[Evaluation of the Synergistic Effects of Air Pollutant and Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Xi'an's Road Traffic].

Q2 Environmental Science
Ning Li, Yan-Zhao Hao, Jie Sheng, Ju-Xiao Zhang
{"title":"[Evaluation of the Synergistic Effects of Air Pollutant and Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Xi'an's Road Traffic].","authors":"Ning Li, Yan-Zhao Hao, Jie Sheng, Ju-Xiao Zhang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202507075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on the long-range energy alternative planning system (LEAP), a carbon and pollutant emission model for Xi'an's road traffic from 2022 to 2050 was constructed, which incorporates both direct and indirect emissions. The model estimated the carbon and pollutant emission reductions under different scenario measures, and the synergistic emission reduction effects of each scenario were evaluated using the emission reduction elasticity coefficient (ELS) method. The scenario settings include seven single-measure scenarios, one comprehensive measure scenario (SA), and an additional combined measure scenario (CS) specifically designed for the regulation of new energy vehicles. The results show that all single measures exhibited positive synergistic control effects. Among them, the co-benefit of CO<sub>2</sub>e-PM<sub>2.5</sub> was the most significant, followed by that of CO<sub>2</sub>e-CO. However, the intensity of CO<sub>2</sub>e reduction was generally higher than that of NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> and VOC. Specifically, the scenario of technology improvement for fuel vehicles (S6) had excellent pollution and carbon reduction capabilities; the scenario of low-carbon travel (S1) stood out in carbon reduction; the scenario of road-to-rail shift for freight transport (S2) significantly cut NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> emissions; and the scenario of low vehicle saturation (S7) notably reduced VOC, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and CO emissions. Single measures for new energy vehicles have limited pollution and carbon reduction effects, and comprehensive management measures are needed to further unleash their emission reduction benefits. The CS scenario showed significant co-benefits for CO<sub>2</sub>e-PM<sub>2.5</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>e-CO; its NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> reduction effect was weaker than that of CO<sub>2</sub>e, while its VOC reduction was stronger. The SA scenario demonstrated the most remarkable emission reduction potential, with annual CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions decreasing by 1.22%; NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> emissions ultimately reduced by nearly 50%; and VOC, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and CO emissions reduced by over 70%. Its ELS values generally fluctuated around 1, indicating that the scenario setting was reasonable, and synergistic control of carbon and pollution had been achieved. Additionally, the rebound of NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> emissions in the later stage of the SA scenario highlights insufficient control over diesel trucks by existing measures. Future efforts should focus on in-depth emission reductions through multiple approaches like refined supervision, post-treatment technology improvement, and clean energy transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"47 9","pages":"6038-6046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202507075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the long-range energy alternative planning system (LEAP), a carbon and pollutant emission model for Xi'an's road traffic from 2022 to 2050 was constructed, which incorporates both direct and indirect emissions. The model estimated the carbon and pollutant emission reductions under different scenario measures, and the synergistic emission reduction effects of each scenario were evaluated using the emission reduction elasticity coefficient (ELS) method. The scenario settings include seven single-measure scenarios, one comprehensive measure scenario (SA), and an additional combined measure scenario (CS) specifically designed for the regulation of new energy vehicles. The results show that all single measures exhibited positive synergistic control effects. Among them, the co-benefit of CO2e-PM2.5 was the most significant, followed by that of CO2e-CO. However, the intensity of CO2e reduction was generally higher than that of NOx and VOC. Specifically, the scenario of technology improvement for fuel vehicles (S6) had excellent pollution and carbon reduction capabilities; the scenario of low-carbon travel (S1) stood out in carbon reduction; the scenario of road-to-rail shift for freight transport (S2) significantly cut NOx emissions; and the scenario of low vehicle saturation (S7) notably reduced VOC, PM2.5, and CO emissions. Single measures for new energy vehicles have limited pollution and carbon reduction effects, and comprehensive management measures are needed to further unleash their emission reduction benefits. The CS scenario showed significant co-benefits for CO2e-PM2.5 and CO2e-CO; its NOx reduction effect was weaker than that of CO2e, while its VOC reduction was stronger. The SA scenario demonstrated the most remarkable emission reduction potential, with annual CO2e emissions decreasing by 1.22%; NOx emissions ultimately reduced by nearly 50%; and VOC, PM2.5, and CO emissions reduced by over 70%. Its ELS values generally fluctuated around 1, indicating that the scenario setting was reasonable, and synergistic control of carbon and pollution had been achieved. Additionally, the rebound of NOx emissions in the later stage of the SA scenario highlights insufficient control over diesel trucks by existing measures. Future efforts should focus on in-depth emission reductions through multiple approaches like refined supervision, post-treatment technology improvement, and clean energy transition.

[西安市道路交通大气污染物与碳减排策略协同效应评价]。
基于长期能源替代规划系统(LEAP),构建了西安市2022 - 2050年道路交通碳和污染物排放模型,该模型包含了直接排放和间接排放。该模型估算了不同情景措施下的碳减排和污染物减排,并利用减排弹性系数(ELS)方法对各情景的协同减排效果进行了评价。场景设置包括7个单一措施场景、1个综合措施场景(SA)和一个针对新能源汽车监管的附加组合措施场景(CS)。结果表明,各单项措施均表现出正向的协同防治效果。其中,co2 - pm2.5的协同效益最为显著,其次是co2 - co。但CO2e的减排强度普遍高于NOx和VOC。其中,燃油车技术改进情景(S6)具有优异的污染和碳减排能力,低碳出行情景(S1)在碳减排方面表现突出,货运公路转轨道情景(S2)显著降低NOx排放,低车辆饱和度情景(S7)显著降低VOC、PM2.5和CO排放。单一措施对新能源汽车的污染减排和减碳效果有限,需要综合管理措施进一步释放其减排效益。CS情景对co2 - pm2.5和co2 - co具有显著的协同效益,其对NOx的减排效果弱于CO2e,而对VOC的减排效果强于CO2e。SA情景的减排潜力最为显著,年CO2e排放量减少1.22%,NOx排放量最终减少近50%,VOC、PM2.5和CO排放量减少超过70%。其ELS值一般在1左右波动,说明情景设置合理,实现了碳和污染的协同控制。此外,在SA方案的后期阶段,氮氧化物排放量的反弹凸显了现有措施对柴油卡车的控制不足。今后应通过精细化监管、后处理技术改进、清洁能源转型等多种途径,着力推进深度减排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书