Kendall G Kanakanui, Fransky Hantelys, Hannah R Hrncir, Sergei Bombin, Adam D Gracz
{"title":"Multi-gene biomarkers reveal spatial organization and subpopulation-specific damage response in biliary epithelial cells.","authors":"Kendall G Kanakanui, Fransky Hantelys, Hannah R Hrncir, Sergei Bombin, Adam D Gracz","doi":"10.1242/dev.205690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biliary epithelial cell (BEC) heterogeneity remains challenging to define. Here, we performed scRNA-seq on Sox9EGFP+ liver epithelium from mice subjected to bile duct ligation (BDL) and sham controls. We identified 4 BEC subpopulations in sham controls, each associated with specific enrichment of a minimal one or two gene biomarker ('metagene'). Metagenes were validated by hybridization chain reaction fluorescence in situ hybridization, which also facilitated spatial analysis of intrahepatic bile ducts. BECs belonging to a given subpopulation were most likely to have neighbors of the same identity, forming homogenous cellular compartments within otherwise heterogeneous ducts. Subpopulation specific differential gene expression (DGE) analysis revealed that BDL decreases transcriptomic heterogeneity among BECs by suppressing subpopulation specific genes. BDL samples also included a proliferative subpopulation not found in controls, which contained populations enriched for three of the four metagenes. All BEC subpopulations were observed in vitro in monolayer cultures, where they clustered spatially with BECs of the same subtype. Together, our data demonstrate that metagene biomarkers facilitate spatial localization of BEC subpopulations in situ, identify subpopulation-specific injury responses and confirm that BEC heterogeneity is preserved in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":11375,"journal":{"name":"Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.205690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biliary epithelial cell (BEC) heterogeneity remains challenging to define. Here, we performed scRNA-seq on Sox9EGFP+ liver epithelium from mice subjected to bile duct ligation (BDL) and sham controls. We identified 4 BEC subpopulations in sham controls, each associated with specific enrichment of a minimal one or two gene biomarker ('metagene'). Metagenes were validated by hybridization chain reaction fluorescence in situ hybridization, which also facilitated spatial analysis of intrahepatic bile ducts. BECs belonging to a given subpopulation were most likely to have neighbors of the same identity, forming homogenous cellular compartments within otherwise heterogeneous ducts. Subpopulation specific differential gene expression (DGE) analysis revealed that BDL decreases transcriptomic heterogeneity among BECs by suppressing subpopulation specific genes. BDL samples also included a proliferative subpopulation not found in controls, which contained populations enriched for three of the four metagenes. All BEC subpopulations were observed in vitro in monolayer cultures, where they clustered spatially with BECs of the same subtype. Together, our data demonstrate that metagene biomarkers facilitate spatial localization of BEC subpopulations in situ, identify subpopulation-specific injury responses and confirm that BEC heterogeneity is preserved in vitro.
期刊介绍:
Development’s scope covers all aspects of plant and animal development, including stem cell biology and regeneration. The single most important criterion for acceptance in Development is scientific excellence. Research papers (articles and reports) should therefore pose and test a significant hypothesis or address a significant question, and should provide novel perspectives that advance our understanding of development. We also encourage submission of papers that use computational methods or mathematical models to obtain significant new insights into developmental biology topics. Manuscripts that are descriptive in nature will be considered only when they lay important groundwork for a field and/or provide novel resources for understanding developmental processes of broad interest to the community.
Development includes a Techniques and Resources section for the publication of new methods, datasets, and other types of resources. Papers describing new techniques should include a proof-of-principle demonstration that the technique is valuable to the developmental biology community; they need not include in-depth follow-up analysis. The technique must be described in sufficient detail to be easily replicated by other investigators. Development will also consider protocol-type papers of exceptional interest to the community. We welcome submission of Resource papers, for example those reporting new databases, systems-level datasets, or genetic resources of major value to the developmental biology community. For all papers, the data or resource described must be made available to the community with minimal restrictions upon publication.
To aid navigability, Development has dedicated sections of the journal to stem cells & regeneration and to human development. The criteria for acceptance into these sections is identical to those outlined above. Authors and editors are encouraged to nominate appropriate manuscripts for inclusion in one of these sections.