Testing fundamental hypotheses of colonization success in the ferns.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Jessie A Pelosi, Agustina Yañez, Leah N Veldhuisen, Anthony J Dant, Poppy C Northing, Rebecca G W Bland, Weston L Testo, Katrina M Dlugosch
{"title":"Testing fundamental hypotheses of colonization success in the ferns.","authors":"Jessie A Pelosi, Agustina Yañez, Leah N Veldhuisen, Anthony J Dant, Poppy C Northing, Rebecca G W Bland, Weston L Testo, Katrina M Dlugosch","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcag299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Non-native species are now ubiquitous members of regional floras. The factors that lead to establishment and dominance of non-native species are continuously debated. Fundamental hypotheses about drivers of invasion success include the role of phylogeny, polyploidy, genome size, and rapid niche evolution. These hypotheses have been tested in the seed plants, but ferns, the second largest group of vascular plants, have rarely been considered in these analyses, despite making up a non-trivial portion of non-native floras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled a dataset of global non-native ferns and categorized them along the invasion spectrum using descriptions from the literature and natural history collections. Using this dataset, we assessed I) the taxonomic diversity and phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) the geographic distribution of fern introductions, testing for shifts in climatic niches, and III) test for the association of 'invader' traits across the invasion continuum, including smaller genome sizes and higher ploidal levels.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We generated a dataset that includes 93 taxa; of these, we classified 19 as casual, 43 as naturalized (but not invasive), and 31 as invasive. Using this dataset, we found I) weak or no phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) some regions are overrepresented as sources and recipients of documented introductions, III) in a set of well-documented invasive taxa, climatic niches are often conserved between native and introduced ranges, but can differ between introductions, IV) naturalized ferns may have smaller genomes, and V) invaders may have higher ploidal levels, though the analyses in IV and V are sensitive to cytotype treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We integrated regional floras, occurrence and climate data, phylogeny, and cytology to test fundamental hypotheses regarding the colonization success of ferns. This study provides insights into the ecological, genomic, and phylogenetic features associated with the colonization of new habitats by non-native ferns, a largely overlooked portion of non-native plant taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Non-native species are now ubiquitous members of regional floras. The factors that lead to establishment and dominance of non-native species are continuously debated. Fundamental hypotheses about drivers of invasion success include the role of phylogeny, polyploidy, genome size, and rapid niche evolution. These hypotheses have been tested in the seed plants, but ferns, the second largest group of vascular plants, have rarely been considered in these analyses, despite making up a non-trivial portion of non-native floras.

Methods: We compiled a dataset of global non-native ferns and categorized them along the invasion spectrum using descriptions from the literature and natural history collections. Using this dataset, we assessed I) the taxonomic diversity and phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) the geographic distribution of fern introductions, testing for shifts in climatic niches, and III) test for the association of 'invader' traits across the invasion continuum, including smaller genome sizes and higher ploidal levels.

Key results: We generated a dataset that includes 93 taxa; of these, we classified 19 as casual, 43 as naturalized (but not invasive), and 31 as invasive. Using this dataset, we found I) weak or no phylogenetic clustering of non-native ferns, II) some regions are overrepresented as sources and recipients of documented introductions, III) in a set of well-documented invasive taxa, climatic niches are often conserved between native and introduced ranges, but can differ between introductions, IV) naturalized ferns may have smaller genomes, and V) invaders may have higher ploidal levels, though the analyses in IV and V are sensitive to cytotype treatment.

Conclusions: We integrated regional floras, occurrence and climate data, phylogeny, and cytology to test fundamental hypotheses regarding the colonization success of ferns. This study provides insights into the ecological, genomic, and phylogenetic features associated with the colonization of new habitats by non-native ferns, a largely overlooked portion of non-native plant taxa.

检验蕨类植物成功定植的基本假设。
背景与目的:非本地物种现在是区域植物区系中普遍存在的成员。导致非本地物种建立和优势的因素一直存在争议。关于入侵成功的基本假设包括系统发育、多倍体、基因组大小和快速生态位进化的作用。这些假设已经在种子植物中得到了验证,但是蕨类植物,第二大维管植物群,在这些分析中很少被考虑,尽管在非本地植物区系中占了很大的一部分。方法:利用文献资料和自然文献资料对全球外来蕨类植物的入侵谱进行分类。利用该数据集,我们评估了I)非本地蕨类植物的分类多样性和系统发育聚类,II)蕨类植物引种的地理分布,气候生态位的变化测试,以及III)入侵连续体中“入侵者”特征的关联测试,包括较小的基因组大小和较高的倍体水平。关键结果:我们生成了一个包含93个分类群的数据集;其中,我们将19个归为“随意”,43个归为“归化”(但不是“入侵”),31个归为“入侵”。利用该数据,我们发现I)非本地蕨类植物的系统发育聚类较弱或没有聚类;II)一些地区作为文献引种的来源和接收地的代表性过高;III)在一组文献完备的入侵分类群中,气候生态位在本地和引种范围之间通常是保守的,但在引种范围之间可能存在差异;IV)归化蕨类植物可能具有较小的基因组,V)入侵者可能具有较高的倍体水平。虽然IV和V的分析对细胞型处理敏感。结论:我们综合了区域植物区系、发生和气候数据、系统发育和细胞学来验证有关蕨类植物定植成功的基本假设。本研究提供了与非本地蕨类植物在新栖息地定居相关的生态学、基因组学和系统发育特征的见解,这是非本地植物类群中一个很大程度上被忽视的部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书