Cognitive and behavioral benefits of newspaper reading in community-dwelling older adults: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.9 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2026-09-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2026.1929793
Mamoru Sato, Sawako Negoto, Shinya Nakano, Chihoko Urata, Tetsuya Ioji, Hideya Kodama, Emi Yoshimura, Yukinori Tasaki, Shinichiro Goroku, Kiichiro Morita, Yoshihisa Shoji
{"title":"Cognitive and behavioral benefits of newspaper reading in community-dwelling older adults: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mamoru Sato, Sawako Negoto, Shinya Nakano, Chihoko Urata, Tetsuya Ioji, Hideya Kodama, Emi Yoshimura, Yukinori Tasaki, Shinichiro Goroku, Kiichiro Morita, Yoshihisa Shoji","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2026.1929793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are reports suggesting that reading newspapers is an accessible daily intellectual activity that may help prevent neurocognitive disorders, while no prospective studies have accurately investigated its effectiveness on cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to explore the effects of reading newspapers on cognitive function and activity levels in community-dwelling older adults. The study included 163 non-subscribers aged 60 years or older; after screening, 64 participants were selected. Participants were randomly assigned to either the newspaper reading group (n = 31) or the non-reading group (n = 32), and a 26-week randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. One person was disqualified because they could not be contacted. The newspaper reading group was instructed to read the newspaper at least four days a week, and compliance was verified by checking entries on activity log sheets. In addition, both groups were assessed before and after the trial. The primary outcome was cognitive function assessed using the Japanese Version of the MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MoCA-J). Secondary outcomes included the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-J), the Japanese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15-J), the Life-Space Assessment (LSA), and the Vitality Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the changes in these test items after 26 weeks, the newspaper reading group showed significantly better results than the non-reading group for the MoCA-J (difference: 1.47 [95% CI: 0.31-2.63], p = 0.013), GDS-15-J (difference: -1.85 [95% CI: -3.01 to -0.68], p = 0.002), and LSA (difference: 14.74 [95% CI: 7.13-22.35], p < 0.001). A significant trend was also observed in the newspaper reading group for the MMSE-J (difference: 2.46 [95% CI: 1.34-3.58], p = 0.065).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that reading newspapers is a low-cost, self-directed intervention that can be easily incorporated into preventive care for community-dwelling older adults and may have beneficial effects on cognitive function and activity levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"1929793"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13585924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2026.1929793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are reports suggesting that reading newspapers is an accessible daily intellectual activity that may help prevent neurocognitive disorders, while no prospective studies have accurately investigated its effectiveness on cognitive function.

Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to explore the effects of reading newspapers on cognitive function and activity levels in community-dwelling older adults. The study included 163 non-subscribers aged 60 years or older; after screening, 64 participants were selected. Participants were randomly assigned to either the newspaper reading group (n = 31) or the non-reading group (n = 32), and a 26-week randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. One person was disqualified because they could not be contacted. The newspaper reading group was instructed to read the newspaper at least four days a week, and compliance was verified by checking entries on activity log sheets. In addition, both groups were assessed before and after the trial. The primary outcome was cognitive function assessed using the Japanese Version of the MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MoCA-J). Secondary outcomes included the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-J), the Japanese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15-J), the Life-Space Assessment (LSA), and the Vitality Index.

Results: When comparing the changes in these test items after 26 weeks, the newspaper reading group showed significantly better results than the non-reading group for the MoCA-J (difference: 1.47 [95% CI: 0.31-2.63], p = 0.013), GDS-15-J (difference: -1.85 [95% CI: -3.01 to -0.68], p = 0.002), and LSA (difference: 14.74 [95% CI: 7.13-22.35], p < 0.001). A significant trend was also observed in the newspaper reading group for the MMSE-J (difference: 2.46 [95% CI: 1.34-3.58], p = 0.065).

Discussion: These findings suggest that reading newspapers is a low-cost, self-directed intervention that can be easily incorporated into preventive care for community-dwelling older adults and may have beneficial effects on cognitive function and activity levels.

社区老年人阅读报纸的认知和行为益处:一项可行性随机对照试验。
导读:有报道表明,阅读报纸是一种日常的智力活动,可能有助于预防神经认知障碍,但没有前瞻性研究准确地调查其对认知功能的有效性。方法:本研究是一项随机对照试验,旨在探讨阅读报纸对社区老年人认知功能和活动水平的影响。该研究包括163名60岁或以上的非订阅者;经筛选,64名受试者入选。参与者被随机分为报纸阅读组(n = 31)和非阅读组(n = 32),进行了为期26周的随机对照试验(RCT)。有一个人因为联系不上而被取消资格。阅读报纸的小组被要求每周至少阅读四天报纸,并通过检查活动日志表的条目来验证是否遵守。此外,两组在试验前后均进行了评估。主要结果是使用日本版蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA-J)评估认知功能。次要结果包括迷你精神状态检查(MMSE-J)、日本版老年抑郁量表-15 (GDS-15-J)、生活空间评估(LSA)和活力指数。结果:在比较26周后这些测试项目的变化时,报纸阅读组在MoCA-J(差异:1.47 [95% CI: 0.31-2.63], p = 0.013)、GDS-15-J(差异:-1.85 [95% CI: -3.01至-0.68],p = 0.002)和LSA(差异:14.74 [95% CI: 7.13-22.35], p < 0.001)方面的结果明显优于非阅读组。报纸阅读组的MMSE-J也有显著的趋势(差异:2.46 [95% CI: 1.34-3.58], p = 0.065)。讨论:这些发现表明,阅读报纸是一种低成本、自我导向的干预措施,可以很容易地纳入社区老年人的预防保健,并可能对认知功能和活动水平产生有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书