Towards board and executive gender diversity from an institutional and quota perspective: Evidence from European companies

IF 6.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Cristina Pedrosa Ortega, Elia García Martí, Mª del Carmen Ruiz Jiménez, Rocío Martínez Jiménez, Mª Jesús Hernández-Ortiz
{"title":"Towards board and executive gender diversity from an institutional and quota perspective: Evidence from European companies","authors":"Cristina Pedrosa Ortega,&nbsp;Elia García Martí,&nbsp;Mª del Carmen Ruiz Jiménez,&nbsp;Rocío Martínez Jiménez,&nbsp;Mª Jesús Hernández-Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2026.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender quotas have emerged as key institutional mechanisms for promoting gender equality among corporate boards across Europe, yet their effectiveness remains uneven across national contexts. This study examines how institutional environments and quota legislation shape gender diversity in corporate governance. Using a sample of 2,406 listed companies from 33 European countries, the analysis combines linear regression models and nonparametric tests to assess the effects of national gender equality and quota regimes. The findings indicate that higher levels of gender equality and the presence of mandatory quota legislation are associated with significantly higher levels of board gender diversity and overall diversity performance. However, the results also reveal a more limited effect on executive management representation, suggesting that improvements at the board level do not automatically translate into broader gender equality within firms. Furthermore, only a minority of companies achieve gender-balanced boards, although this proportion is substantially higher in countries with binding quota systems. These findings highlight the importance of institutional complementarities and provide evidence that mandatory quota systems are more effective than recommended frameworks, while also underscoring the need for complementary organizational and policy measures to advance gender equality beyond the boardroom.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":"32 3","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883426000264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender quotas have emerged as key institutional mechanisms for promoting gender equality among corporate boards across Europe, yet their effectiveness remains uneven across national contexts. This study examines how institutional environments and quota legislation shape gender diversity in corporate governance. Using a sample of 2,406 listed companies from 33 European countries, the analysis combines linear regression models and nonparametric tests to assess the effects of national gender equality and quota regimes. The findings indicate that higher levels of gender equality and the presence of mandatory quota legislation are associated with significantly higher levels of board gender diversity and overall diversity performance. However, the results also reveal a more limited effect on executive management representation, suggesting that improvements at the board level do not automatically translate into broader gender equality within firms. Furthermore, only a minority of companies achieve gender-balanced boards, although this proportion is substantially higher in countries with binding quota systems. These findings highlight the importance of institutional complementarities and provide evidence that mandatory quota systems are more effective than recommended frameworks, while also underscoring the need for complementary organizational and policy measures to advance gender equality beyond the boardroom.
从制度和配额的角度看董事会和高管的性别多样性:来自欧洲公司的证据
性别配额已成为促进欧洲各地公司董事会性别平等的关键制度机制,但其有效性在各国背景下仍然参差不齐。本研究探讨制度环境和配额立法如何塑造公司治理中的性别多样性。利用来自33个欧洲国家的2,406家上市公司的样本,分析结合了线性回归模型和非参数检验来评估国家性别平等和配额制度的影响。研究结果表明,更高水平的性别平等和强制性配额立法的存在与董事会性别多样性和整体多样性绩效的显著提高有关。然而,研究结果也显示,对高管代表的影响更为有限,这表明董事会层面的改善并不会自动转化为公司内部更广泛的性别平等。此外,只有少数公司实现了董事会性别平衡,尽管这一比例在有约束性配额制度的国家要高得多。这些调查结果强调了机构互补性的重要性,并提供证据证明强制性配额制度比建议的框架更有效,同时也强调需要采取补充性的组织和政策措施,以促进董事会以外的性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书