trend of degradation. ② The landscape fragmentation in the study area increased, and the dominance of grassland and wetland patches decreased. ③ The four types of ES in the study area were affected by the nine types of LP indices to varying degrees, with the western and northern areas being affected the most. ④ The strength of LP's impacts on ES had a threshold effect on the ES size; and the constraint lines were primarily concave wave-shaped, exponential, and positive U-shaped. When AWY and CS increased, the influence intensity decreased and then increased, while HQ and SC showed the opposite. In summary, it can be seen that optimizing LP in the study area can effectively enhance ES, but it is necessary to comprehensively consider the intensity of LP's influence on ES and its correlation with ES size to achieve significant enhancement results. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for the prioritization of ecological restoration in national parks.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"47 9","pages":"6377-6391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202506264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing ecosystem services (ES) in national parks is essential for maintaining ecosystem sustainability, and landscape pattern (LP) plays a key role in this. Existing studies have mostly focused on the spatial impact of LP on ES, while the correlation between the intensity of this impact and the size of ES remains unclear, which may lead to the mismatch of policy interventions and ineffective investment of costs. Taking Zoige National Park as an example, combining the ES evaluation method, correlation analysis method, and constraint line method, we comprehensively analyze the dynamic change characteristics of LP and ES [annual water yield (AWY), soil conservation (SC), habitat quality (HQ), and carbon storage (CS)] in the study area from 2000 to 2020 and explore the impact of LP on ES based on the data in 2020. Finally, by identifying the correlation between the intensity of LP's impact on ES and the size of ES, LP optimization strategies were proposed to promote the effective and efficient enhancement of ES. The results show that: ① The overall levels of AWY and SC were high and obvious, the growth rate of CS decreased, and HQ showed a trend of degradation. ② The landscape fragmentation in the study area increased, and the dominance of grassland and wetland patches decreased. ③ The four types of ES in the study area were affected by the nine types of LP indices to varying degrees, with the western and northern areas being affected the most. ④ The strength of LP's impacts on ES had a threshold effect on the ES size; and the constraint lines were primarily concave wave-shaped, exponential, and positive U-shaped. When AWY and CS increased, the influence intensity decreased and then increased, while HQ and SC showed the opposite. In summary, it can be seen that optimizing LP in the study area can effectively enhance ES, but it is necessary to comprehensively consider the intensity of LP's influence on ES and its correlation with ES size to achieve significant enhancement results. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for the prioritization of ecological restoration in national parks.

若尔盖国家公园景观格局与生态系统服务的相关性及优化策略
加强国家公园生态系统服务是维持生态系统可持续性的关键,而景观格局在其中起着关键作用。现有研究多集中于低成本对生态系统的空间影响,而这种影响的强度与生态系统规模之间的相关性尚不明确,这可能导致政策干预的错配和成本的无效投入。以若尔盖国家公园为例,结合ES评价方法、相关分析法和约束线法,综合分析研究区2000 - 2020年LP和ES[年产水量(AWY)、土壤保持性(SC)、生境质量(HQ)和碳储量(CS)]的动态变化特征,并基于2020年数据探讨LP对ES的影响。最后,通过识别LP对ES的影响强度与ES规模之间的相关性,提出LP优化策略,以促进ES的有效和高效增强。结果表明:①AWY和SC总体水平高且明显,CS生长速度下降,HQ呈退化趋势;②研究区景观破碎化程度增加,草地和湿地斑块的优势度下降。③研究区4种ES均不同程度地受到9种LP指数的影响,其中西部和北部地区受影响最大。④LP对ES的影响强度对ES的大小存在阈值效应,约束线主要为凹波浪型、指数型和正u型。随着AWY和CS的增加,影响强度先减小后增大,HQ和SC则相反。综上所述,优化研究区LP可以有效增强ES,但需要综合考虑LP对ES的影响强度及其与ES大小的相关性,才能取得显著的增强效果。研究结果为国家公园生态修复的优先排序提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书