Trustees of the Pluriverse: Abderrahmane Taha's Islamic Covenantal Ethics and Epistemic Decoloniality

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2026-09-21 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1111/jore.70025
Achraf Guennouni Idrissi
{"title":"Trustees of the Pluriverse: Abderrahmane Taha's Islamic Covenantal Ethics and Epistemic Decoloniality","authors":"Achraf Guennouni Idrissi","doi":"10.1111/jore.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article explores Abderrahmane Taha's Islamic ethical philosophy in dialogue with decolonial thought, focusing on its contribution to pluriversality—a decolonial challenge to Western epistemic universalism. Pluriversality affirms diverse ways of knowing/being but also wrestles with tensions around epistemic incommensurability, normative ambiguity, and the risk of relativism. Drawing on Taha's <i>Trusteeship Paradigm</i> (<i>al-Iʾtimāniyya</i>), this intervention argues that his ethical metaphysics, particularly his formulation of <i>supported reason</i> (<i>al-ʿaql al-muʾayyad</i>), grounds pluriversality in a relational, dialogical, and morally anchored framework. It does so more robustly than comparable Islamic epistemic projects, including those of Syed Muhammad Naqib al-Attas and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Taha critiques secular tolerance as hierarchical and advances covenantal engagement and reciprocatory ethics as principles for navigating difference. His emphasis on ethical obligation, ontological responsibility, and plural rationalities reframes civilizational diversity as a covenant of mutual moral regard. This essay proposes a decolonial Islamic option: a covenantal pluriverse sustained through reciprocal moral responsibility across epistemic and ontological difference.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"54 3","pages":"214-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores Abderrahmane Taha's Islamic ethical philosophy in dialogue with decolonial thought, focusing on its contribution to pluriversality—a decolonial challenge to Western epistemic universalism. Pluriversality affirms diverse ways of knowing/being but also wrestles with tensions around epistemic incommensurability, normative ambiguity, and the risk of relativism. Drawing on Taha's Trusteeship Paradigm (al-Iʾtimāniyya), this intervention argues that his ethical metaphysics, particularly his formulation of supported reason (al-ʿaql al-muʾayyad), grounds pluriversality in a relational, dialogical, and morally anchored framework. It does so more robustly than comparable Islamic epistemic projects, including those of Syed Muhammad Naqib al-Attas and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Taha critiques secular tolerance as hierarchical and advances covenantal engagement and reciprocatory ethics as principles for navigating difference. His emphasis on ethical obligation, ontological responsibility, and plural rationalities reframes civilizational diversity as a covenant of mutual moral regard. This essay proposes a decolonial Islamic option: a covenantal pluriverse sustained through reciprocal moral responsibility across epistemic and ontological difference.

多元宇宙的托管人:阿卜杜勒·拉赫曼·塔哈的伊斯兰契约伦理和认识上的非殖民化
本文探讨了阿卜杜拉赫曼·塔哈的伊斯兰伦理哲学与非殖民化思想的对话,重点关注其对多元化的贡献——对西方知识普遍主义的非殖民化挑战。多元性肯定了认识/存在的不同方式,但也与认知不可通约性、规范性模糊性和相对主义风险的紧张关系作斗争。借鉴塔哈的托管范式(al- i - al- ā ā timāniyya),本文认为他的伦理形而上学,特别是他对支持理性的表述(al- al- ā ā aql al-mu - ā ā ayyad),在关系、对话和道德锚定的框架中建立了多元化的基础。它比类似的伊斯兰知识项目(包括赛义德•穆罕默德•纳齐布•阿塔斯和赛义德•侯赛因•纳斯尔的项目)做得更有力。塔哈批评世俗宽容是等级分明的,并将契约参与和互惠伦理作为引导差异的原则。他对伦理义务、本体论责任和多元理性的强调,将文明多样性重新构建为一种相互道德尊重的契约。本文提出了一个非殖民化的伊斯兰选择:一个通过跨越认知和本体论差异的互惠道德责任来维持的契约多元宇宙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书