Data Driven and Mechanistic Modelling of PLGA Nanoparticle Formation in Hydrodynamic Flow-Focusing Microfluidics

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lab on a Chip Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1039/d6lc00612d
Muhammad Mubashar Saeed,Muhammad Turab,Lasse Højlund Eklund Thamdrup,Anja Boisen,Eadaoin Carthy,Nicholas Dunne,David Kinahan
{"title":"Data Driven and Mechanistic Modelling of PLGA Nanoparticle Formation in Hydrodynamic Flow-Focusing Microfluidics","authors":"Muhammad Mubashar Saeed,Muhammad Turab,Lasse Højlund Eklund Thamdrup,Anja Boisen,Eadaoin Carthy,Nicholas Dunne,David Kinahan","doi":"10.1039/d6lc00612d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microfluidic devices offer precise control over polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) synthesis. However, rational design of process optimization to obtain a target NPs sizes remains challenging because the relationship between operating parameters, mixing dynamics, and particle formation are not very linear Here, we integrate mechanistic analysis, statistical design of experiments (DoE), and machine learning (ML) to develop predictive and inverse-design frameworks for the synthesis of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) NPs. The effects of flow rate ratio (FRR), PLGA concentration, and microchannel width were systematically investigated using hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) microfluidic devices.Mixing time analysis demonstrated that NPs size is primarily governed by solvent to antisolvent mixing, with equivalent mixing times producing comparable particle sizes despite different combinations of FRR and channel width. A Box Behnken DoE yielded a highly predictive quadratic model (R² = 0.9979), identifying microchannel width as the dominant design variable, followed by PLGA concentration and FRR. Eight machine learning algorithms were subsequently developed and evaluated, with Gradient Boosting achieving the highest predictive accuracy (test R² = 0.9900, RMSE = 2.65 nm).Finally, inverse design experiments were performed for target NPs sizes of 80, 120, and 160 nm using DoE and a selected sub-set of ML models. Process conditions predicted by the developed models were implemented experimentally, and the Gradient Boosting model produced NP sizes in closest agreement with the preassigned targets, outperforming both the DoE and other ML models. This combined mechanistic and data driven framework enables reliable prediction and inverse design of PLGA nanoparticle synthesis and provides a practical strategy for intelligent, on-demand microfluidic manufacturing of polymeric nanomedicines.","PeriodicalId":85,"journal":{"name":"Lab on a Chip","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lab on a Chip","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6lc00612d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microfluidic devices offer precise control over polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) synthesis. However, rational design of process optimization to obtain a target NPs sizes remains challenging because the relationship between operating parameters, mixing dynamics, and particle formation are not very linear Here, we integrate mechanistic analysis, statistical design of experiments (DoE), and machine learning (ML) to develop predictive and inverse-design frameworks for the synthesis of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) NPs. The effects of flow rate ratio (FRR), PLGA concentration, and microchannel width were systematically investigated using hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) microfluidic devices.Mixing time analysis demonstrated that NPs size is primarily governed by solvent to antisolvent mixing, with equivalent mixing times producing comparable particle sizes despite different combinations of FRR and channel width. A Box Behnken DoE yielded a highly predictive quadratic model (R² = 0.9979), identifying microchannel width as the dominant design variable, followed by PLGA concentration and FRR. Eight machine learning algorithms were subsequently developed and evaluated, with Gradient Boosting achieving the highest predictive accuracy (test R² = 0.9900, RMSE = 2.65 nm).Finally, inverse design experiments were performed for target NPs sizes of 80, 120, and 160 nm using DoE and a selected sub-set of ML models. Process conditions predicted by the developed models were implemented experimentally, and the Gradient Boosting model produced NP sizes in closest agreement with the preassigned targets, outperforming both the DoE and other ML models. This combined mechanistic and data driven framework enables reliable prediction and inverse design of PLGA nanoparticle synthesis and provides a practical strategy for intelligent, on-demand microfluidic manufacturing of polymeric nanomedicines.
流体动力学聚焦微流体中PLGA纳米颗粒形成的数据驱动和机理建模
微流控装置提供精确控制聚合纳米颗粒(NPs)的合成。然而,合理设计工艺优化以获得目标NPs尺寸仍然具有挑战性,因为操作参数,混合动力学和颗粒形成之间的关系不是很线性。在这里,我们整合了机制分析,实验统计设计(DoE)和机器学习(ML)来开发聚乳酸-共乙醇酸(PLGA) NPs合成的预测和反设计框架。采用流体动力聚焦(HFF)微流控装置,系统研究了流量比(FRR)、PLGA浓度和微通道宽度的影响。混合时间分析表明,NPs的粒径主要受溶剂与反溶剂混合的影响,尽管FRR和通道宽度的组合不同,但相同的混合时间产生的粒径相当。Box Behnken DoE获得了一个高度预测的二次模型(R²= 0.9979),确定微通道宽度是主要设计变量,其次是PLGA浓度和FRR。随后开发并评估了8种机器学习算法,其中Gradient Boosting获得了最高的预测精度(检验R²= 0.9900,RMSE = 2.65 nm)。最后,利用DoE和选定的ML模型子集,对80、120和160 nm的目标NPs进行了反设计实验。通过实验实现了所开发模型预测的过程条件,梯度增强模型产生的NP大小与预先分配的目标最接近,优于DoE和其他ML模型。这种结合机理和数据驱动的框架能够可靠地预测和逆设计PLGA纳米颗粒合成,并为智能、按需微流控制造聚合物纳米药物提供实用策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lab on a Chip
Lab on a Chip 工程技术-化学综合
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Lab on a Chip is the premiere journal that publishes cutting-edge research in the field of miniaturization. By their very nature, microfluidic/nanofluidic/miniaturized systems are at the intersection of disciplines, spanning fundamental research to high-end application, which is reflected by the broad readership of the journal. Lab on a Chip publishes two types of papers on original research: full-length research papers and communications. Papers should demonstrate innovations, which can come from technical advancements or applications addressing pressing needs in globally important areas. The journal also publishes Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书