Managing solar abundance through smart household flexibility: A socio-technical assessment of Australia's Solar Sharer Offer

IF 6.1 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Smart Energy Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.segy.2026.100269
Alireza Ganjovi, Saman A. Gorji
{"title":"Managing solar abundance through smart household flexibility: A socio-technical assessment of Australia's Solar Sharer Offer","authors":"Alireza Ganjovi,&nbsp;Saman A. Gorji","doi":"10.1016/j.segy.2026.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Australia's rapid growth in rooftop photovoltaic generation is creating periods of low operational demand, negative wholesale prices and renewable-electricity surplus. Tariff-based demand response may help align household consumption with these periods, but its contribution depends on resource capability, availability, accessibility and delivered response. This study develops a socio-technical assessment of Australia's Solar Sharer Offer, which provides eligible households with a 3-h zero-price electricity window. The framework integrates a Flexibility Access Assessment with household load-shifting, aggregate participation, bill-impact and sensitivity analyses, supported by empirical plausibility benchmarking. Five stylised household configurations provide 0-12 kWh of flexible energy per event. Delivering a 263 MW demand increase for 3 h requires 1.315 million appliance-only households or 65,750 highly automated households under ideal conditions; with 75% resource availability and 80% response delivery, these requirements increase to approximately 2.19 million and 109,583, respectively. Using matched 2026-27 tariffs, central annual household net value ranges from -AUD 100.9 to AUD 954.2, depending on flexibility capability and whether free-period savings offset the approximately 2.62 c/kWh higher SSO charge on remaining non-free consumption. Australian trials support the plausibility of selected flexibility assumptions but do not validate voluntary Solar Sharer Offer response. The results show that tariff signals can support renewable-energy absorption, but their system value depends on delivered flexibility, coordination and equitable access to enabling technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34738,"journal":{"name":"Smart Energy","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955226000444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australia's rapid growth in rooftop photovoltaic generation is creating periods of low operational demand, negative wholesale prices and renewable-electricity surplus. Tariff-based demand response may help align household consumption with these periods, but its contribution depends on resource capability, availability, accessibility and delivered response. This study develops a socio-technical assessment of Australia's Solar Sharer Offer, which provides eligible households with a 3-h zero-price electricity window. The framework integrates a Flexibility Access Assessment with household load-shifting, aggregate participation, bill-impact and sensitivity analyses, supported by empirical plausibility benchmarking. Five stylised household configurations provide 0-12 kWh of flexible energy per event. Delivering a 263 MW demand increase for 3 h requires 1.315 million appliance-only households or 65,750 highly automated households under ideal conditions; with 75% resource availability and 80% response delivery, these requirements increase to approximately 2.19 million and 109,583, respectively. Using matched 2026-27 tariffs, central annual household net value ranges from -AUD 100.9 to AUD 954.2, depending on flexibility capability and whether free-period savings offset the approximately 2.62 c/kWh higher SSO charge on remaining non-free consumption. Australian trials support the plausibility of selected flexibility assumptions but do not validate voluntary Solar Sharer Offer response. The results show that tariff signals can support renewable-energy absorption, but their system value depends on delivered flexibility, coordination and equitable access to enabling technologies.
通过智能家庭灵活性管理太阳能资源:澳大利亚太阳能共享者报价的社会技术评估
澳大利亚屋顶光伏发电的快速增长正在创造低运营需求、负批发价格和可再生电力过剩的时期。基于关税的需求响应可能有助于使家庭消费与这些时期保持一致,但其贡献取决于资源能力、可用性、可及性和交付的响应。本研究对澳大利亚的太阳能共享方案进行了社会技术评估,该方案为符合条件的家庭提供了3小时零电价的电力窗口。该框架将灵活性获取评估与家庭负荷转移、总体参与、账单影响和敏感性分析相结合,并以实证合理性基准为支持。五种风格的家庭配置提供0-12 千瓦时的灵活能源每事件。在理想条件下,为3 小时提供263 兆瓦的需求增长需要131.5万户纯电器家庭或65,750户高度自动化家庭;随着75%的资源可用性和80%的响应交付,这些需求分别增加到大约219万和109,583。使用匹配的2026-27年电价,中央年度家庭净值从- 100.9澳元到954.2澳元不等,具体取决于灵活性,以及免费期间的节省是否抵消了剩余非免费消费的大约2.62 c/kWh的高SSO费用。澳大利亚的试验支持选定的灵活性假设的合理性,但不验证自愿太阳能共享者提供回应。结果表明,电价信号可以支持可再生能源的吸收,但其系统价值取决于所提供的灵活性、协调性和对有利技术的公平获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Energy
Smart Energy Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
73 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书