Cristina Pedrosa Ortega, Elia García Martí, Mª del Carmen Ruiz Jiménez, Rocío Martínez Jiménez, Mª Jesús Hernández-Ortiz
{"title":"Towards board and executive gender diversity from an institutional and quota perspective: Evidence from European companies","authors":"Cristina Pedrosa Ortega, Elia García Martí, Mª del Carmen Ruiz Jiménez, Rocío Martínez Jiménez, Mª Jesús Hernández-Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2026.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender quotas have emerged as key institutional mechanisms for promoting gender equality among corporate boards across Europe, yet their effectiveness remains uneven across national contexts. This study examines how institutional environments and quota legislation shape gender diversity in corporate governance. Using a sample of 2,406 listed companies from 33 European countries, the analysis combines linear regression models and nonparametric tests to assess the effects of national gender equality and quota regimes. The findings indicate that higher levels of gender equality and the presence of mandatory quota legislation are associated with significantly higher levels of board gender diversity and overall diversity performance. However, the results also reveal a more limited effect on executive management representation, suggesting that improvements at the board level do not automatically translate into broader gender equality within firms. Furthermore, only a minority of companies achieve gender-balanced boards, although this proportion is substantially higher in countries with binding quota systems. These findings highlight the importance of institutional complementarities and provide evidence that mandatory quota systems are more effective than recommended frameworks, while also underscoring the need for complementary organizational and policy measures to advance gender equality beyond the boardroom.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":"32 3","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883426000264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gender quotas have emerged as key institutional mechanisms for promoting gender equality among corporate boards across Europe, yet their effectiveness remains uneven across national contexts. This study examines how institutional environments and quota legislation shape gender diversity in corporate governance. Using a sample of 2,406 listed companies from 33 European countries, the analysis combines linear regression models and nonparametric tests to assess the effects of national gender equality and quota regimes. The findings indicate that higher levels of gender equality and the presence of mandatory quota legislation are associated with significantly higher levels of board gender diversity and overall diversity performance. However, the results also reveal a more limited effect on executive management representation, suggesting that improvements at the board level do not automatically translate into broader gender equality within firms. Furthermore, only a minority of companies achieve gender-balanced boards, although this proportion is substantially higher in countries with binding quota systems. These findings highlight the importance of institutional complementarities and provide evidence that mandatory quota systems are more effective than recommended frameworks, while also underscoring the need for complementary organizational and policy measures to advance gender equality beyond the boardroom.
期刊介绍:
European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge