A meta-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with or without embolization for esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding in decompensated liver cirrhosis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xiongtao Ma, Xinyan Yu, Qingping Wu, Yu Chen, Ting Jiang, Lei Wang, Qinghua Tao
{"title":"A meta-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with or without embolization for esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding in decompensated liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Xiongtao Ma, Xinyan Yu, Qingping Wu, Yu Chen, Ting Jiang, Lei Wang, Qinghua Tao","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with embolization could further improve efficacy for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for all relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies up to March 2025. Statistical results were evaluated using risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies involving 3079 patients were included. The statistical results showed that the rebleeding rate in the TIPS combined with embolization group was lower than that in the TIPS alone group (risk ratios = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.57-0.79; P  < 0.001), and the same result was observed only in the subgroup of patients with gastric variceal bleeding (risk ratios = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.34-0.74; P  < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in patients with isolated esophageal variceal bleeding (risk ratios = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.51-1.35; P  = 0.46). In addition, the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy in the TIPS combined with embolization group was also lower than that in the TIPS alone group (risk ratios = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.73-0.91; P  < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in survival rate (risk ratios = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.97-1.03; P  = 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with TIPS alone, the combined treatment showed a trend toward lower rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy, yet survival appeared similar between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1350-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with embolization could further improve efficacy for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for all relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies up to March 2025. Statistical results were evaluated using risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of 14 studies involving 3079 patients were included. The statistical results showed that the rebleeding rate in the TIPS combined with embolization group was lower than that in the TIPS alone group (risk ratios = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.57-0.79; P  < 0.001), and the same result was observed only in the subgroup of patients with gastric variceal bleeding (risk ratios = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.34-0.74; P  < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in patients with isolated esophageal variceal bleeding (risk ratios = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.51-1.35; P  = 0.46). In addition, the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy in the TIPS combined with embolization group was also lower than that in the TIPS alone group (risk ratios = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.73-0.91; P  < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in survival rate (risk ratios = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.97-1.03; P  = 0.94).

Conclusion: Compared with TIPS alone, the combined treatment showed a trend toward lower rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy, yet survival appeared similar between the two groups.

经颈静脉肝内门静脉分流术伴或不伴栓塞治疗失代偿期肝硬化患者食管和胃静脉曲张出血的meta分析。
背景:本研究旨在评价经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)联合栓塞术是否能进一步提高失代偿期肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张出血患者的疗效。方法:我们检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane Library,检索截至2025年3月的所有相关随机对照试验和队列研究。采用风险比和95%置信区间(ci)对统计结果进行评价。结果:共纳入14项研究,涉及3079例患者。统计学结果显示,TIPS联合栓塞组再出血率低于单独使用TIPS组(风险比= 0.67;95% CI = 0.57-0.79; P)。结论:与单独使用TIPS相比,TIPS联合治疗有再出血和肝性脑病发生率较低的趋势,但两组患者的生存率相近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书