Jessie A Pelosi, Agustina Yañez, Leah N Veldhuisen, Anthony J Dant, Poppy C Northing, Rebecca G W Bland, Weston L Testo, Katrina M Dlugosch
{"title":"Testing fundamental hypotheses of colonization success in the ferns.","authors":"Jessie A Pelosi, Agustina Yañez, Leah N Veldhuisen, Anthony J Dant, Poppy C Northing, Rebecca G W Bland, Weston L Testo, Katrina M Dlugosch","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcag299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Non-native species are now ubiquitous members of regional floras. The factors that lead to establishment and dominance of non-native species are continuously debated. Fundamental hypotheses about drivers of invasion success include the role of phylogeny, polyploidy, genome size, and rapid niche evolution. These hypotheses have been tested in the seed plants, but ferns, the second largest group of vascular plants, have rarely been considered in these analyses, despite making up a non-trivial portion of non-native floras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled a dataset of global non-native ferns and categorized them along the invasion spectrum using descriptions from the literature and natural history collections. Using this dataset, we assessed I) the taxonomic diversity and phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) the geographic distribution of fern introductions, testing for shifts in climatic niches, and III) test for the association of 'invader' traits across the invasion continuum, including smaller genome sizes and higher ploidal levels.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We generated a dataset that includes 93 taxa; of these, we classified 19 as casual, 43 as naturalized (but not invasive), and 31 as invasive. Using this dataset, we found I) weak or no phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) some regions are overrepresented as sources and recipients of documented introductions, III) in a set of well-documented invasive taxa, climatic niches are often conserved between native and introduced ranges, but can differ between introductions, IV) naturalized ferns may have smaller genomes, and V) invaders may have higher ploidal levels, though the analyses in IV and V are sensitive to cytotype treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We integrated regional floras, occurrence and climate data, phylogeny, and cytology to test fundamental hypotheses regarding the colonization success of ferns. This study provides insights into the ecological, genomic, and phylogenetic features associated with the colonization of new habitats by non-native ferns, a largely overlooked portion of non-native plant taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Non-native species are now ubiquitous members of regional floras. The factors that lead to establishment and dominance of non-native species are continuously debated. Fundamental hypotheses about drivers of invasion success include the role of phylogeny, polyploidy, genome size, and rapid niche evolution. These hypotheses have been tested in the seed plants, but ferns, the second largest group of vascular plants, have rarely been considered in these analyses, despite making up a non-trivial portion of non-native floras.
Methods: We compiled a dataset of global non-native ferns and categorized them along the invasion spectrum using descriptions from the literature and natural history collections. Using this dataset, we assessed I) the taxonomic diversity and phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) the geographic distribution of fern introductions, testing for shifts in climatic niches, and III) test for the association of 'invader' traits across the invasion continuum, including smaller genome sizes and higher ploidal levels.
Key results: We generated a dataset that includes 93 taxa; of these, we classified 19 as casual, 43 as naturalized (but not invasive), and 31 as invasive. Using this dataset, we found I) weak or no phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) some regions are overrepresented as sources and recipients of documented introductions, III) in a set of well-documented invasive taxa, climatic niches are often conserved between native and introduced ranges, but can differ between introductions, IV) naturalized ferns may have smaller genomes, and V) invaders may have higher ploidal levels, though the analyses in IV and V are sensitive to cytotype treatment.
Conclusions: We integrated regional floras, occurrence and climate data, phylogeny, and cytology to test fundamental hypotheses regarding the colonization success of ferns. This study provides insights into the ecological, genomic, and phylogenetic features associated with the colonization of new habitats by non-native ferns, a largely overlooked portion of non-native plant taxa.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide.
The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.