{"title":"An Exploratory One Health Investigation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex at the Camel–Human Interface in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates","authors":"Gobena Ameni, Aboma Zewude, Asha Antony, Tsegaye Shamebo, Temesgen Mohammed, Nabeeha Hassan Abdelgaleel, Mohamud Sheek-Hussein, Balázs Ádám, Robert Barigye, Markos Tibbo","doi":"10.1155/tbed/7098203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This exploratory cross-sectional One Health study characterized LIODetect TB-ST antibody reactivity in dromedary camels and abattoir workers in Abu Dhabi Emirate and investigated tuberculosis-compatible lesions in slaughtered camels. Sera from 356 camels sampled from farms and livestock holdings (izbas), 393 camels presented for slaughter at Al Bawadi Abattoir, and 86 abattoir workers were screened with LIODetect TB-ST. All 25 LIODetect-reactive slaughtered camels underwent detailed postmortem examination; nonreactive slaughtered camels were not examined postmortem. Lesions identified in two reactive camels were evaluated by histopathology, Ziehl–Neelsen staining, and IS6110 polymerase chain reaction (PCR). LIODetect reactivity was detected in 33/356 field camels (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.5%–12.8%), 25/393 slaughtered camels (6.4%, 95% CI: 4.2%–9.2%), and 3/86 workers (3.5%, 95% CI: 0.7%–9.9%). No recorded characteristic was associated with reactivity among field camels. Among slaughtered camels, age group and body condition showed exploratory statistical associations with reactivity, but category-specific estimates were imprecise. Two of the 25 reactive slaughtered camels (8.0%) had granulomatous lymphadenitis with acid-fast bacilli, and lesion tissue from both animals contained IS6110-detectable <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex (MTBC) DNA. LIODetect TB-ST has not been validated for prevalence estimation in dromedaries; therefore, these proportions describe assay reactivity rather than true infection prevalence. Because postmortem examination was restricted to reactive animals, the 2/25 finding cannot estimate lesion prevalence, false-negative frequency, or positive predictive value. The three reactive workers represent an occupational-health surveillance signal, not evidence of active tuberculosis or camel-to-human transmission. Systematic meat inspection, validated camel diagnostics, culture and species-level molecular characterization, traceable animal movements, and linked veterinary and occupational-health surveillance are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/7098203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This exploratory cross-sectional One Health study characterized LIODetect TB-ST antibody reactivity in dromedary camels and abattoir workers in Abu Dhabi Emirate and investigated tuberculosis-compatible lesions in slaughtered camels. Sera from 356 camels sampled from farms and livestock holdings (izbas), 393 camels presented for slaughter at Al Bawadi Abattoir, and 86 abattoir workers were screened with LIODetect TB-ST. All 25 LIODetect-reactive slaughtered camels underwent detailed postmortem examination; nonreactive slaughtered camels were not examined postmortem. Lesions identified in two reactive camels were evaluated by histopathology, Ziehl–Neelsen staining, and IS6110 polymerase chain reaction (PCR). LIODetect reactivity was detected in 33/356 field camels (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.5%–12.8%), 25/393 slaughtered camels (6.4%, 95% CI: 4.2%–9.2%), and 3/86 workers (3.5%, 95% CI: 0.7%–9.9%). No recorded characteristic was associated with reactivity among field camels. Among slaughtered camels, age group and body condition showed exploratory statistical associations with reactivity, but category-specific estimates were imprecise. Two of the 25 reactive slaughtered camels (8.0%) had granulomatous lymphadenitis with acid-fast bacilli, and lesion tissue from both animals contained IS6110-detectable Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA. LIODetect TB-ST has not been validated for prevalence estimation in dromedaries; therefore, these proportions describe assay reactivity rather than true infection prevalence. Because postmortem examination was restricted to reactive animals, the 2/25 finding cannot estimate lesion prevalence, false-negative frequency, or positive predictive value. The three reactive workers represent an occupational-health surveillance signal, not evidence of active tuberculosis or camel-to-human transmission. Systematic meat inspection, validated camel diagnostics, culture and species-level molecular characterization, traceable animal movements, and linked veterinary and occupational-health surveillance are needed.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.