Baseline Superficial FAZ Disparity Is Associated With Recurrence in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion-related Macular Edema.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Taiichi Hikichi
{"title":"Baseline Superficial FAZ Disparity Is Associated With Recurrence in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion-related Macular Edema.","authors":"Taiichi Hikichi","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000005016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether recurrence burden in branch retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema (BRVOME) reflects longitudinal foveal avascular zone (FAZ) enlargement or baseline inter-eye superficial microvascular disparity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, paired-eye longitudinal study included consecutive treatment-naïve unilateral BRVOME eyes. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was performed at the first visit after complete resolution of ME following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy (baseline) and at 1 year. FAZ areas in superficial and deep capillary plexuses (SCP and DCP) were quantified in both BRVO and fellow eyes. Inter-eye FAZ disparity (ΔFAZ = BRVO - fellow) was calculated. Recurrence burden was defined as the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections during 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine eyes were analyzed. SCP and DCP FAZ areas were significantly larger in BRVO than in fellow eyes at baseline and remained larger at 1 year (both p < 0.001). Longitudinal FAZ enlargement was not associated with recurrence burden. Baseline ΔSCP was independently associated with higher recurrence burden. Each 0.1-mm2 increase in baseline ΔSCP was associated with an 8% increase in recurrence burden [incidence rate ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 - 1.16; p = 0.022]. Baseline ΔDCP was not associated with recurrence frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recurrence burden in BRVOME was associated with baseline superficial FAZ disparity rather than longitudinal FAZ progression. Baseline ΔSCP showed only modest discriminative ability and should be interpreted as one component of a broader microvascular risk profile rather than a standalone biomarker for recurrence prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000005016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether recurrence burden in branch retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema (BRVOME) reflects longitudinal foveal avascular zone (FAZ) enlargement or baseline inter-eye superficial microvascular disparity.

Methods: This retrospective, paired-eye longitudinal study included consecutive treatment-naïve unilateral BRVOME eyes. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was performed at the first visit after complete resolution of ME following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy (baseline) and at 1 year. FAZ areas in superficial and deep capillary plexuses (SCP and DCP) were quantified in both BRVO and fellow eyes. Inter-eye FAZ disparity (ΔFAZ = BRVO - fellow) was calculated. Recurrence burden was defined as the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections during 12 months.

Results: Sixty-nine eyes were analyzed. SCP and DCP FAZ areas were significantly larger in BRVO than in fellow eyes at baseline and remained larger at 1 year (both p < 0.001). Longitudinal FAZ enlargement was not associated with recurrence burden. Baseline ΔSCP was independently associated with higher recurrence burden. Each 0.1-mm2 increase in baseline ΔSCP was associated with an 8% increase in recurrence burden [incidence rate ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 - 1.16; p = 0.022]. Baseline ΔDCP was not associated with recurrence frequency.

Conclusion: Recurrence burden in BRVOME was associated with baseline superficial FAZ disparity rather than longitudinal FAZ progression. Baseline ΔSCP showed only modest discriminative ability and should be interpreted as one component of a broader microvascular risk profile rather than a standalone biomarker for recurrence prediction.

基线浅表FAZ差异与视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关性黄斑水肿复发相关。
目的:探讨视网膜分支静脉闭塞相关性黄斑水肿(BRVOME)的复发负担是否反映纵向中央凹无血管区(FAZ)扩大或基线眼间浅表微血管差。方法:这项回顾性、双眼纵向研究包括连续treatment-naïve单侧BRVOME眼。在抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗(基线)后ME完全消退后的第一次就诊和1年时进行光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)。在BRVO和同侧眼分别量化浅、深毛细血管丛FAZ面积(SCP和DCP)。计算眼间FAZ视差(ΔFAZ = BRVO - fellow)。复发负担定义为12个月内玻璃体内抗vegf注射次数。结果:69只眼被分析。BRVO的SCP和DCP FAZ区域在基线时明显大于其他眼睛,并且在1年后仍然较大(p < 0.001)。纵向FAZ增大与复发负担无关。基线ΔSCP与较高的复发负担独立相关。基线ΔSCP每增加0.1 mm2,复发负担增加8%[发病率比,1.08;95%置信区间为1.01 ~ 1.16;P = 0.022]。基线ΔDCP与复发频率无关。结论:BRVOME的复发负担与基线浅表FAZ差异有关,而与纵向FAZ进展无关。基线ΔSCP仅显示出适度的区分能力,应被解释为更广泛的微血管风险概况的一个组成部分,而不是用于复发预测的独立生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书