Temporal dynamics of affect, screen time, and step count in individuals at risk for mood disorders.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Fleur Helmink, Eeske van Roekel, Manon Hillegers, Esther Mesman, Sarah Sperry
{"title":"Temporal dynamics of affect, screen time, and step count in individuals at risk for mood disorders.","authors":"Fleur Helmink, Eeske van Roekel, Manon Hillegers, Esther Mesman, Sarah Sperry","doi":"10.1017/S0033291726105297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying how affect and daily behaviors influence each other is central to understanding mood disorder development. This study investigated how negative affect (NA), positive affect (PA), physical activity, and smartphone use influence one another in daily life, and whether familial risk or mood disorder history shapes these relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 14-day experience sampling protocol, we measured NA and PA five times a day along with passive sensing of step count and screen-on time. We examined the effect of familial high risk and history of mood disorders on within-person affect-behavior dynamics using Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (<i>n</i> = 82) and control participants (total <i>n</i> = 128, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 37.8, 57% female), of which 32 had a history of mood disorders (recurrent: <i>n</i> = 3, single: <i>n</i> = 29). Results showed a credible bidirectional relationship between step count and PA (step count → PA: <i>β</i> = 0.06; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.02-0.09; PA → step count: <i>β</i> = .07; 95% CrI, 0.03-0.11), while NA exhibited no credible associations. Higher PA predicted decreased screen-on time (<i>β</i> = -.05; 95% CrI, -0.08 to -0.02), while increased screen-on time was associated with subsequent elevated NA (<i>β</i> = .03; 95% CrI, 0.01-0.06). Familial risk status and recurrent mood disorders did not alter these bidirectional effects, but were associated with lower PA and higher NA on average (all <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight PA as a key driver in the interplay between behavior and affect. Supporting PA through increased activity may help improve daily emotional experiences, even in those with elevated mood disorder risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"56 ","pages":"e291"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291726105297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying how affect and daily behaviors influence each other is central to understanding mood disorder development. This study investigated how negative affect (NA), positive affect (PA), physical activity, and smartphone use influence one another in daily life, and whether familial risk or mood disorder history shapes these relationships.

Methods: In a 14-day experience sampling protocol, we measured NA and PA five times a day along with passive sensing of step count and screen-on time. We examined the effect of familial high risk and history of mood disorders on within-person affect-behavior dynamics using Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling.

Results: The sample included offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (n = 82) and control participants (total n = 128, Mage = 37.8, 57% female), of which 32 had a history of mood disorders (recurrent: n = 3, single: n = 29). Results showed a credible bidirectional relationship between step count and PA (step count → PA: β = 0.06; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.02-0.09; PA → step count: β = .07; 95% CrI, 0.03-0.11), while NA exhibited no credible associations. Higher PA predicted decreased screen-on time (β = -.05; 95% CrI, -0.08 to -0.02), while increased screen-on time was associated with subsequent elevated NA (β = .03; 95% CrI, 0.01-0.06). Familial risk status and recurrent mood disorders did not alter these bidirectional effects, but were associated with lower PA and higher NA on average (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Findings highlight PA as a key driver in the interplay between behavior and affect. Supporting PA through increased activity may help improve daily emotional experiences, even in those with elevated mood disorder risk.

情绪障碍风险个体的情感、屏幕时间和步数的时间动态。
背景:确定情绪和日常行为如何相互影响是理解情绪障碍发展的核心。这项研究调查了消极影响(NA)、积极影响(PA)、身体活动和智能手机使用在日常生活中如何相互影响,以及家族风险或情绪障碍史是否影响了这些关系。方法:在为期14天的经验采样方案中,我们每天测量5次NA和PA,同时被动感知步数和屏幕打开时间。我们使用动态结构方程模型研究了家族性高风险和情绪障碍史对个人情感-行为动力学的影响。结果:样本包括双相情感障碍父母的后代(n = 82)和对照组(总n = 128,男= 37.8,57%为女性),其中32例有情绪障碍病史(复发性:n = 3,单纯性:n = 29)。结果显示,步数与PA之间存在可信的双向关系(步数→PA: β = 0.06, 95%可信区间[CrI], 0.02 ~ 0.09; PA→步数:β = 0.07, 95%可信区间[CrI], 0.03 ~ 0.11),而NA无可信关联。较高的PA预测屏幕打开时间减少(β = - 0.05; 95% CrI, -0.08至-0.02),而屏幕打开时间增加与随后的NA升高相关(β = 0.03; 95% CrI, 0.01-0.06)。家族风险状况和复发性情绪障碍并没有改变这些双向效应,但与平均较低的PA和较高的NA相关(所有p)。结论:研究结果强调PA是行为和情绪之间相互作用的关键驱动因素。通过增加活动来支持PA可能有助于改善日常情绪体验,即使对那些情绪障碍风险较高的人也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书