Designing ethical AI literacy across secondary to graduate STEM pathways: ensuring cross-disciplinary outcomes and workforce alignment.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Taylor Lightner, Malle Schilling, Whitney Hansberry, Sakib Hussen, Abdul Siam, Verónica A Segarra
{"title":"Designing ethical AI literacy across secondary to graduate STEM pathways: ensuring cross-disciplinary outcomes and workforce alignment.","authors":"Taylor Lightner, Malle Schilling, Whitney Hansberry, Sakib Hussen, Abdul Siam, Verónica A Segarra","doi":"10.1128/jmbe.00351-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid adoption of generative AI in STEM courses has created an urgent need for practical, ethical AI literacy that students can carry from high school into college and beyond. In this Perspective, we make the case for a cross-disciplinary approach to AI literacy and present a skills progression table that aligns core outcomes with typical academic and professional levels (high school, early undergraduate, advanced undergraduate, graduate, and workplace). We focus on six core areas: (i) attribution and citation, (ii) bias awareness and mitigation, (iii) privacy and data handling, (iv) safety and environmental care, (v) community impact and fairness, and (vi) compliance and readiness for audit. We frame AI-related classroom practice as a balancing act, on one side, clear benefits (faster drafting, coding support, and broader access), and on the other, real risks (bias, privacy leaks, over-reliance, and academic integrity concerns). To ground our Perspective in STEM broadly, we offer guidance with suggested steps and actions, grading cues, rural/low-bandwidth adaptations, and links to workforce expectations. We also note concrete examples from biology, engineering, and computer science to show both shared core practices and discipline-specific needs. As we look into the future, we highlight the role of professional societies as conveners to ensure alignment of guidance across disciplines and keep materials current. Our goal is to provide instructors with practical materials they can adopt, while building a living framework that evolves with evidence, standards, and stakeholder input.</p>","PeriodicalId":46416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education","volume":" ","pages":"e0035125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00351-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid adoption of generative AI in STEM courses has created an urgent need for practical, ethical AI literacy that students can carry from high school into college and beyond. In this Perspective, we make the case for a cross-disciplinary approach to AI literacy and present a skills progression table that aligns core outcomes with typical academic and professional levels (high school, early undergraduate, advanced undergraduate, graduate, and workplace). We focus on six core areas: (i) attribution and citation, (ii) bias awareness and mitigation, (iii) privacy and data handling, (iv) safety and environmental care, (v) community impact and fairness, and (vi) compliance and readiness for audit. We frame AI-related classroom practice as a balancing act, on one side, clear benefits (faster drafting, coding support, and broader access), and on the other, real risks (bias, privacy leaks, over-reliance, and academic integrity concerns). To ground our Perspective in STEM broadly, we offer guidance with suggested steps and actions, grading cues, rural/low-bandwidth adaptations, and links to workforce expectations. We also note concrete examples from biology, engineering, and computer science to show both shared core practices and discipline-specific needs. As we look into the future, we highlight the role of professional societies as conveners to ensure alignment of guidance across disciplines and keep materials current. Our goal is to provide instructors with practical materials they can adopt, while building a living framework that evolves with evidence, standards, and stakeholder input.

在中学到研究生的STEM路径中设计道德人工智能素养:确保跨学科成果和劳动力一致性。
在STEM课程中迅速采用生成式人工智能,迫切需要学生从高中到大学乃至大学都能掌握的实用、道德的人工智能素养。在这个视角中,我们提出了一种跨学科的人工智能素养方法,并提出了一个技能进阶表,将核心成果与典型的学术和专业水平(高中、本科早期、本科高级、研究生和工作场所)相结合。我们专注于六个核心领域:(i)归因和引用,(ii)偏见意识和缓解,(iii)隐私和数据处理,(iv)安全和环境保护,(v)社区影响和公平,以及(vi)合规性和审计准备。我们将人工智能相关的课堂实践视为一种平衡行为,一方面有明显的好处(更快的起草、编码支持和更广泛的访问),另一方面有实际的风险(偏见、隐私泄露、过度依赖和学术诚信问题)。为了使我们的观点更广泛地扎根于STEM,我们提供了建议步骤和行动的指导,评分线索,农村/低带宽适应以及与劳动力期望的联系。我们还注意到来自生物学、工程学和计算机科学的具体例子,以显示共享的核心实践和学科特定需求。展望未来,我们强调专业协会作为召集人的作用,以确保跨学科指导的一致性,并保持材料的最新状态。我们的目标是为教师提供他们可以采用的实用材料,同时建立一个活生生的框架,随着证据、标准和利益相关者的投入而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
26.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书