{"title":"Mediators and mechanisms of change in digital health interventions for physical activity behaviour: a systematic review.","authors":"Alfred S Y Lee, Haowei Zhang, Ryan E Rhodes","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2026.2735273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital health interventions are used to promote physical activity (PA), but the mechanisms through which they work remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised evidence on mediators and mechanisms of change in digital PA interventions for adults, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to organise mechanisms. Six databases were searched from inception to 5 March 2025 and updated on 25 February 2026. Eligible studies were experimental or quasi-experimental trials in adults that evaluated a digital intervention, included a PA outcome, and reported at least one mediation analysis for the intervention-mediator, mediator-PA, total intervention-PA, or indirect pathway. Twenty-four articles representing 23 trials met the inclusion criteria, and the updated search identified no new eligible studies. Sample sizes ranged from 51 to 1,166 (median = 242). Digital interventions produced a small total effect on omnibus PA (Path C: median r = .21, IQR = .19-.28). Across TDF domains, Path A effects were generally small to moderate, with behavioural regulation showing the clearest significance pattern. Path B associations were small and inconsistent, and Path AB indirect effects were uniformly small (median r ≈ .01-.06), with no TDF domain showing consistent mediation. Digital interventions may increase PA modestly, but stronger mediation research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2026.2735273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digital health interventions are used to promote physical activity (PA), but the mechanisms through which they work remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised evidence on mediators and mechanisms of change in digital PA interventions for adults, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to organise mechanisms. Six databases were searched from inception to 5 March 2025 and updated on 25 February 2026. Eligible studies were experimental or quasi-experimental trials in adults that evaluated a digital intervention, included a PA outcome, and reported at least one mediation analysis for the intervention-mediator, mediator-PA, total intervention-PA, or indirect pathway. Twenty-four articles representing 23 trials met the inclusion criteria, and the updated search identified no new eligible studies. Sample sizes ranged from 51 to 1,166 (median = 242). Digital interventions produced a small total effect on omnibus PA (Path C: median r = .21, IQR = .19-.28). Across TDF domains, Path A effects were generally small to moderate, with behavioural regulation showing the clearest significance pattern. Path B associations were small and inconsistent, and Path AB indirect effects were uniformly small (median r ≈ .01-.06), with no TDF domain showing consistent mediation. Digital interventions may increase PA modestly, but stronger mediation research is needed.
期刊介绍:
The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.