CUSA Aspirates in Brain Tumors: Integrating Findings from a Single-Center Cohort and a 49-Center National Survey to Reassess Clinical Utility.

IF 1.5 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Ayse Humeyra Dur-Karasayar, Sepehr Mahmoudi Azar, Ibrahim Kulac
{"title":"CUSA Aspirates in Brain Tumors: Integrating Findings from a Single-Center Cohort and a 49-Center National Survey to Reassess Clinical Utility.","authors":"Ayse Humeyra Dur-Karasayar, Sepehr Mahmoudi Azar, Ibrahim Kulac","doi":"10.5146/tjpath.2026.15438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>< strong > Objective: < /strong > Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA)&ndash;derived material is routinely generated during neurosurgical tumor resections but is often regarded as surgical waste. Although previous studies have demonstrated its potential for diagnostic and research applications, its real-world utilization and perceived value in routine neuropathology practice in T&uuml;rkiye remain unknown. < strong > Material and Methods: < /strong > We conducted a retrospective single-center study evaluating CUSA aspirates received between 2021 and 2026, focusing on diagnostic yield, histologic quality, and suitability for ancillary testing. In parallel, a nationwide cross-sectional survey was also performed to assess submission practices, processing methods, and perceptions regarding the diagnostic and research utility of CUSA-derived material. < strong > Results: < /strong > Among 10 brain tumor cases, diagnostic tumor tissue was identified in 9 CUSA aspirates (90%). All diagnostically positive samples yielded sufficient material for immunohistochemistry. In one high grade diffuse glioma case, the aspirated material alone contained all features required for diagnosis and grading. Non-neoplastic CNS parenchyma was also present in five cases. Survey results demonstrated that CUSA aspirates are not routinely submitted in most centers (63.3%), and when submitted the processing methods vary. Despite limitations, most respondents acknowledged at least partial diagnostic utility. Lack of standardized protocols and limited awareness were identified as the main barriers to broader utilization. < strong > Conclusion: < /strong > CUSA aspirates represent an underutilized resource with significant diagnostic and translational potential. While often overlooked in routine practice, these materials can provide sufficient tissue for histopathologic evaluation and ancillary testing. Bridging the gap between demonstrated utility and current practice will require improved awareness, interdisciplinary coordination, and standardized handling protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":45415,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2026.15438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

< strong > Objective: < /strong > Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA)–derived material is routinely generated during neurosurgical tumor resections but is often regarded as surgical waste. Although previous studies have demonstrated its potential for diagnostic and research applications, its real-world utilization and perceived value in routine neuropathology practice in Türkiye remain unknown. < strong > Material and Methods: < /strong > We conducted a retrospective single-center study evaluating CUSA aspirates received between 2021 and 2026, focusing on diagnostic yield, histologic quality, and suitability for ancillary testing. In parallel, a nationwide cross-sectional survey was also performed to assess submission practices, processing methods, and perceptions regarding the diagnostic and research utility of CUSA-derived material. < strong > Results: < /strong > Among 10 brain tumor cases, diagnostic tumor tissue was identified in 9 CUSA aspirates (90%). All diagnostically positive samples yielded sufficient material for immunohistochemistry. In one high grade diffuse glioma case, the aspirated material alone contained all features required for diagnosis and grading. Non-neoplastic CNS parenchyma was also present in five cases. Survey results demonstrated that CUSA aspirates are not routinely submitted in most centers (63.3%), and when submitted the processing methods vary. Despite limitations, most respondents acknowledged at least partial diagnostic utility. Lack of standardized protocols and limited awareness were identified as the main barriers to broader utilization. < strong > Conclusion: < /strong > CUSA aspirates represent an underutilized resource with significant diagnostic and translational potential. While often overlooked in routine practice, these materials can provide sufficient tissue for histopathologic evaluation and ancillary testing. Bridging the gap between demonstrated utility and current practice will require improved awareness, interdisciplinary coordination, and standardized handling protocols.

脑肿瘤CUSA抽吸器:整合来自单中心队列和49个中心国家调查的结果以重新评估临床效用。
目的:< /strong >空腔超声外科吸引器(CUSA)衍生材料是神经外科肿瘤切除术中常规产生的材料,但常被视为手术废物。虽然以前的研究已经证明了它在诊断和研究应用方面的潜力,但它在Tü;rkiye常规神经病理学实践中的实际应用和感知价值仍然未知。材料和方法:< /strong >我们进行了一项回顾性单中心研究,评估2021年至2026年间接受的CUSA吸液,重点关注诊断率、组织学质量和辅助检测的适用性。与此同时,还进行了一项全国性的横断面调查,以评估提交实践、处理方法以及对cusa衍生材料的诊断和研究效用的看法。结果:< /strong >在10例脑肿瘤病例中,9例(90%)CUSA抽吸物被诊断出肿瘤组织。所有诊断阳性的样本都有足够的免疫组织化学材料。在一例高级别弥漫性胶质瘤病例中,仅吸出的物质就包含了诊断和分级所需的所有特征。5例非肿瘤性中枢神经实质。调查结果显示,大多数中心(63.3%)没有常规提交CUSA抽吸器,提交时处理方法各不相同。尽管存在局限性,但大多数受访者至少承认部分诊断效用。缺乏标准化的协议和有限的认识被认为是广泛利用的主要障碍。结论:< /strong > CUSA抽吸器是一种未充分利用的资源,具有重要的诊断和转化潜力。虽然在常规实践中经常被忽视,但这些材料可以为组织病理学评估和辅助测试提供足够的组织。弥合演示效用和当前实践之间的差距需要提高认识、跨学科协调和标准化处理协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书