The Dynamic Collaborative Governance Continuum Model: A Theory-Building Systematic Review of Success and Failure Factors

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Mutia Rahmah, Amy Yayuk Sri Rahayu, Irfan Ridwan Maksum, Muchlis Hamdi
{"title":"The Dynamic Collaborative Governance Continuum Model: A Theory-Building Systematic Review of Success and Failure Factors","authors":"Mutia Rahmah,&nbsp;Amy Yayuk Sri Rahayu,&nbsp;Irfan Ridwan Maksum,&nbsp;Muchlis Hamdi","doi":"10.1002/pa.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The current study aims to analyze the development of collaborative governance (CG), the factors that influence its success and failure, as well as to provide a conceptual framework for dynamic CG. This study employed a systematic evaluation of the literature, based on 45 papers out of 712 from 2014 to 2023, addressing CG as a key aspect in solving wicked problems. The study found three important things. First, temporal analysis suggests that the literature on CG has experienced three different phases: institutionalization, complexity and dynamics, besides the adaptive and digital age, therefore exhibiting a paradigmatic shift from a static paradigm to a more dynamic and adaptive one. Second, the thematic synthesis has identified themes of success, such as institutional design, learning and adaptation, and resources and capability, and themes of failure, with conflicts of interest and complexities being identified as the most common problems. Third, the study contributed a novel theory, the dynamic CG continuum model (DCGCM), which conceptualizes CG as a continuum with three stages (fragmented, transitional, and adaptive collaboration) evolving through three dimensions of maturity (structural-institutional, relational processes, adaptive learning) and two visible transition mechanisms. The DCGCM overcomes the limitations of the remaining CG models by unifying and coherently integrating temporal dimensions, transition processes, positional typologies, and the inherent non-linearity of collaborative development. The implications of these findings are tremendous, conceptually and practically, for program designers, policy makers, and researchers attempting to understand, diagnose, and drive the growth of CG across a number of sectoral and geographic contexts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aims to analyze the development of collaborative governance (CG), the factors that influence its success and failure, as well as to provide a conceptual framework for dynamic CG. This study employed a systematic evaluation of the literature, based on 45 papers out of 712 from 2014 to 2023, addressing CG as a key aspect in solving wicked problems. The study found three important things. First, temporal analysis suggests that the literature on CG has experienced three different phases: institutionalization, complexity and dynamics, besides the adaptive and digital age, therefore exhibiting a paradigmatic shift from a static paradigm to a more dynamic and adaptive one. Second, the thematic synthesis has identified themes of success, such as institutional design, learning and adaptation, and resources and capability, and themes of failure, with conflicts of interest and complexities being identified as the most common problems. Third, the study contributed a novel theory, the dynamic CG continuum model (DCGCM), which conceptualizes CG as a continuum with three stages (fragmented, transitional, and adaptive collaboration) evolving through three dimensions of maturity (structural-institutional, relational processes, adaptive learning) and two visible transition mechanisms. The DCGCM overcomes the limitations of the remaining CG models by unifying and coherently integrating temporal dimensions, transition processes, positional typologies, and the inherent non-linearity of collaborative development. The implications of these findings are tremendous, conceptually and practically, for program designers, policy makers, and researchers attempting to understand, diagnose, and drive the growth of CG across a number of sectoral and geographic contexts.

动态协同治理连续体模型:成功与失败因素的理论建构系统回顾
本研究旨在分析协同治理的发展、影响其成败的因素,并提供动态协同治理的概念框架。本研究对文献进行了系统评估,基于2014年至2023年的712篇论文中的45篇,将CG作为解决邪恶问题的关键方面。这项研究发现了三件重要的事情。首先,时间分析表明,除了自适应时代和数字化时代外,关于CG的文献经历了三个不同的阶段:制度化、复杂性和动态化,因此呈现出从静态范式向更具动态和适应性范式的范式转变。第二,主题综合确定了成功的主题,如制度设计、学习和适应、资源和能力,以及失败的主题,其中利益冲突和复杂性被确定为最常见的问题。第三,本研究提出了一种新的理论,即动态CG连续体模型(DCGCM),该模型将CG概念化为一个连续体,通过成熟度的三个维度(结构-制度、关系过程、适应性学习)和两种可见的过渡机制,将CG分为三个阶段(碎片化、过渡化和适应性协作)。DCGCM通过统一和连贯地整合时间维度、过渡过程、位置类型和协同开发的固有非线性,克服了其他CG模型的局限性。这些发现的意义是巨大的,无论是概念上还是实践上,对于项目设计者、政策制定者和研究人员来说,他们试图理解、诊断和推动CG在许多部门和地理背景下的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书