[Spatial-temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in Karst and Non-karst Areas of Guangxi Based on Random Forest].

Q2 Environmental Science
Xiao-Yu Linghu, Xing-Ping Wei, Jun-Bing Pu, Fan Yan, Shi-Die Chen, Hui Li, Rou-Man Huang, Yun-Li Cai
{"title":"[Spatial-temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in Karst and Non-karst Areas of Guangxi Based on Random Forest].","authors":"Xiao-Yu Linghu, Xing-Ping Wei, Jun-Bing Pu, Fan Yan, Shi-Die Chen, Hui Li, Rou-Man Huang, Yun-Li Cai","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202507378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The difference in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) between karst and non-karst areas affects the accurate assessment of soil carbon sinks at the provincial scale, making it a hot and difficult topic in soil carbon pool research. Taking the karst and non-karst regions of Guangxi as an example, and based on soil profile and environmental variable data from 1980 and 2010, a random forest model was constructed to analyze the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of topsoil SOCD in karst and non-karst region. Furthermore, SHAP values and partial dependence plots were employed to reveal the response characteristics of different driving factors to topsoil SOCD in the two regions. The results show that: ① The mean SOCD in the karst region was higher than that in the non-karst region in both 1980 and 2010. The areas with a decrease in the annual mean change rate of SOCD in the karst region showed a high spatial consistency with the expansion areas of rocky desertification. ②Total nitrogen content and slope were both key driving factors affecting SOCD in the two regions. In addition, silt content, soil types, and normalized difference vegetation index significantly influenced SOCD in the karst region, while mean annual temperature, elevation, and total precipitation exerted important impacts on SOCD in the non-karst region. ③ The relationships between SOCD and the driving factors were characterized by diversity. SOCD showed a nonlinear positive correlation with total nitrogen content, silt content, normalized vegetation index, and elevation; a nonlinear negative correlation with mean annual temperature and total annual precipitation; and a nonlinear relationship with slope that was initially negative and then positive. Moreover, there were distinct thresholds in all these relationships. These research findings provide a scientific basis for systematically assessing the potential of soil carbon sinks, formulating measures for regulating soil carbon pools, and developing carbon management zoning strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"47 9","pages":"6223-6236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202507378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The difference in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) between karst and non-karst areas affects the accurate assessment of soil carbon sinks at the provincial scale, making it a hot and difficult topic in soil carbon pool research. Taking the karst and non-karst regions of Guangxi as an example, and based on soil profile and environmental variable data from 1980 and 2010, a random forest model was constructed to analyze the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of topsoil SOCD in karst and non-karst region. Furthermore, SHAP values and partial dependence plots were employed to reveal the response characteristics of different driving factors to topsoil SOCD in the two regions. The results show that: ① The mean SOCD in the karst region was higher than that in the non-karst region in both 1980 and 2010. The areas with a decrease in the annual mean change rate of SOCD in the karst region showed a high spatial consistency with the expansion areas of rocky desertification. ②Total nitrogen content and slope were both key driving factors affecting SOCD in the two regions. In addition, silt content, soil types, and normalized difference vegetation index significantly influenced SOCD in the karst region, while mean annual temperature, elevation, and total precipitation exerted important impacts on SOCD in the non-karst region. ③ The relationships between SOCD and the driving factors were characterized by diversity. SOCD showed a nonlinear positive correlation with total nitrogen content, silt content, normalized vegetation index, and elevation; a nonlinear negative correlation with mean annual temperature and total annual precipitation; and a nonlinear relationship with slope that was initially negative and then positive. Moreover, there were distinct thresholds in all these relationships. These research findings provide a scientific basis for systematically assessing the potential of soil carbon sinks, formulating measures for regulating soil carbon pools, and developing carbon management zoning strategies.

基于随机森林的广西喀斯特与非喀斯特地区土壤有机碳时空演变及驱动因素分析[j]。
喀斯特与非喀斯特地区土壤有机碳密度(SOCD)的差异影响着省级尺度土壤碳汇的准确评估,是土壤碳库研究的热点和难点之一。以广西喀斯特和非喀斯特地区为例,基于1980 ~ 2010年土壤剖面和环境变量数据,构建随机森林模型,分析了喀斯特和非喀斯特地区表土SOCD的时空分异特征。利用SHAP值和部分相关图揭示了不同驱动因素对两区表层土壤SOCD的响应特征。结果表明:①1980年和2010年喀斯特地区的平均SOCD均高于非喀斯特地区。喀斯特地区SOCD年平均变化率下降的区域与石漠化扩展区域具有较高的空间一致性。②全氮含量和坡度都是影响两区土壤有机碳含量的关键驱动因子。此外,粉砂含量、土壤类型和归一化植被指数对喀斯特地区SOCD有显著影响,而年平均气温、高程和总降水量对非喀斯特地区SOCD有重要影响。③SOCD与驱动因子的关系具有多样性。SOCD与全氮含量、粉砂含量、归一化植被指数、高程呈非线性正相关,与年平均气温、年总降水量呈非线性负相关,与坡度呈先负后正的非线性关系。此外,所有这些关系都有不同的阈值。研究结果为系统评价土壤碳汇潜力、制定土壤碳库调控措施、制定碳管理分区策略提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书