Willingness to adopt mobility as a service in a pre-deployment context: Evidence from Bangladesh using a dual-method framework

IF 4.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Journal of Public Transportation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubtr.2026.100176
Mahbub Hassan, Pretom Sarkar, Md Kamrul Islam, M M Hafizur Rahman
{"title":"Willingness to adopt mobility as a service in a pre-deployment context: Evidence from Bangladesh using a dual-method framework","authors":"Mahbub Hassan,&nbsp;Pretom Sarkar,&nbsp;Md Kamrul Islam,&nbsp;M M Hafizur Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2026.100176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines prospective willingness to adopt Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in Bangladesh, where no integrated MaaS platform was operational during the study period. A scenario-based online survey of 518 respondents across all eight administrative divisions was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The conceptual model builds on UTAUT2 and incorporates platform trust, perceived risk, and privacy concern. The PLS-SEM model explained 70.8% of the variance in willingness to adopt MaaS and demonstrated favorable out-of-sample predictive performance. Performance expectancy and platform trust showed the strongest positive associations with willingness, whereas perceived risk and privacy concern were negatively associated with it. The fsQCA results further revealed multiple configurations associated with both high and low willingness, indicating that prospective MaaS acceptance is configurational rather than driven by a single condition. Overall, the findings suggest that prospective MaaS acceptance in Bangladesh depends on both anticipated mobility benefits and confidence in platform operation. From a policy perspective, the results support staged real-world experimentation rather than immediate large-scale deployment, with early pilots emphasizing service interoperability, reliable payment and problem-resolution mechanisms, transparent data governance, operator coordination, and inclusive access. Such evidence can help policymakers assess whether prospective willingness can be translated into sustainable MaaS implementation under actual operating conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X26000305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines prospective willingness to adopt Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in Bangladesh, where no integrated MaaS platform was operational during the study period. A scenario-based online survey of 518 respondents across all eight administrative divisions was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The conceptual model builds on UTAUT2 and incorporates platform trust, perceived risk, and privacy concern. The PLS-SEM model explained 70.8% of the variance in willingness to adopt MaaS and demonstrated favorable out-of-sample predictive performance. Performance expectancy and platform trust showed the strongest positive associations with willingness, whereas perceived risk and privacy concern were negatively associated with it. The fsQCA results further revealed multiple configurations associated with both high and low willingness, indicating that prospective MaaS acceptance is configurational rather than driven by a single condition. Overall, the findings suggest that prospective MaaS acceptance in Bangladesh depends on both anticipated mobility benefits and confidence in platform operation. From a policy perspective, the results support staged real-world experimentation rather than immediate large-scale deployment, with early pilots emphasizing service interoperability, reliable payment and problem-resolution mechanisms, transparent data governance, operator coordination, and inclusive access. Such evidence can help policymakers assess whether prospective willingness can be translated into sustainable MaaS implementation under actual operating conditions.
在部署前环境中采用移动性即服务的意愿:来自孟加拉国使用双方法框架的证据
本研究考察了孟加拉国采用移动即服务(MaaS)的预期意愿,在研究期间,孟加拉国没有集成的MaaS平台。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)对中国8个行政区划的518名受访者进行了基于场景的在线调查。概念模型建立在UTAUT2之上,并结合了平台信任、感知风险和隐私问题。PLS-SEM模型解释了采用MaaS意愿方差的70.8%,并显示出良好的样本外预测性能。表现预期和平台信任与意愿表现出最强的正相关,而感知风险和隐私担忧与意愿呈负相关。fsQCA结果进一步揭示了与高意愿和低意愿相关的多种配置,表明预期的MaaS接受度是配置的,而不是由单一条件驱动的。总体而言,研究结果表明,孟加拉国对MaaS的接受程度取决于预期的移动性效益和对平台运营的信心。从政策角度来看,结果支持分阶段的现实世界实验,而不是立即大规模部署,早期试点强调服务互操作性、可靠的支付和问题解决机制、透明的数据治理、运营商协调和包容性接入。这些证据可以帮助决策者评估在实际操作条件下,预期意愿是否可以转化为可持续的MaaS实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书