Alex Hung Kuo Chou, You-Sun Lee, Ahmed Shoaib, Nikhillesh Vaiid, Sheila So, Yoon-Ah Kook, Olivier Nicolay
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Molar Intrusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Force Loading.","authors":"Alex Hung Kuo Chou, You-Sun Lee, Ahmed Shoaib, Nikhillesh Vaiid, Sheila So, Yoon-Ah Kook, Olivier Nicolay","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of maxillary molar intrusion using the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) and conventional temporary anchorage devices (TADs) through finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional models of the maxilla were constructed from computed tomography images of a skull study model. FEA models were developed to simulate two different modalities. In the first modality (M1), the MCPP was evaluated by applying forces from three distinct hook locations: 3 mm coronal to the center of resistance of the first molar (M1-A), at the level of the center of resistance (M1-B), and 5 mm apical to the center of resistance (M1-C). In the second modality (M2), maxillary first molar intrusion was evaluated using TADs with an elastic band directed between buccal and palatal miniscrews contacting the tooth occlusal surface. Tooth displacement and stress distribution were analysed for both modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>M1-A, distalization of the tooth occurred, accompanied by extrusion. M1-B demonstrated distalization with negligible vertical changes, while M1-C resulted in the least distalization but with intrusion. Comparing M1-C with the TADs, M1-C showed similar intrusion as in M2 with the same magnitude of force but with less Von Mises stress at the root surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FEA revealed that the MCPP is a versatile appliance that allows tooth movement with selective control of extrusion or intrusion. The MCPP with indirect force loading can induce the same intrusive movement of the maxillary molar as TADs with less stress on the root surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of maxillary molar intrusion using the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) and conventional temporary anchorage devices (TADs) through finite element analysis (FEA).
Methods: Three-dimensional models of the maxilla were constructed from computed tomography images of a skull study model. FEA models were developed to simulate two different modalities. In the first modality (M1), the MCPP was evaluated by applying forces from three distinct hook locations: 3 mm coronal to the center of resistance of the first molar (M1-A), at the level of the center of resistance (M1-B), and 5 mm apical to the center of resistance (M1-C). In the second modality (M2), maxillary first molar intrusion was evaluated using TADs with an elastic band directed between buccal and palatal miniscrews contacting the tooth occlusal surface. Tooth displacement and stress distribution were analysed for both modalities.
Results: M1-A, distalization of the tooth occurred, accompanied by extrusion. M1-B demonstrated distalization with negligible vertical changes, while M1-C resulted in the least distalization but with intrusion. Comparing M1-C with the TADs, M1-C showed similar intrusion as in M2 with the same magnitude of force but with less Von Mises stress at the root surfaces.
Conclusion: FEA revealed that the MCPP is a versatile appliance that allows tooth movement with selective control of extrusion or intrusion. The MCPP with indirect force loading can induce the same intrusive movement of the maxillary molar as TADs with less stress on the root surface.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.