How Are Pupils With Reading Difficulties Taught? A National Survey of School Leaders and Teachers

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Literacy Pub Date : 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1111/lit.70050
Homayra Rahimi, Rosanne Esposito, Miriam McBreen, Dominic Wyse
{"title":"How Are Pupils With Reading Difficulties Taught? A National Survey of School Leaders and Teachers","authors":"Homayra Rahimi,&nbsp;Rosanne Esposito,&nbsp;Miriam McBreen,&nbsp;Dominic Wyse","doi":"10.1111/lit.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The research reported in this paper explored how reading provision was implemented for pupils with reading difficulties in primary schools, including the factors that influenced practitioners' instructional approaches. The findings from a questionnaire survey of educators working in diverse primary schools in England are reported. There was evidence of marked variation in reading provision across schools, alongside a strong predominance of phonics-based approaches in both whole-class reading instruction and targeted interventions. Most practitioners also reported relying primarily on professional judgement and experience when making instructional decisions: Few reported referring to research evidence as the primary basis for their approaches. These findings highlight a disconnect between research evidence showing effective practices for children with reading difficulties and practices in schools. New approaches are needed to ensure a closer match between evidence from high-quality research and optimal practice and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lit.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research reported in this paper explored how reading provision was implemented for pupils with reading difficulties in primary schools, including the factors that influenced practitioners' instructional approaches. The findings from a questionnaire survey of educators working in diverse primary schools in England are reported. There was evidence of marked variation in reading provision across schools, alongside a strong predominance of phonics-based approaches in both whole-class reading instruction and targeted interventions. Most practitioners also reported relying primarily on professional judgement and experience when making instructional decisions: Few reported referring to research evidence as the primary basis for their approaches. These findings highlight a disconnect between research evidence showing effective practices for children with reading difficulties and practices in schools. New approaches are needed to ensure a closer match between evidence from high-quality research and optimal practice and policy.

如何教育有阅读困难的学生?全国学校领导和教师调查
本文的研究探讨了如何为小学有阅读困难的学生提供阅读,包括影响从业者教学方法的因素。本文报道了对英国不同小学教育工作者进行问卷调查的结果。有证据表明,不同学校的阅读教学存在显著差异,在全班阅读教学和有针对性的干预中,基于语音的方法都占主导地位。大多数实践者还报告说,在做出教学决定时主要依靠专业判断和经验:很少有人报告说,参考研究证据作为他们方法的主要基础。这些发现突出表明,研究证据表明,对有阅读困难的儿童进行有效的实践与学校的实践之间存在脱节。需要新的方法来确保高质量研究的证据与最佳实践和政策之间的更紧密匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书