Mediators and mechanisms of change in digital health interventions for physical activity behaviour: a systematic review.

IF 9.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alfred S Y Lee, Haowei Zhang, Ryan E Rhodes
{"title":"Mediators and mechanisms of change in digital health interventions for physical activity behaviour: a systematic review.","authors":"Alfred S Y Lee, Haowei Zhang, Ryan E Rhodes","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2026.2735273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital health interventions are used to promote physical activity (PA), but the mechanisms through which they work remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised evidence on mediators and mechanisms of change in digital PA interventions for adults, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to organise mechanisms. Six databases were searched from inception to 5 March 2025 and updated on 25 February 2026. Eligible studies were experimental or quasi-experimental trials in adults that evaluated a digital intervention, included a PA outcome, and reported at least one mediation analysis for the intervention-mediator, mediator-PA, total intervention-PA, or indirect pathway. Twenty-four articles representing 23 trials met the inclusion criteria, and the updated search identified no new eligible studies. Sample sizes ranged from 51 to 1,166 (median = 242). Digital interventions produced a small total effect on omnibus PA (Path C: median r = .21, IQR = .19-.28). Across TDF domains, Path A effects were generally small to moderate, with behavioural regulation showing the clearest significance pattern. Path B associations were small and inconsistent, and Path AB indirect effects were uniformly small (median r ≈ .01-.06), with no TDF domain showing consistent mediation. Digital interventions may increase PA modestly, but stronger mediation research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2026.2735273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital health interventions are used to promote physical activity (PA), but the mechanisms through which they work remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised evidence on mediators and mechanisms of change in digital PA interventions for adults, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to organise mechanisms. Six databases were searched from inception to 5 March 2025 and updated on 25 February 2026. Eligible studies were experimental or quasi-experimental trials in adults that evaluated a digital intervention, included a PA outcome, and reported at least one mediation analysis for the intervention-mediator, mediator-PA, total intervention-PA, or indirect pathway. Twenty-four articles representing 23 trials met the inclusion criteria, and the updated search identified no new eligible studies. Sample sizes ranged from 51 to 1,166 (median = 242). Digital interventions produced a small total effect on omnibus PA (Path C: median r = .21, IQR = .19-.28). Across TDF domains, Path A effects were generally small to moderate, with behavioural regulation showing the clearest significance pattern. Path B associations were small and inconsistent, and Path AB indirect effects were uniformly small (median r ≈ .01-.06), with no TDF domain showing consistent mediation. Digital interventions may increase PA modestly, but stronger mediation research is needed.

身体活动行为的数字健康干预措施变化的中介和机制:系统综述。
数字健康干预措施用于促进身体活动(PA),但其工作机制尚不清楚。本系统综述综合了成人数字PA干预变化的中介和机制的证据,使用理论领域框架(TDF)来组织机制。从建立到2025年3月5日检索了六个数据库,并于2026年2月25日更新。符合条件的研究是在成人中进行的实验或准实验试验,这些试验评估了数字干预,包括PA结果,并报告了至少一项干预-中介、中介-PA、总干预-PA或间接途径的中介分析。24篇代表23项试验的文章符合纳入标准,更新后的检索未发现新的符合条件的研究。样本量从51到1166(中位数= 242)。数字干预对综合PA的总影响较小(路径C:中位数r =)。21, iqr = 0.19 - 0.28)。在整个TDF域,路径A效应通常是小到中等的,行为调节表现出最明显的显著模式。路径B的关联较小且不一致,路径AB的间接效应一致较小(中位数r≈0.01 - 0.06),没有TDF域显示一致的中介作用。数字干预可能会适度增加PA,但需要更强有力的中介研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书