Family Impact of Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study Using FROM-16.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oral diseases Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1111/odi.70478
Mona Jullie Hajj, Nicholas Sotak, Alessandro Villa, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Lloyd Mancl, Thaís Cristina Esteves-Pereira, Milda Chmieliauskaite
{"title":"Family Impact of Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study Using FROM-16.","authors":"Mona Jullie Hajj, Nicholas Sotak, Alessandro Villa, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Lloyd Mancl, Thaís Cristina Esteves-Pereira, Milda Chmieliauskaite","doi":"10.1111/odi.70478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic oral pain condition associated with psychological distress and reduced quality of life. Although BMS' impact on patients is documented, family member impact remains poorly understood. This study evaluated family impact using Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16), explored family burden associations, assessed FROM-16 domains, and identified unmet support needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 26 patient-family member dyads from an oral medicine clinic. Family burden was assessed using FROM-16. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically to characterize family experiences and support needs. Associations between family burden and demographic/clinical variables were explored using nonparametric analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median total FROM-16 score was 5.5. Emotional burden exceeded personal/social burden, with worry, sadness, and frustration most common. Disruptions in family activities, eating habits, and family expenses were main social concerns. Lower household income was associated with higher burden scores. Qualitative findings confirmed emotional strain, altered social behaviors, and financial stress. Knowledgeable healthcare providers were the primary support source, although unmet healthcare, mental health, social, and treatment needs persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BMS affects families through emotional distress, disrupted eating habits, and social activities. These preliminary findings support evaluation of family-centered multidisciplinary approaches to improve support for patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.70478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic oral pain condition associated with psychological distress and reduced quality of life. Although BMS' impact on patients is documented, family member impact remains poorly understood. This study evaluated family impact using Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16), explored family burden associations, assessed FROM-16 domains, and identified unmet support needs.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 26 patient-family member dyads from an oral medicine clinic. Family burden was assessed using FROM-16. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically to characterize family experiences and support needs. Associations between family burden and demographic/clinical variables were explored using nonparametric analyses.

Results: Median total FROM-16 score was 5.5. Emotional burden exceeded personal/social burden, with worry, sadness, and frustration most common. Disruptions in family activities, eating habits, and family expenses were main social concerns. Lower household income was associated with higher burden scores. Qualitative findings confirmed emotional strain, altered social behaviors, and financial stress. Knowledgeable healthcare providers were the primary support source, although unmet healthcare, mental health, social, and treatment needs persisted.

Conclusions: BMS affects families through emotional distress, disrupted eating habits, and social activities. These preliminary findings support evaluation of family-centered multidisciplinary approaches to improve support for patients and families.

灼口综合征的家庭影响:使用FROM-16的横断面研究。
背景:灼口综合征(BMS)是一种与心理困扰和生活质量下降相关的慢性口腔疼痛状况。虽然BMS对患者的影响有文献记载,但家庭成员的影响仍然知之甚少。本研究使用家庭报告结果量表(FROM-16)评估家庭影响,探讨家庭负担关联,评估FROM-16领域,并确定未满足的支持需求。方法:本横断面研究纳入26例口腔医学门诊患者家属。采用form -16量表评估家庭负担。对开放式回答进行主题分析,以表征家庭经历和支持需求。使用非参数分析探讨家庭负担与人口统计学/临床变量之间的关系。结果:FROM-16总分中位数为5.5分。情感负担超过了个人/社会负担,担忧、悲伤和沮丧是最常见的。家庭活动、饮食习惯和家庭开支的中断是主要的社会问题。家庭收入越低,负担得分越高。定性研究结果证实了情绪紧张、社会行为改变和经济压力。知识渊博的医疗保健提供者是主要的支持来源,尽管未满足的医疗保健、心理健康、社会和治疗需求仍然存在。结论:BMS通过情绪困扰、饮食习惯紊乱和社会活动影响家庭。这些初步发现支持以家庭为中心的多学科方法的评估,以改善对患者和家庭的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral diseases
Oral diseases 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
325
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书