How should we teach psychiatric formulation? A systematic review of the evidence.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Giulia Ferrari, Gareth Knott, Gareth Owen
{"title":"How should we teach psychiatric formulation? A systematic review of the evidence.","authors":"Giulia Ferrari, Gareth Knott, Gareth Owen","doi":"10.1017/S0033291726105601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review of literature on teaching psychiatric formulation with the aim of reflecting on the findings and proposing recommendations for enhancing formulation pedagogy within psychiatric education. We found categories of publication on formulation tools, educational strategies, and evaluation of outcomes with little continuity between them. Fourteen themes were identified that helped to understand the gaps in the evidence and the unresolved issues of conceptualization. Our review revealed a striking paradox: despite widespread agreement on the centrality of formulation as a core clinical competency in psychiatry, how to teach it remains fragmented, methodologically weak, and conceptually inconsistent. Based on the findings we propose eight recommendations to aid advance in the research of teaching psychiatric formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"56 ","pages":"e286"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291726105601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of literature on teaching psychiatric formulation with the aim of reflecting on the findings and proposing recommendations for enhancing formulation pedagogy within psychiatric education. We found categories of publication on formulation tools, educational strategies, and evaluation of outcomes with little continuity between them. Fourteen themes were identified that helped to understand the gaps in the evidence and the unresolved issues of conceptualization. Our review revealed a striking paradox: despite widespread agreement on the centrality of formulation as a core clinical competency in psychiatry, how to teach it remains fragmented, methodologically weak, and conceptually inconsistent. Based on the findings we propose eight recommendations to aid advance in the research of teaching psychiatric formulation.

我们应该如何教授精神病学公式?对证据的系统回顾。
我们对精神病学提法教学的文献进行了系统的回顾,目的是反思研究结果,并提出在精神病学教育中加强提法教学法的建议。我们发现关于制定工具、教育策略和结果评估的出版物类别之间几乎没有连续性。确定了14个主题,有助于了解证据方面的差距和概念化方面尚未解决的问题。我们的回顾揭示了一个惊人的悖论:尽管人们普遍认为,提法是精神病学核心临床能力的核心,但如何教授它仍然是支离破碎的,方法上薄弱的,概念上不一致的。在此基础上,我们提出了八项建议,以促进精神病学提法教学的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书