Clinical Utility of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Risk Stratifying Adnexal Masses: An Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy and Interrater Reliability.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zeynep Dönmez, Ahmet Akçay, Ümmühan Ebru Karabulut, Bahar Atasoy, Abdusselim Adil Peker, Hüseyin Toprak, Mehmet Ali Gültekin
{"title":"Clinical Utility of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Risk Stratifying Adnexal Masses: An Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy and Interrater Reliability.","authors":"Zeynep Dönmez, Ahmet Akçay, Ümmühan Ebru Karabulut, Bahar Atasoy, Abdusselim Adil Peker, Hüseyin Toprak, Mehmet Ali Gültekin","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate characterization of adnexal masses is essential for determining malignancy risk and guiding clinical management. While the O-RADS MRI system provides standardized risk stratification, the impact of MRI acquisition protocols on diagnostic performance and interrater reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI, assess interrater reliability between readers with different experience levels, and investigate the contribution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to reader concordance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 387 patients with 496 adnexal masses were retrospectively analyzed. Histopathologic diagnosis was obtained through surgery or biopsy, while lesions without histopathology were considered benign if they remained stable or regressed during at least 9 months of imaging follow-up. Two radiologists with different levels of experience independently evaluated all MRI examinations using the O-RADS MRI lexicon. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with area under the curve (AUC). Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the Cohen κ statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both readers demonstrated high diagnostic performance. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.8%, 94.1%, and 95.2% for reader 1, and 96.8%, 92.9%, and 94.4% for reader 2. AUC values were 0.976 (95% CI: 0.940-0.992) and 0.970 (95% CI: 0.933-0.989), respectively. Interobserver agreement was substantial for benign-malignant classification (κ = 0.757; 95% CI: 0.624-0.889) and excellent for O-RADS category assignment (κ = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.919-0.962). Diagnostic performance was comparable between dynamic and nondynamic protocols; however, dynamic MRI demonstrated higher interobserver agreement, particularly for lesion classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>O-RADS MRI provides high diagnostic performance and strong interobserver agreement in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Although dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI does not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy, it may enhance reader concordance, particularly in lesions with equivocal imaging features.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accurate characterization of adnexal masses is essential for determining malignancy risk and guiding clinical management. While the O-RADS MRI system provides standardized risk stratification, the impact of MRI acquisition protocols on diagnostic performance and interrater reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI, assess interrater reliability between readers with different experience levels, and investigate the contribution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to reader concordance.

Materials and methods: A total of 387 patients with 496 adnexal masses were retrospectively analyzed. Histopathologic diagnosis was obtained through surgery or biopsy, while lesions without histopathology were considered benign if they remained stable or regressed during at least 9 months of imaging follow-up. Two radiologists with different levels of experience independently evaluated all MRI examinations using the O-RADS MRI lexicon. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with area under the curve (AUC). Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the Cohen κ statistic.

Results: Both readers demonstrated high diagnostic performance. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.8%, 94.1%, and 95.2% for reader 1, and 96.8%, 92.9%, and 94.4% for reader 2. AUC values were 0.976 (95% CI: 0.940-0.992) and 0.970 (95% CI: 0.933-0.989), respectively. Interobserver agreement was substantial for benign-malignant classification (κ = 0.757; 95% CI: 0.624-0.889) and excellent for O-RADS category assignment (κ = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.919-0.962). Diagnostic performance was comparable between dynamic and nondynamic protocols; however, dynamic MRI demonstrated higher interobserver agreement, particularly for lesion classification.

Conclusion: O-RADS MRI provides high diagnostic performance and strong interobserver agreement in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Although dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI does not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy, it may enhance reader concordance, particularly in lesions with equivocal imaging features.

卵巢-附件报告和数据系统磁共振成像对危险分层附件肿块的临床应用:诊断效果和可靠性评估。
目的:准确的附件肿块特征对判断其恶性风险和指导临床治疗至关重要。虽然O-RADS MRI系统提供了标准化的风险分层,但MRI采集方案对诊断性能和互连器可靠性的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估O-RADS MRI的诊断性能,评估不同经验水平读者之间的互读可靠性,并探讨动态对比增强MRI对读者一致性的贡献。材料与方法:回顾性分析387例496例附件肿块。通过手术或活检获得组织病理学诊断,如果没有组织病理学的病变在至少9个月的影像学随访中保持稳定或消退,则认为是良性的。两位具有不同经验水平的放射科医生使用O-RADS MRI词典独立评估所有MRI检查。采用敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)的受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估诊断效果。使用Cohen κ统计量评估观察者间一致性。结果:两种读卡器均表现出较高的诊断效能。阅读器1的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.8%、94.1%和95.2%,阅读器2的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.8%、92.9%和94.4%。AUC值分别为0.976 (95% CI: 0.940-0.992)和0.970 (95% CI: 0.933-0.989)。在良恶性分类方面,观察者间的一致性非常好(κ = 0.757; 95% CI: 0.624-0.889),在O-RADS分类分配方面,观察者间的一致性非常好(κ = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.919-0.962)。动态和非动态协议的诊断性能相当;然而,动态MRI显示观察者之间的一致性更高,特别是在病变分类方面。结论:O-RADS MRI对附件肿块具有较高的诊断效能和较强的观察者间一致性。虽然动态对比增强MRI并不能显著提高诊断准确性,但它可以增强读者的一致性,特别是在具有模糊成像特征的病变中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书