Abdullah Jalal, Emily Jagenburg, Kiran R Nandalur, Sayf Al-Katib
{"title":"Diversity in abdominal radiology: a decade-long review of gender, racial, and ethnic representation among fellows.","authors":"Abdullah Jalal, Emily Jagenburg, Kiran R Nandalur, Sayf Al-Katib","doi":"10.1007/s00261-026-05789-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent analyses have characterized demographic trends in neuroradiology fellowships; however, diversity patterns within abdominal radiology fellowships have not been independently evaluated. This study examines gender and racial/ethnic representation among abdominal radiology fellows over a decade and contextualizes these findings relative to published neuroradiology fellowship data and broader radiology workforce trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publicly available Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Book data were analyzed for abdominal radiology fellows from academic years 2014-2015 through 2023-2024. Self-reported gender and race/ethnicity were extracted. Underrepresented in medicine (URM) status was defined as Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Binomial logistic regression and Cochran-Armitage trend testing were performed to assess temporal trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 468 abdominal radiology fellows were identified across 10 academic years, with 44-54 fellows enrolled annually. Overall, 29.9% were female and 6.6% met URM criteria. Female representation ranged from 17.8% to 38.8% without a statistically significant temporal trend (OR per year 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.07; p = 0.92). URM representation ranged from 2.2% to 12.2% without significant change over time (OR per year 1.06; 95% CI 0.93-1.21; p = 0.36). Compared with published neuroradiology fellowship data, abdominal radiology demonstrated modestly higher female representation but similarly low URM representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominal radiology fellowships demonstrate persistent gender and racial/ethnic disparities over a decade. These findings underscore the need for targeted, sustained diversity interventions across the diagnostic radiology training pipeline, particularly at earlier stages where efforts may take years to manifest at the fellowship level.</p>","PeriodicalId":520541,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal radiology (New York)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal radiology (New York)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05789-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Recent analyses have characterized demographic trends in neuroradiology fellowships; however, diversity patterns within abdominal radiology fellowships have not been independently evaluated. This study examines gender and racial/ethnic representation among abdominal radiology fellows over a decade and contextualizes these findings relative to published neuroradiology fellowship data and broader radiology workforce trends.
Methods: Publicly available Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Book data were analyzed for abdominal radiology fellows from academic years 2014-2015 through 2023-2024. Self-reported gender and race/ethnicity were extracted. Underrepresented in medicine (URM) status was defined as Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Binomial logistic regression and Cochran-Armitage trend testing were performed to assess temporal trends.
Results: A total of 468 abdominal radiology fellows were identified across 10 academic years, with 44-54 fellows enrolled annually. Overall, 29.9% were female and 6.6% met URM criteria. Female representation ranged from 17.8% to 38.8% without a statistically significant temporal trend (OR per year 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.07; p = 0.92). URM representation ranged from 2.2% to 12.2% without significant change over time (OR per year 1.06; 95% CI 0.93-1.21; p = 0.36). Compared with published neuroradiology fellowship data, abdominal radiology demonstrated modestly higher female representation but similarly low URM representation.
Conclusion: Abdominal radiology fellowships demonstrate persistent gender and racial/ethnic disparities over a decade. These findings underscore the need for targeted, sustained diversity interventions across the diagnostic radiology training pipeline, particularly at earlier stages where efforts may take years to manifest at the fellowship level.
目的:最近的分析揭示了神经放射学奖学金的人口趋势;然而,腹部放射学研究人员的多样性模式尚未得到独立评估。本研究调查了十多年来腹部放射学研究员的性别和种族/民族代表性,并将这些发现与已发表的神经放射学研究数据和更广泛的放射学劳动力趋势联系起来。方法:对2014-2015学年至2023-2024学年腹部放射学研究员的公开资料进行分析。提取自我报告的性别和种族/民族。医学中代表性不足(URM)的定义为西班牙裔/拉丁裔、黑人/非裔美国人、美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民。采用二项逻辑回归和Cochran-Armitage趋势检验来评估时间趋势。结果:在10个学年中,共确定了468名腹部放射学研究员,每年招募44-54名研究员。总体而言,29.9%为女性,6.6%符合URM标准。女性占比从17.8%到38.8%不等,没有统计学上显著的时间趋势(OR每年1.00;95% CI 0.94-1.07; p = 0.92)。URM的代表性从2.2%到12.2%不等,没有随时间的显著变化(OR每年1.06;95% CI 0.93-1.21; p = 0.36)。与已发表的神经放射学研究数据相比,腹部放射学显示女性比例略高,但URM比例同样较低。结论:十年来,腹部放射学研究显示出持续的性别和种族/民族差异。这些发现强调了在诊断放射学培训管道中进行有针对性的、持续的多样性干预的必要性,特别是在早期阶段,这些努力可能需要数年才能在奖学金水平上体现出来。