Full-Body Versus Local Wipe Disinfection With Chlorhexidine Gluconate: No Difference in Surgical Site Infection After Acute Hip Fracture Surgery.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Eila M Sterner, Henrike Häbel, Gunnar V Edman, Wilhelmina Ekström
{"title":"Full-Body Versus Local Wipe Disinfection With Chlorhexidine Gluconate: No Difference in Surgical Site Infection After Acute Hip Fracture Surgery.","authors":"Eila M Sterner, Henrike Häbel, Gunnar V Edman, Wilhelmina Ekström","doi":"10.1111/iwj.71046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preoperative skin disinfection is essential to reduce surgical site infection. This study compared full body with local skin disinfection and examined additional patient related factors that could influence surgical site infection. This non-randomized intervention study, conducted over two consecutive periods, included patients with a hip fracture who received preoperative full-body disinfection with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate or local skin disinfection of the hip using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, with 90 days follow up. Postoperative dressing change was documented. 844 patients were included in the study; 556 (65.7%) patients were treated with full body disinfection and 288 patients (34.1%) with local wipes disinfection. Fourteen patients (1.7%) suffered from a surgical site infection, eleven patients in the full body disinfection group, and three patients with local wipes disinfection without any significant difference found between the groups. Seven (50%) patients with infection had the dressing changed < 48 h. Chronic kidney disease was significantly associated with local infection (p = 0.005). Local preoperative skin disinfection with a washcloth showed no increased risk of wound infection in patients with hip fracture compared to full body disinfection, indicating comparable effectiveness. Impaired kidney function may increase susceptibility. Documentation gaps highlight the need to evaluate adherence to dressing routines to strengthen postoperative wound care. Chlorhexidine gluconate, Full body skin disinfection, Hip fracture, Local wipes disinfection, Surgical site infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"23 9","pages":"e71046"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13590210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.71046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preoperative skin disinfection is essential to reduce surgical site infection. This study compared full body with local skin disinfection and examined additional patient related factors that could influence surgical site infection. This non-randomized intervention study, conducted over two consecutive periods, included patients with a hip fracture who received preoperative full-body disinfection with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate or local skin disinfection of the hip using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, with 90 days follow up. Postoperative dressing change was documented. 844 patients were included in the study; 556 (65.7%) patients were treated with full body disinfection and 288 patients (34.1%) with local wipes disinfection. Fourteen patients (1.7%) suffered from a surgical site infection, eleven patients in the full body disinfection group, and three patients with local wipes disinfection without any significant difference found between the groups. Seven (50%) patients with infection had the dressing changed < 48 h. Chronic kidney disease was significantly associated with local infection (p = 0.005). Local preoperative skin disinfection with a washcloth showed no increased risk of wound infection in patients with hip fracture compared to full body disinfection, indicating comparable effectiveness. Impaired kidney function may increase susceptibility. Documentation gaps highlight the need to evaluate adherence to dressing routines to strengthen postoperative wound care. Chlorhexidine gluconate, Full body skin disinfection, Hip fracture, Local wipes disinfection, Surgical site infection.

全身消毒与葡萄糖酸氯己定局部擦拭消毒:急性髋部骨折术后手术部位感染无差异。
术前皮肤消毒是减少手术部位感染的必要条件。本研究比较了全身消毒和局部皮肤消毒,并检查了可能影响手术部位感染的其他患者相关因素。这项非随机干预研究连续两期进行,纳入髋部骨折患者,术前接受4%葡萄糖酸氯己定全身消毒或2%葡萄糖酸氯己定局部皮肤消毒,随访90天。术后换药记录在案。844例患者纳入研究;全身消毒556例(65.7%),局部湿巾消毒288例(34.1%)。手术部位感染14例(1.7%),全身消毒组11例,局部湿巾消毒组3例,两组间差异无统计学意义。7例(50%)感染患者更换了敷料
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书