Higher early radiographic bone healing scores with popliteus muscle preservation during tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs.

IF 1.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
S Sassaroli, A Salvaggio, F Roggiolani, M Fordellone, F Ciabocco, A Palumbo Piccionello
{"title":"Higher early radiographic bone healing scores with popliteus muscle preservation during tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs.","authors":"S Sassaroli, A Salvaggio, F Roggiolani, M Fordellone, F Ciabocco, A Palumbo Piccionello","doi":"10.1111/jsap.70204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare early radiographic bone healing 45 days after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy performed with popliteus muscle detachment versus a modified technique preserving the muscle and to determine whether muscle preservation influences post-operative osteotomy stability through measurement of rock-back.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective, blinded, randomised clinical study (2022 to 2025), 100 client-owned dogs with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture were allocated to traditional surgery (n = 50) or popliteus-sparing surgery (n = 50). Radiographic assessment was performed preoperatively, immediately post-operatively and 45 days after surgery. Bone healing was evaluated using two validated radiographic scoring systems. Osteotomy stability was assessed by measuring the change in tibial plateau angle between the immediate post-operative and 45-day radiographs. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for baseline clinical variables. A P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dogs undergoing popliteus-sparing surgery demonstrated higher bone healing scores at 45 days, with an adjusted mean difference of 1.95 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.99) on the 10-point bone healing scale and 1.87 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 2.86) on the modified radiographic union scale. There was no clinically relevant difference in post-operative tibial plateau angle change between groups, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.26 degrees (95% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.63). No major intraoperative vascular complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy performed without detachment of the popliteus muscle represents a safe and effective alternative to the traditional technique. Popliteus muscle preservation during tibial plateau levelling osteotomy was associated with higher radiographic bone healing scores at 45 days, without evidence of increased osteotomy instability. Whether this radiographic difference translates into improved clinical recovery or limb function remains unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.70204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare early radiographic bone healing 45 days after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy performed with popliteus muscle detachment versus a modified technique preserving the muscle and to determine whether muscle preservation influences post-operative osteotomy stability through measurement of rock-back.

Materials and methods: In this prospective, blinded, randomised clinical study (2022 to 2025), 100 client-owned dogs with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture were allocated to traditional surgery (n = 50) or popliteus-sparing surgery (n = 50). Radiographic assessment was performed preoperatively, immediately post-operatively and 45 days after surgery. Bone healing was evaluated using two validated radiographic scoring systems. Osteotomy stability was assessed by measuring the change in tibial plateau angle between the immediate post-operative and 45-day radiographs. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for baseline clinical variables. A P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Dogs undergoing popliteus-sparing surgery demonstrated higher bone healing scores at 45 days, with an adjusted mean difference of 1.95 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.99) on the 10-point bone healing scale and 1.87 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 2.86) on the modified radiographic union scale. There was no clinically relevant difference in post-operative tibial plateau angle change between groups, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.26 degrees (95% confidence interval -0.10 to 0.63). No major intraoperative vascular complications were recorded.

Clinical significance: Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy performed without detachment of the popliteus muscle represents a safe and effective alternative to the traditional technique. Popliteus muscle preservation during tibial plateau levelling osteotomy was associated with higher radiographic bone healing scores at 45 days, without evidence of increased osteotomy instability. Whether this radiographic difference translates into improved clinical recovery or limb function remains unknown.

在狗胫骨平台平截骨术中保留腘肌的早期x线骨愈合评分更高。
目的:比较腘肌脱离胫骨平台平截骨术后45天的早期x线骨愈合与改良的保肌技术,并通过测量岩石-背部来确定保肌是否影响术后截骨稳定性。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性、盲法、随机临床研究(2022年至2025年)中,100只单侧颅十字韧带破裂的客户犬被分配到传统手术(n = 50)和保留腘肌手术(n = 50)。术前、术后及术后45天分别进行影像学评估。使用两种有效的放射评分系统评估骨愈合。通过测量术后即刻和45天x线片胫骨平台角的变化来评估截骨稳定性。多变量线性回归模型用于调整基线临床变量。p值结果:接受保留腘窝手术的狗在45天表现出更高的骨愈合评分,在10点骨愈合量表上调整后的平均差异为1.95(95%可信区间0.91至2.99),在改良放射学愈合量表上调整后的平均差异为1.87(95%可信区间0.88至2.86)。两组术后胫骨平台角度变化无临床相关性,调整后平均差异为0.26度(95%可信区间为-0.10 ~ 0.63)。术中无重大血管并发症。临床意义:在不脱离腘肌的情况下进行胫骨平台平截骨是传统技术的一种安全有效的替代方法。胫骨平台平截骨术中腘肌保留与45天较高的x线骨愈合评分相关,无证据表明截骨不稳定性增加。这种影像学差异是否转化为临床恢复或肢体功能的改善尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书