Training imaging professionals on transgender-inclusive breast cancer screening practices.

IF 2.1
Arielle Martinez, Sarah Whitton, Jonah Yokoyama, Jules Madzia, Carson S Hartlage, Elizabeth Kelly, Madeline Schumacher, Delia Sosa, Harsimran Makkad, Catherine Xu, Rahul Patel, Sarah Pickle, Shanna Stryker
{"title":"Training imaging professionals on transgender-inclusive breast cancer screening practices.","authors":"Arielle Martinez, Sarah Whitton, Jonah Yokoyama, Jules Madzia, Carson S Hartlage, Elizabeth Kelly, Madeline Schumacher, Delia Sosa, Harsimran Makkad, Catherine Xu, Rahul Patel, Sarah Pickle, Shanna Stryker","doi":"10.1007/s10552-026-02241-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transgender/gender diverse (TGD) people are underscreened for breast cancer. A barrier to screening is anticipated discrimination during screening encounters. This pilot study evaluates a training session for breast imaging professionals (clinical support specialists, technologists, and radiologists) on LGBTQIA+-inclusive breast cancer screening visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Training topics included terminology, an overview of the guidelines, principles of trauma-informed care, and strategies for creating a welcoming and inclusive environment. Pre- and post-surveys gathered participants' demographic information, frequency of LGBTQIA+ patient interactions, and previous exposure to LGBTQIA+ training and assessed changes in knowledge, self-reported knowledge, and attitudes toward gender diversity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In pre-surveys, participants reported frequent interactions with LGBTQIA+ patients and little previous training. A 45-min didactic training that included storytelling of relevant experiences resulted in a significant increase in participants' self-reported knowledge of LGBTQIA+ terminology with a large effect size. After training, participants correctly answered more directly assessed knowledge questions (small effect size), with a trend toward attitudes more accepting of gender diversity (medium effect size), but neither reached statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continued efforts to implement and evaluate inclusive education for the entire clinical team are essential to enabling more inclusive and welcoming clinical encounters that will reduce the disparities in breast cancer screening for TGD populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520579,"journal":{"name":"Cancer causes & control : CCC","volume":"37 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13588859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer causes & control : CCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-026-02241-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Transgender/gender diverse (TGD) people are underscreened for breast cancer. A barrier to screening is anticipated discrimination during screening encounters. This pilot study evaluates a training session for breast imaging professionals (clinical support specialists, technologists, and radiologists) on LGBTQIA+-inclusive breast cancer screening visits.

Methods: Training topics included terminology, an overview of the guidelines, principles of trauma-informed care, and strategies for creating a welcoming and inclusive environment. Pre- and post-surveys gathered participants' demographic information, frequency of LGBTQIA+ patient interactions, and previous exposure to LGBTQIA+ training and assessed changes in knowledge, self-reported knowledge, and attitudes toward gender diversity.

Results: In pre-surveys, participants reported frequent interactions with LGBTQIA+ patients and little previous training. A 45-min didactic training that included storytelling of relevant experiences resulted in a significant increase in participants' self-reported knowledge of LGBTQIA+ terminology with a large effect size. After training, participants correctly answered more directly assessed knowledge questions (small effect size), with a trend toward attitudes more accepting of gender diversity (medium effect size), but neither reached statistical significance.

Conclusion: Continued efforts to implement and evaluate inclusive education for the entire clinical team are essential to enabling more inclusive and welcoming clinical encounters that will reduce the disparities in breast cancer screening for TGD populations.

对影像专业人员进行跨性别包容性乳腺癌筛查实践培训。
目的:跨性别/性别多样化(TGD)人群乳腺癌筛查不足。筛查的一个障碍是在筛查过程中预期的歧视。本试点研究评估了乳房成像专业人员(临床支持专家、技术人员和放射科医生)关于LGBTQIA+包括乳腺癌筛查访问的培训课程。方法:培训主题包括术语、指导方针概述、创伤知情护理原则以及创造温馨和包容环境的策略。调查前后收集了参与者的人口统计信息、LGBTQIA与患者互动的频率、之前接受过LGBTQIA+培训的情况,并评估了知识的变化、自我报告的知识和对性别多样性的态度。结果:在预调查中,参与者报告了与LGBTQIA+患者的频繁互动,而之前的培训很少。45分钟的教学训练,包括讲故事的相关经验,导致参与者自我报告的LGBTQIA+术语知识显著增加,具有较大的效应量。培训后,参与者正确回答了更多直接评估的知识问题(小效应量),态度倾向于更接受性别多样性(中等效应量),但两者都没有达到统计学意义。结论:继续努力实施和评估整个临床团队的包容性教育对于实现更具包容性和欢迎的临床接触至关重要,这将减少TGD人群乳腺癌筛查的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书