Maria Lourdes Del Río Solá, Ana Pérez Jiménez, Sandra Pérez Fernández
{"title":"Exercise-based interventions for prevention and management of deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review.","authors":"Maria Lourdes Del Río Solá, Ana Pérez Jiménez, Sandra Pérez Fernández","doi":"10.1177/02683555261490372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of exercise-related interventions for the prevention and management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 31 December 2024 using terms related to exercise, physical activity, DVT, and venous thromboembolism. Reference lists of eligible studies and relevant systematic reviews were also screened. English- and Spanish-language studies were considered.Review methods11 primary studies, reported in 12 publications, met the eligibility criteria: seven evaluated preventive strategies or venous-haemodynamic outcomes in participants without established DVT, three evaluated mobilisation or supervised exercise following objectively confirmed acute DVT, and one evaluated supervised exercise in established post-thrombotic syndrome. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, interventions, comparators, outcomes, safety data, and results. Risk of bias was assessed using design-specific tools, and findings were synthesized narratively by clinical setting.Data synthesisExercise interventions produced favourable changes in surrogate lower-limb venous-haemodynamic measures, while regular sports participation was associated with lower odds of a first venous thrombosis. In acute DVT, mobilisation alongside anticoagulation and compression did not appear to increase thromboembolic complications. Symptomatic improvements could not be separated from compression, and supervised exercise did not improve recanalisation. In established post-thrombotic syndrome, supervised exercise improved disease-specific quality of life, although the reduction in Villalta score was not statistically significant. No universal start time was established. Evidence was limited by small samples, heterogeneity, and methodological concerns.ConclusionsExercise may favourably modify surrogate venous haemodynamics. In selected patients with acute DVT receiving anticoagulation and compression, mobilisation did not appear to increase thromboembolic complications, although its independent effects and optimal timing remain uncertain. Supervised exercise may improve disease-specific quality of life in established post-thrombotic syndrome. Larger randomized trials using standardized interventions and clinically relevant outcomes are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555261490372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261490372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of exercise-related interventions for the prevention and management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 31 December 2024 using terms related to exercise, physical activity, DVT, and venous thromboembolism. Reference lists of eligible studies and relevant systematic reviews were also screened. English- and Spanish-language studies were considered.Review methods11 primary studies, reported in 12 publications, met the eligibility criteria: seven evaluated preventive strategies or venous-haemodynamic outcomes in participants without established DVT, three evaluated mobilisation or supervised exercise following objectively confirmed acute DVT, and one evaluated supervised exercise in established post-thrombotic syndrome. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, interventions, comparators, outcomes, safety data, and results. Risk of bias was assessed using design-specific tools, and findings were synthesized narratively by clinical setting.Data synthesisExercise interventions produced favourable changes in surrogate lower-limb venous-haemodynamic measures, while regular sports participation was associated with lower odds of a first venous thrombosis. In acute DVT, mobilisation alongside anticoagulation and compression did not appear to increase thromboembolic complications. Symptomatic improvements could not be separated from compression, and supervised exercise did not improve recanalisation. In established post-thrombotic syndrome, supervised exercise improved disease-specific quality of life, although the reduction in Villalta score was not statistically significant. No universal start time was established. Evidence was limited by small samples, heterogeneity, and methodological concerns.ConclusionsExercise may favourably modify surrogate venous haemodynamics. In selected patients with acute DVT receiving anticoagulation and compression, mobilisation did not appear to increase thromboembolic complications, although its independent effects and optimal timing remain uncertain. Supervised exercise may improve disease-specific quality of life in established post-thrombotic syndrome. Larger randomized trials using standardized interventions and clinically relevant outcomes are required.
目的评价运动相关干预措施预防和治疗深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的有效性和安全性。数据来源:pubmed、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar从成立到2024年12月31日,使用与运动、身体活动、DVT和静脉血栓栓塞相关的术语进行搜索。还筛选了符合条件的研究和相关系统评价的参考文献清单。考虑进行英语和西班牙语研究。综述方法:12篇出版物报道的11项初步研究符合入选标准:7项评估了未确诊深静脉血栓患者的预防策略或静脉血流动力学结果,3项评估了客观确诊急性深静脉血栓患者的活动或监督运动,1项评估了确诊血栓后综合征患者的监督运动。两位审稿人独立提取研究特征、干预措施、比较物、结局、安全性数据和结果。使用设计特异性工具评估偏倚风险,并根据临床环境对结果进行综合叙述。运动干预在替代下肢静脉血流动力学测量中产生了有利的变化,而定期参加运动与首次静脉血栓形成的几率较低相关。在急性DVT中,动员与抗凝和压迫并不会增加血栓栓塞并发症。症状的改善不能与压迫分离,并且有监督的运动不能改善再通。在确定的血栓形成后综合征中,监督运动改善了疾病特异性生活质量,尽管Villalta评分的降低没有统计学意义。没有建立统一的开始时间。证据受到小样本、异质性和方法学问题的限制。结论运动可改善代静脉血流动力学。在接受抗凝和压迫治疗的急性DVT患者中,动员似乎没有增加血栓栓塞并发症,尽管其独立作用和最佳时机仍不确定。有监督的运动可以改善已确定的血栓形成后综合征的疾病特异性生活质量。需要使用标准化干预措施和临床相关结果的更大规模的随机试验。