The Role and Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Function Tests: A Systematic Review.

Current health sciences journal Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-30 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.141
Thomas Orpwood, Irina-Lavinia Soica
{"title":"The Role and Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Function Tests: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Thomas Orpwood, Irina-Lavinia Soica","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has highlighted its potential as a supportive tool in pulmonary function test (PFT) interpretation given the inherent biological variation, inter-rater variability, lack of confidence in result interpretation and restricted access within resource-constrained settings. This study aims to systematically review the published literature on the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based interpretation of PFTs and evaluate its implications for current and future clinical practice in healthcare. After screening, forty-seven publications met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to create a narrative summary. Four main over-arching themes were identified from the available literature. AI appears to consistently outperform non-specialists in diagnostic accuracy of PFTs and showed a synergistic effect when used as an adjunct in both specialist and non-specialist settings. Using AI software also had greater diagnostic accuracy than clinicians when presented with suboptimal or limited clinical information and investigations. It was also observed that the implementation of AI can address the issue of inter-rater variability by giving more consultant interpretations. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis saw the greatest accuracy with other conditions such as obstructive sleep apnoea showing limited evidence for the introduction of AI as a diagnostic tool. The evidence suggests that AI has the potential to play a significant role in the future of healthcare but should be used as an adjunctive tool as opposed to an independent diagnostic decision maker. One such way it could be utilised is as a triage/screening tool to help bridge the gap between primary and secondary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93963,"journal":{"name":"Current health sciences journal","volume":"52 2","pages":"141-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has highlighted its potential as a supportive tool in pulmonary function test (PFT) interpretation given the inherent biological variation, inter-rater variability, lack of confidence in result interpretation and restricted access within resource-constrained settings. This study aims to systematically review the published literature on the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based interpretation of PFTs and evaluate its implications for current and future clinical practice in healthcare. After screening, forty-seven publications met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to create a narrative summary. Four main over-arching themes were identified from the available literature. AI appears to consistently outperform non-specialists in diagnostic accuracy of PFTs and showed a synergistic effect when used as an adjunct in both specialist and non-specialist settings. Using AI software also had greater diagnostic accuracy than clinicians when presented with suboptimal or limited clinical information and investigations. It was also observed that the implementation of AI can address the issue of inter-rater variability by giving more consultant interpretations. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis saw the greatest accuracy with other conditions such as obstructive sleep apnoea showing limited evidence for the introduction of AI as a diagnostic tool. The evidence suggests that AI has the potential to play a significant role in the future of healthcare but should be used as an adjunctive tool as opposed to an independent diagnostic decision maker. One such way it could be utilised is as a triage/screening tool to help bridge the gap between primary and secondary care.

人工智能在肺功能检测中的作用和诊断准确性:系统综述。
人工智能(AI)的快速发展凸显了其作为肺功能测试(PFT)解释辅助工具的潜力,因为存在固有的生物学差异、评分者之间的可变性、对结果解释缺乏信心以及在资源受限的环境下限制获取。本研究旨在系统回顾已发表的关于基于人工智能的PFTs诊断准确性的文献,并评估其对当前和未来医疗保健临床实践的影响。经过筛选,47份出版物符合纳入标准,并进行了分析,以创建一个叙述性摘要。从现有文献中确定了四个主要的总体主题。人工智能在pft的诊断准确性方面似乎始终优于非专业人员,并且在专业和非专业环境中作为辅助工具使用时显示出协同效应。在临床信息和调查不够理想或有限的情况下,使用人工智能软件的诊断准确性也高于临床医生。还有人指出,人工智能的实施可以通过提供更多的顾问解释来解决汇率之间差异的问题。慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断在其他疾病(如阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停)中准确率最高,这表明将人工智能作为诊断工具的证据有限。有证据表明,人工智能有可能在未来的医疗保健中发挥重要作用,但应被用作辅助工具,而不是独立的诊断决策者。其中一种可以利用的方法是作为分流/筛查工具,帮助弥合初级和二级保健之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书