From Data to Decision: Interpretable and Reliable Heart Disease Risk Prediction.

Current health sciences journal Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-30 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.206
Andrei-Ionuț Spînu, Renato Constantin Ivănescu, Christiana Raluca Dănciulescu, Daniel-Robert Stănescu
{"title":"From Data to Decision: Interpretable and Reliable Heart Disease Risk Prediction.","authors":"Andrei-Ionuț Spînu, Renato Constantin Ivănescu, Christiana Raluca Dănciulescu, Daniel-Robert Stănescu","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, highlighting the need for accurate and clinically meaningful risk prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on a dataset of 918 patients with complete clinical information. The relationship between variables and disease presence were explored using correlation and dependence measure. To prediction was made using logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, and generalized additive models. The performances were evaluated using cross-validation, discrimination metrics, and calibration analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional and exercise-related variables, particularly Oldpeak, maximum heart rate, chest pain type, and ST slope showed the strongest correlation with disease presence. All models achieved AUROC values higher than 0.91. Logistic regression and generalized additive models performed similarly, with no statistically significant difference between them. Calibration analysis showed a good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heart disease prediction can be achieved with high accuracy using clinically accessible variables and interpretable models. Our findings suggest that simpler approaches remain suitable for practical clinical applications, while preserving transparency and usability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93963,"journal":{"name":"Current health sciences journal","volume":"52 2","pages":"206-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, highlighting the need for accurate and clinically meaningful risk prediction tool.

Methodology: A retrospective analysis was performed on a dataset of 918 patients with complete clinical information. The relationship between variables and disease presence were explored using correlation and dependence measure. To prediction was made using logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, and generalized additive models. The performances were evaluated using cross-validation, discrimination metrics, and calibration analysis.

Results: Functional and exercise-related variables, particularly Oldpeak, maximum heart rate, chest pain type, and ST slope showed the strongest correlation with disease presence. All models achieved AUROC values higher than 0.91. Logistic regression and generalized additive models performed similarly, with no statistically significant difference between them. Calibration analysis showed a good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities.

Conclusion: Heart disease prediction can be achieved with high accuracy using clinically accessible variables and interpretable models. Our findings suggest that simpler approaches remain suitable for practical clinical applications, while preserving transparency and usability.

从数据到决策:可解释和可靠的心脏病风险预测。
背景:心脏病是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因,强调需要准确和临床有意义的风险预测工具。方法:对918例具有完整临床信息的患者数据集进行回顾性分析。采用相关和依赖测度探讨各变量与疾病存在的关系。使用逻辑回归、线性判别分析和广义加性模型进行预测。使用交叉验证、鉴别指标和校准分析对其性能进行评估。结果:功能和运动相关变量,特别是Oldpeak、最大心率、胸痛类型和ST斜率与疾病存在最强的相关性。所有模型的AUROC值均大于0.91。逻辑回归和广义加性模型表现相似,两者之间无统计学显著差异。校正分析表明,预测概率与观测概率吻合良好。结论:利用临床可及的变量和可解释的模型,可以实现较高的心脏病预测精度。我们的研究结果表明,更简单的方法仍然适合实际临床应用,同时保持透明度和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书