[Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt].

Q2 Environmental Science
Jia-He Li, Wei-Yue Li, Yao-Hui Liu
{"title":"[Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt].","authors":"Jia-He Li, Wei-Yue Li, Yao-Hui Liu","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202504187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conducting landscape ecological risk assessment and exploring driving factors can provide scientific support for ecological protection and high-quality development. The Yangtze River Economic Belt was selected as the study area, and multi-temporal remote sensing land-use data from 2010, 2015, and 2020 was utilized to construct a landscape ecological risk assessment model employing landscape pattern indices. We conducted a land type distribution analysis to explore the temporal and spatial fluctuations in landscape ecological risks. The Moran index was utilized to examine the spatial correlation and clustering patterns of landscape ecological risks, while the optimal parameter Geodetector was applied to investigate the driving forces of impact factors. The results indicate:① Arable land, forests, and grasslands constituted the principal categories of land. Between 2010 and 2015, the region experiencing changes in land use constituted 0.77% of the whole research area; however, from 2015 to 2020, this region represented 29.80% of the total study area, signifying substantial variations in land use patterns. ② The principal levels of landscape ecological risk were low risk, lower risk, and medium risk. High-risk regions were predominantly located in the Yangtze River Delta, the Su-Wan Floodplain, the Jianghan Plain, the Dongting Lake Plain, the Poyang Lake Plain, and the foothills of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in northwestern Sichuan Province. The ecological hazards in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River exceeded those found in the upper reaches. ③ From 2010 to 2015, landscape ecological risk alterations were predominantly observed in lower-risk areas, which evolved into low ecological risk zones. The magnitude of these alterations was more pronounced in the higher reaches than in the middle and lower reaches. It was evident that between the years 2015 and 2020, the region exhibiting elevated risk levels surpassed that of reduced risks, and the magnitude of alterations in risk levels was more pronounced. The distribution of landscape ecological risk demonstrated a positive spatial association, characterized by a generally consistent spatial clustering pattern. Initially, high-high clustering rose before declining, whereas low-low clustering persisted in its decline. ④ The level of human disturbance, land use intensity, NDVI, and slope have been identified as significant determinants of landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The explanatory power of pairwise interactions between driving factors was enhanced. The results of the research are of significance for the optimization of ecological compensation and sustainable development planning in the study area.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"47 9","pages":"6317-6327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202504187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conducting landscape ecological risk assessment and exploring driving factors can provide scientific support for ecological protection and high-quality development. The Yangtze River Economic Belt was selected as the study area, and multi-temporal remote sensing land-use data from 2010, 2015, and 2020 was utilized to construct a landscape ecological risk assessment model employing landscape pattern indices. We conducted a land type distribution analysis to explore the temporal and spatial fluctuations in landscape ecological risks. The Moran index was utilized to examine the spatial correlation and clustering patterns of landscape ecological risks, while the optimal parameter Geodetector was applied to investigate the driving forces of impact factors. The results indicate:① Arable land, forests, and grasslands constituted the principal categories of land. Between 2010 and 2015, the region experiencing changes in land use constituted 0.77% of the whole research area; however, from 2015 to 2020, this region represented 29.80% of the total study area, signifying substantial variations in land use patterns. ② The principal levels of landscape ecological risk were low risk, lower risk, and medium risk. High-risk regions were predominantly located in the Yangtze River Delta, the Su-Wan Floodplain, the Jianghan Plain, the Dongting Lake Plain, the Poyang Lake Plain, and the foothills of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in northwestern Sichuan Province. The ecological hazards in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River exceeded those found in the upper reaches. ③ From 2010 to 2015, landscape ecological risk alterations were predominantly observed in lower-risk areas, which evolved into low ecological risk zones. The magnitude of these alterations was more pronounced in the higher reaches than in the middle and lower reaches. It was evident that between the years 2015 and 2020, the region exhibiting elevated risk levels surpassed that of reduced risks, and the magnitude of alterations in risk levels was more pronounced. The distribution of landscape ecological risk demonstrated a positive spatial association, characterized by a generally consistent spatial clustering pattern. Initially, high-high clustering rose before declining, whereas low-low clustering persisted in its decline. ④ The level of human disturbance, land use intensity, NDVI, and slope have been identified as significant determinants of landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The explanatory power of pairwise interactions between driving factors was enhanced. The results of the research are of significance for the optimization of ecological compensation and sustainable development planning in the study area.

长江经济带景观生态风险时空演变及驱动力分析
开展景观生态风险评价,探索驱动因素,为生态保护和高质量发展提供科学支撑。以长江经济带为研究区,利用2010年、2015年和2020年的多时相遥感土地利用数据,构建了基于景观格局指数的景观生态风险评价模型。通过土地类型分布分析,探讨景观生态风险的时空变化规律。利用Moran指数分析景观生态风险的空间相关性和聚类格局,利用最优参数Geodetector分析影响因子的驱动力。结果表明:①耕地、森林和草地是土地的主要类型。2010 - 2015年,土地利用变化的区域占整个研究区域的0.77%,而2015 - 2020年,该区域占整个研究区域的29.80%,表明土地利用格局发生了实质性变化。②景观生态风险的主要等级为低风险、低风险和中风险。高发区主要分布在长江三角洲、苏湾冲积平原、江汉平原、洞庭湖平原、鄱阳湖平原和川西北青藏高原丘陵地带。长江中下游地区的生态危害性大于上游地区。③2010 - 2015年景观生态风险变化以低风险区为主,逐渐向低风险区演变。这些变化的幅度在上游比中下游更为明显。从2015年到2020年,风险水平升高的区域明显超过了风险水平降低的区域,风险水平变化的幅度更加明显。景观生态风险的空间分布呈现正相关关系,空间聚类格局基本一致。高-高聚类先上升后下降,低-低聚类则持续下降。④人类干扰程度、土地利用强度、NDVI和坡度是长江经济带景观生态风险的重要决定因素。驱动因素间两两交互作用的解释力增强。研究结果对研究区生态补偿优化和可持续发展规划具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书