Bacterial assembly and yield associations across abundance classes at the soil–water interface under long-term rice–crab co-culture

IF 9.2 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Weijing Li, Yang Xu, Hongyuan Wang, Yitao Zhang, Wentao Sun, Xiushuang Zhang, Bingqian Fan, Limei Zhai, Hongbin Liu
{"title":"Bacterial assembly and yield associations across abundance classes at the soil–water interface under long-term rice–crab co-culture","authors":"Weijing Li,&nbsp;Yang Xu,&nbsp;Hongyuan Wang,&nbsp;Yitao Zhang,&nbsp;Wentao Sun,&nbsp;Xiushuang Zhang,&nbsp;Bingqian Fan,&nbsp;Limei Zhai,&nbsp;Hongbin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2026.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How long-term rice–crab co-culture changes bacterial organization across the soil–water interface and how these changes relate to crop productivity remain unclear. We compared abundant, intermediate, and rare bacterial subcommunities in paired overlying water and interface soil from six rice monoculture and six rice–crab co-culture plots, each managed for more than 20 years. Co-culture increased grain yield by 14.07%. Alpha diversity remained unchanged in overlying water, whereas the richness of intermediate and rare taxa declined in interface soil, together with the Shannon diversity of rare taxa. Community composition changed across all abundance classes in both habitats. Dispersal limitation predominated in abundant taxa, while homogeneous selection was more important for rare taxa. Co-culture increased variable selection among intermediate taxa, particularly in interface soil. Networks became larger and more connected in overlying water but smaller and more modular in interface soil. Urease, alkaline phosphatase, and β-glucosidase activities increased significantly under co-culture only in interface soil. Yield was associated with the composition of all three abundance classes, and rare community composition accounted for a significant unique fraction of yield variation in interface soil (19.62%). Yield-associated potential keystones occurred mainly among intermediate taxa in overlying water and abundant taxa in interface soil, including a Rhodocyclaceae-affiliated taxon and <em>Luteolibacter</em>, respectively. Together, higher productivity under rice–crab co-culture coincided with changes in bacterial composition, assembly, and network organization that differed between habitats and abundance classes. Interface soil emerged as the principal habitat in which microbial reorganization, enzyme activity, nutrient transformation potential, and rice yield converged.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916126000964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How long-term rice–crab co-culture changes bacterial organization across the soil–water interface and how these changes relate to crop productivity remain unclear. We compared abundant, intermediate, and rare bacterial subcommunities in paired overlying water and interface soil from six rice monoculture and six rice–crab co-culture plots, each managed for more than 20 years. Co-culture increased grain yield by 14.07%. Alpha diversity remained unchanged in overlying water, whereas the richness of intermediate and rare taxa declined in interface soil, together with the Shannon diversity of rare taxa. Community composition changed across all abundance classes in both habitats. Dispersal limitation predominated in abundant taxa, while homogeneous selection was more important for rare taxa. Co-culture increased variable selection among intermediate taxa, particularly in interface soil. Networks became larger and more connected in overlying water but smaller and more modular in interface soil. Urease, alkaline phosphatase, and β-glucosidase activities increased significantly under co-culture only in interface soil. Yield was associated with the composition of all three abundance classes, and rare community composition accounted for a significant unique fraction of yield variation in interface soil (19.62%). Yield-associated potential keystones occurred mainly among intermediate taxa in overlying water and abundant taxa in interface soil, including a Rhodocyclaceae-affiliated taxon and Luteolibacter, respectively. Together, higher productivity under rice–crab co-culture coincided with changes in bacterial composition, assembly, and network organization that differed between habitats and abundance classes. Interface soil emerged as the principal habitat in which microbial reorganization, enzyme activity, nutrient transformation potential, and rice yield converged.
长期稻蟹共培养下土壤-水界面细菌聚集与产量关联
长期稻蟹共培养如何改变土壤-水界面上的细菌组织以及这些变化与作物生产力的关系尚不清楚。我们比较了6个水稻单栽培和6个水稻蟹共栽培地块上覆水和界面土壤中丰富、中等和罕见的细菌亚群落,每个地块管理超过20年。共栽增产14.07%。上覆水体α多样性基本保持不变,界面土中、稀有类群丰富度下降,稀有类群Shannon多样性下降。群落组成在两种生境中均发生了变化。丰富的类群以扩散限制为主,而稀有的类群则以同质选择为主。共培养增加了中间类群的变量选择,特别是界面土。在上覆的水中,网络变得更大、更紧密相连,而在界面土壤中,网络变得更小、更模块化。仅界面土共培养,脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性显著提高。产量与3个丰度等级的组成均相关,且稀有群落组成对界面土产量变化的贡献率显著(19.62%)。与产量相关的潜在关键因素主要发生在上覆水体的中间类群和界面土壤的丰富类群中,分别包括一个红环类类群和一个木犀草属类群。综上所述,稻蟹共培养条件下的高产量与不同生境和丰度等级的细菌组成、组合和网络组织的变化相一致。界面土是微生物重组、酶活性、养分转化潜力和水稻产量聚集的主要生境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书