Predictors of worsening food security among women living with and without HIV and seronegative women during COVID-19: a mixed methods study

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jenni M. Wise, Hilary Bethancourt, Torsten B. Neilands, Anna Leddy, Gypsyamber D’Souza, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Janet M. Turan, Gina Wingood, M. Reuel Friedman, Jennafer Kwait, Lakshmi Goparaju, Mardge Cohen, Tracey Wilson, Adebola Adedimeji, Catalina Ramirez, Deborah Jones, Margaret A. Fischl, Igho Ofotokun, Daniel Merenstein, Lisa R. Metsch, Valentina Stosor, Sarah Krier, Daniel Jacobson, Tonya Taylor, Corilyn Ott, Phyllis C. Tien, Sheri D. Weiser
{"title":"Predictors of worsening food security among women living with and without HIV and seronegative women during COVID-19: a mixed methods study","authors":"Jenni M. Wise,&nbsp;Hilary Bethancourt,&nbsp;Torsten B. Neilands,&nbsp;Anna Leddy,&nbsp;Gypsyamber D’Souza,&nbsp;Mirjam-Colette Kempf,&nbsp;Janet M. Turan,&nbsp;Gina Wingood,&nbsp;M. Reuel Friedman,&nbsp;Jennafer Kwait,&nbsp;Lakshmi Goparaju,&nbsp;Mardge Cohen,&nbsp;Tracey Wilson,&nbsp;Adebola Adedimeji,&nbsp;Catalina Ramirez,&nbsp;Deborah Jones,&nbsp;Margaret A. Fischl,&nbsp;Igho Ofotokun,&nbsp;Daniel Merenstein,&nbsp;Lisa R. Metsch,&nbsp;Valentina Stosor,&nbsp;Sarah Krier,&nbsp;Daniel Jacobson,&nbsp;Tonya Taylor,&nbsp;Corilyn Ott,&nbsp;Phyllis C. Tien,&nbsp;Sheri D. Weiser","doi":"10.1007/s12571-026-01693-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence, severity, predictors, and lived experiences of food insecurity among women enrolled in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study in the USA in 2020, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that pre-existing socioeconomic and health-related disparities would heighten the risk of worsening food insecurity during the pandemic. The 10-item US Household Food Security Survey was administered to participants three times between June and September 2020. Multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of worsening food security compared to pre-pandemic baseline data. Qualitative interviews were conducted among a subset of participants to add understanding of the lived experience of food insecurity during the pandemic, beyond what quantitative measures could provide. Among 1,506 women, 28% had marginal to very low food security at baseline, and between 13.6-17.3% experienced worsening food security during pandemic measures. Women with household incomes &lt;$12,000/year were particularly vulnerable to worsening food insecurity, including those experiencing unemployment (OR: 2.06, 95% CI:1.36, 3.13), job loss (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.06), loss of financial support (OR: 1.91,95% CI: 1.23, 2.97), and those with reduced access to usual sources of food (OR: 7.67, 95% CI:4.78, 12.30). While the quantitative data suggest that relatively few women experienced worsening food security during the pandemic, the qualitative data suggest that many more women had difficulty accessing preferred and healthy foods and experienced disruption to social services, which typically facilitate the ability to access food. Women described how informal social systems (e.g., neighborhood gardens, sharing resources) bridged the gap left by more formal systems during this time. Taken together, these findings suggest that women with pre-existing socioeconomic vulnerability were disproportionately and negatively impacted by the social and economic disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions are needed to address structural vulnerabilities, improve safeguards to food security during times of distress, and harness the capacity of community-based support systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"18 5","pages":"1525 - 1544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12571-026-01693-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-026-01693-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the prevalence, severity, predictors, and lived experiences of food insecurity among women enrolled in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study in the USA in 2020, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that pre-existing socioeconomic and health-related disparities would heighten the risk of worsening food insecurity during the pandemic. The 10-item US Household Food Security Survey was administered to participants three times between June and September 2020. Multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of worsening food security compared to pre-pandemic baseline data. Qualitative interviews were conducted among a subset of participants to add understanding of the lived experience of food insecurity during the pandemic, beyond what quantitative measures could provide. Among 1,506 women, 28% had marginal to very low food security at baseline, and between 13.6-17.3% experienced worsening food security during pandemic measures. Women with household incomes <$12,000/year were particularly vulnerable to worsening food insecurity, including those experiencing unemployment (OR: 2.06, 95% CI:1.36, 3.13), job loss (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.06), loss of financial support (OR: 1.91,95% CI: 1.23, 2.97), and those with reduced access to usual sources of food (OR: 7.67, 95% CI:4.78, 12.30). While the quantitative data suggest that relatively few women experienced worsening food security during the pandemic, the qualitative data suggest that many more women had difficulty accessing preferred and healthy foods and experienced disruption to social services, which typically facilitate the ability to access food. Women described how informal social systems (e.g., neighborhood gardens, sharing resources) bridged the gap left by more formal systems during this time. Taken together, these findings suggest that women with pre-existing socioeconomic vulnerability were disproportionately and negatively impacted by the social and economic disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions are needed to address structural vulnerabilities, improve safeguards to food security during times of distress, and harness the capacity of community-based support systems.

COVID-19期间感染和未感染艾滋病毒的妇女以及血清阴性妇女粮食安全恶化的预测因素:一项混合方法研究
本研究旨在评估2020年COVID-19大流行高峰期参加美国妇女机构间艾滋病毒研究的妇女中粮食不安全的患病率、严重程度、预测因素和生活经历。我们假设,先前存在的社会经济和健康方面的差异会加剧疫情期间粮食不安全状况恶化的风险。这项包含10个项目的美国家庭食品安全调查在2020年6月至9月期间对参与者进行了三次。使用多水平混合效应有序逻辑回归模型来估计与大流行前基线数据相比粮食安全恶化的几率。在一部分参与者中进行了定性访谈,以增加对大流行期间粮食不安全生活经历的了解,这是定量措施所不能提供的。在1506名妇女中,28%的妇女在基线时的粮食安全处于边缘或极低水平,13.6-17.3%的妇女在采取大流行措施期间的粮食安全状况恶化。家庭年收入1.2万美元的妇女尤其容易受到日益恶化的粮食不安全的影响,包括那些正在经历失业(OR: 2.06, 95% CI:1.36, 3.13)、失业(OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.06)、失去经济支持(OR: 1.91,95% CI: 1.23, 2.97)和那些无法获得常规食物来源的妇女(OR: 7.67, 95% CI:4.78, 12.30)。定量数据表明,在大流行病期间粮食安全状况恶化的妇女相对较少,但定性数据表明,更多妇女难以获得首选和健康食品,社会服务中断,而社会服务通常有助于获得粮食。妇女们描述了非正式的社会制度(例如,社区花园,共享资源)如何弥补了这一时期更正式的制度留下的差距。综上所述,这些发现表明,先前就存在社会经济脆弱性的妇女受到COVID-19大流行造成的社会和经济破坏的负面影响尤为严重。需要采取干预措施,以解决结构性脆弱性,改善困难时期的粮食安全保障,并利用社区支持系统的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书