Beyond Green Cover: Links Between Greenspace Morphology, Configuration, and Heat-Related Illness in Arizona

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Geohealth Pub Date : 2026-09-19 DOI:10.1029/2026GH001978
Huaqing Wang, Shujuan Li, Simin Gholami, Joseph Hoover, Mackenzie Waller, Kacey Ernst
{"title":"Beyond Green Cover: Links Between Greenspace Morphology, Configuration, and Heat-Related Illness in Arizona","authors":"Huaqing Wang,&nbsp;Shujuan Li,&nbsp;Simin Gholami,&nbsp;Joseph Hoover,&nbsp;Mackenzie Waller,&nbsp;Kacey Ernst","doi":"10.1029/2026GH001978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Residential greenness has been associated with reduced heat-related illness, yet the specific role of greenspace morphology at the neighborhood scale remains insufficiently understood. This study quantified the relationship between heat-related illness and multiple dimensions of greenspace morphology using an 8-year (2016–2023) unbalanced panel data set comprising 19,021 block-group–year observations across 2,427 census block groups in Arizona, USA. One meter high-resolution National Agricultural Imagery Program aerial imagery was classified to calculate greenspace percentage, number of greenspaces, average size, shape complexity, connectedness, and distantness, at the block group level. We applied conditional spatial autoregressive models with a negative binomial distribution to estimate associations between each morphology metric and yearly heat-related illness counts, adjusting for sociodemographic and geographic covariates. Additional sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of findings to overall greenspace amount, local climatic conditions, and alternative exposure specifications. We found higher greenspace percentage, aggregation, shape complexity, connectedness, and density were consistently associated with lower heat-related illness risk. A one–standard deviation increases in shape complexity corresponded to a 12.4% decrease in expected heat-related illness counts (IRR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.834–0.921). Similarly, increases in greenspace percentage (14.6% decrease; IRR = 0.855, 95% CI: 0.827–0.885), number of greenspace patches (3.7% decrease; IRR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.937–0.990), average size (4.5% decrease; IRR = 0.955, 95% CI: 0.923–0.989), and connectedness (5.5% decrease; IRR = 0.945, 95% CI: 0.918–0.972) were all protective. In contrast, larger inter-greenspace distances were associated with increased heat-related illness risk (6.1% increase; IRR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.033–1.091). These associations were generally robust to additional adjustment for local climatic conditions and overall greenspace area. Our findings highlight the critical importance of multiple dimensions of greenspace morphology in relation to heat-related health risks. These results suggest that heat-reduction planning with greening initiatives should consider not only the amount of greenspace but also its spatial configuration to maximize cooling and result in health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"10 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2026GH001978","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GH001978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential greenness has been associated with reduced heat-related illness, yet the specific role of greenspace morphology at the neighborhood scale remains insufficiently understood. This study quantified the relationship between heat-related illness and multiple dimensions of greenspace morphology using an 8-year (2016–2023) unbalanced panel data set comprising 19,021 block-group–year observations across 2,427 census block groups in Arizona, USA. One meter high-resolution National Agricultural Imagery Program aerial imagery was classified to calculate greenspace percentage, number of greenspaces, average size, shape complexity, connectedness, and distantness, at the block group level. We applied conditional spatial autoregressive models with a negative binomial distribution to estimate associations between each morphology metric and yearly heat-related illness counts, adjusting for sociodemographic and geographic covariates. Additional sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of findings to overall greenspace amount, local climatic conditions, and alternative exposure specifications. We found higher greenspace percentage, aggregation, shape complexity, connectedness, and density were consistently associated with lower heat-related illness risk. A one–standard deviation increases in shape complexity corresponded to a 12.4% decrease in expected heat-related illness counts (IRR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.834–0.921). Similarly, increases in greenspace percentage (14.6% decrease; IRR = 0.855, 95% CI: 0.827–0.885), number of greenspace patches (3.7% decrease; IRR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.937–0.990), average size (4.5% decrease; IRR = 0.955, 95% CI: 0.923–0.989), and connectedness (5.5% decrease; IRR = 0.945, 95% CI: 0.918–0.972) were all protective. In contrast, larger inter-greenspace distances were associated with increased heat-related illness risk (6.1% increase; IRR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.033–1.091). These associations were generally robust to additional adjustment for local climatic conditions and overall greenspace area. Our findings highlight the critical importance of multiple dimensions of greenspace morphology in relation to heat-related health risks. These results suggest that heat-reduction planning with greening initiatives should consider not only the amount of greenspace but also its spatial configuration to maximize cooling and result in health benefits.

超越绿色覆盖:亚利桑那州绿色空间形态、配置和热相关疾病之间的联系
住宅绿化与减少热相关疾病有关,但绿色空间形态在社区尺度上的具体作用仍未得到充分理解。本研究使用8年(2016-2023)非平衡面板数据集,量化了热相关疾病与绿地形态多维度之间的关系,该数据集包括美国亚利桑那州2427个人口普查街区群体的19021个街区群体年观测数据。一米高分辨率的国家农业图像计划航空图像被分类,以计算绿地百分比,绿地数量,平均大小,形状复杂性,连通性和距离,在块组级别。我们应用负二项分布的条件空间自回归模型来估计每种形态度量与年度热相关疾病计数之间的关联,并调整了社会人口统计学和地理协变量。额外的敏感性分析评估了研究结果对总体绿地面积、当地气候条件和替代暴露规范的稳健性。我们发现,较高的绿地百分比、聚集度、形状复杂性、连通性和密度始终与较低的热相关疾病风险相关。形状复杂性的一个标准差增加对应于预期热相关疾病计数减少12.4% (IRR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.834-0.921)。同样,绿地百分比(减少14.6%,IRR = 0.855, 95% CI: 0.827-0.885)、绿地斑块数量(减少3.7%,IRR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.937-0.990)、平均面积(减少4.5%,IRR = 0.955, 95% CI: 0.923-0.989)和连通性(减少5.5%,IRR = 0.945, 95% CI: 0.918-0.972)的增加都具有保护作用。相比之下,较大的绿地间距与热相关疾病风险增加相关(增加6.1%;IRR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.033-1.091)。这些关联对于当地气候条件和整体绿地面积的额外调整通常是稳健的。我们的研究结果强调了与热相关的健康风险相关的绿色空间形态的多个维度的重要性。这些结果表明,具有绿化举措的减热规划不仅要考虑绿色空间的数量,而且要考虑其空间配置,以最大限度地冷却并产生健康效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书