Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Significance of CLDN18 in Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: A Study of 13 Patients-A Single Institution Experience.
{"title":"Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Significance of CLDN18 in Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: A Study of 13 Patients-A Single Institution Experience.","authors":"Kaijian Zhang","doi":"10.1177/10668969261478610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveGastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is a rare, non-HPV-associated subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma with challenging diagnosis and poor prognosis. This study aims to characterize its clinicopathological features and evaluate the expression and prognostic significance of CLDN18.MethodsA total of 13 patients with pathologically confirmed G-EAC were collected.ResultsThe 13 patients, aged 39 to 64 years (mean 51.6 years), mostly sought medical attention due to abnormal findings on physical examination or specific symptoms, including abnormal vaginal discharge. Ten specimens were well-differentiated G-EAC, and 3 were moderately to poorly differentiated G-EAC. Atypical lobular endocervical gland hyperplasia (LEGH) was observed adjacent to G-EAC in 12 specimens. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage was stage I in 12 specimens and stage III in 1 specimen. The Ki-67 proliferation index ranged from <5% to 90%. Mutant-type immunostaining of p53 (overexpression or null pattern) was observed in 9 specimens; all 13 specimens were negative for estrogen receptor (ER), and 7 specimens showed positive CLDN18 expression. An exploratory survival analysis showed a trend toward shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with positive CLDN18 expression (<i>P</i> = .044), a finding limited by the small sample size. Thus, CLDN18 may serve as a highly specific diagnostic adjunct in a panel, and its potential prognostic significance warrants further investigation in larger cohorts.ConclusionG-EAC is rare, and its clinical diagnosis is challenging. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion, perform colposcopy with multi-site biopsy and endocervical curettage for suspicious specimens. Pathologists should integrate a panel of immunohistochemical markers with morphology to differentiate it from benign mimics. In addition, CLDN18 may not only serve as a diagnostic marker for G-EAC but may also be associated with patient prognosis, demonstrating its potential predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":14416,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"10668969261478610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969261478610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveGastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is a rare, non-HPV-associated subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma with challenging diagnosis and poor prognosis. This study aims to characterize its clinicopathological features and evaluate the expression and prognostic significance of CLDN18.MethodsA total of 13 patients with pathologically confirmed G-EAC were collected.ResultsThe 13 patients, aged 39 to 64 years (mean 51.6 years), mostly sought medical attention due to abnormal findings on physical examination or specific symptoms, including abnormal vaginal discharge. Ten specimens were well-differentiated G-EAC, and 3 were moderately to poorly differentiated G-EAC. Atypical lobular endocervical gland hyperplasia (LEGH) was observed adjacent to G-EAC in 12 specimens. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage was stage I in 12 specimens and stage III in 1 specimen. The Ki-67 proliferation index ranged from <5% to 90%. Mutant-type immunostaining of p53 (overexpression or null pattern) was observed in 9 specimens; all 13 specimens were negative for estrogen receptor (ER), and 7 specimens showed positive CLDN18 expression. An exploratory survival analysis showed a trend toward shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with positive CLDN18 expression (P = .044), a finding limited by the small sample size. Thus, CLDN18 may serve as a highly specific diagnostic adjunct in a panel, and its potential prognostic significance warrants further investigation in larger cohorts.ConclusionG-EAC is rare, and its clinical diagnosis is challenging. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion, perform colposcopy with multi-site biopsy and endocervical curettage for suspicious specimens. Pathologists should integrate a panel of immunohistochemical markers with morphology to differentiate it from benign mimics. In addition, CLDN18 may not only serve as a diagnostic marker for G-EAC but may also be associated with patient prognosis, demonstrating its potential predictive value.
目的胃型宫颈内膜腺癌(G-EAC)是一种罕见的、与hpv无关的宫颈内膜腺癌亚型,诊断困难,预后差。本研究旨在探讨其临床病理特征,评价CLDN18的表达及预后意义。方法收集经病理证实的G-EAC患者13例。结果13例患者年龄39 ~ 64岁(平均51.6岁),多因体检异常或阴道分泌物异常等特殊症状就诊。高分化G-EAC 10例,中分化至低分化G-EAC 3例。在12例G-EAC附近观察到不典型小叶颈内腺增生(LEGH)。FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) 12例标本为I期,1例为III期。Ki-67增殖指数从P =。044),这一发现受到样本量小的限制。因此,CLDN18可以作为一种高度特异性的诊断辅助手段,其潜在的预后意义值得在更大的队列中进一步研究。结论- eac罕见,临床诊断具有挑战性。临床医生应保持高度的怀疑指数,对可疑标本进行阴道镜多部位活检和宫颈内膜刮除。病理学家应结合一组免疫组织化学标记物与形态学来区分它与良性模拟。此外,CLDN18不仅可以作为G-EAC的诊断标志物,还可能与患者预后相关,显示其潜在的预测价值。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Surgical Pathology (IJSP) is a peer-reviewed journal published eight times a year, which offers original research and observations covering all major organ systems, timely reviews of new techniques and procedures, discussions of controversies in surgical pathology, case reports, and images in pathology. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).