Predictors of Optimal Uptake of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Pregnancy (IPTp3+) in Nigeria: Survey-Weighted Regression and Exploratory Machine-Learning Analysis of the 2021 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey.

Happiness Opeyemi Agboola, Adewale Jamiu Lasisi, Olufisayo Elugbadebo, Salim Khan, Olatunde Aremu
{"title":"Predictors of Optimal Uptake of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Pregnancy (IPTp3+) in Nigeria: Survey-Weighted Regression and Exploratory Machine-Learning Analysis of the 2021 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey.","authors":"Happiness Opeyemi Agboola, Adewale Jamiu Lasisi, Olufisayo Elugbadebo, Salim Khan, Olatunde Aremu","doi":"10.71480/nmj.v67i5.1537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria in pregnancy remains a public health challenge in Nigeria despite the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). Uptake of the WHO-recommended minimum of three doses (IPTp3+) remains below national targets. This study examined factors associated with optimal uptake of IPTp and explored machine-learning-based prediction.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We analysed 2021 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey data for 3,103 women aged 15-49 years with a live birth, guided by Andersen's Behavioural Model. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted in R. Descriptive summaries were unweighted, whereas the primary regression incorporated sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units. Following a survey-adjusted nonlinearity test, ANC visits were categorised as 0-3, 4-7, and ≥8. Random Forest and XGBoost were fitted in Python as unweighted exploratory models, with calibration, permutation importance, and SHAP assessed on held-out data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 52.4% of women in the unweighted analytic sample reported IPTp3+ uptake. The association with ANC was nonlinear (F(2,84) = 18.12; p < 0.001). Compared with 0-3 visits, adjusted odds ratios were 2.10 (95% CI: 1.64-2.68) for 4-7 visits and 2.05 (95% CI: 1.49-2.83) for ≥8 visits; both p < 0.001. Geopolitical zone was associated with uptake. XGBoost and Random Forest showed modest discrimination (ROC-AUC: 0.661 and 0.640) and Brier scores of 0.225 and 0.228.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only about half of women achieved optimal IPTp uptake. ANC attendance was strongly associated with IPTp3+ uptake, while geographic disparities persisted after adjustment. The exploratory machine-learning models showed modest predictive performance. Strengthening ANC access and improving IPTp delivery remain important priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"67 5","pages":"1801-1818"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71480/nmj.v67i5.1537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria in pregnancy remains a public health challenge in Nigeria despite the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). Uptake of the WHO-recommended minimum of three doses (IPTp3+) remains below national targets. This study examined factors associated with optimal uptake of IPTp and explored machine-learning-based prediction.

Methodology: We analysed 2021 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey data for 3,103 women aged 15-49 years with a live birth, guided by Andersen's Behavioural Model. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted in R. Descriptive summaries were unweighted, whereas the primary regression incorporated sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling units. Following a survey-adjusted nonlinearity test, ANC visits were categorised as 0-3, 4-7, and ≥8. Random Forest and XGBoost were fitted in Python as unweighted exploratory models, with calibration, permutation importance, and SHAP assessed on held-out data.

Results: Overall, 52.4% of women in the unweighted analytic sample reported IPTp3+ uptake. The association with ANC was nonlinear (F(2,84) = 18.12; p < 0.001). Compared with 0-3 visits, adjusted odds ratios were 2.10 (95% CI: 1.64-2.68) for 4-7 visits and 2.05 (95% CI: 1.49-2.83) for ≥8 visits; both p < 0.001. Geopolitical zone was associated with uptake. XGBoost and Random Forest showed modest discrimination (ROC-AUC: 0.661 and 0.640) and Brier scores of 0.225 and 0.228.

Conclusion: Only about half of women achieved optimal IPTp uptake. ANC attendance was strongly associated with IPTp3+ uptake, while geographic disparities persisted after adjustment. The exploratory machine-learning models showed modest predictive performance. Strengthening ANC access and improving IPTp delivery remain important priorities.

尼日利亚妊娠期间歇性预防治疗(IPTp3+)最佳吸收的预测因素:2021年尼日利亚疟疾指标调查的调查加权回归和探索性机器学习分析
背景:尽管磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(IPTp-SP)间歇性预防治疗有效,但在尼日利亚,妊娠期疟疾仍然是一项公共卫生挑战。世卫组织推荐的至少三剂(IPTp3+)的吸收量仍低于国家目标。本研究考察了与最佳IPTp摄取相关的因素,并探索了基于机器学习的预测。方法:我们在安徒生行为模型的指导下,分析了2021年尼日利亚疟疾指标调查中3103名15-49岁活产妇女的数据。描述性和回归分析在r中进行,描述性总结是不加权的,而初级回归包括抽样权重、地层和初级抽样单位。根据调查调整的非线性检验,ANC就诊分为0- 3,4 -7和≥8。随机森林和XGBoost在Python中拟合为非加权探索性模型,对持有数据进行校准,排列重要性和SHAP评估。结果:总体而言,在未加权分析样本中,52.4%的女性报告IPTp3+摄取。与ANC呈非线性关系(F(2,84) = 18.12;P < 0.001)。与0-3次就诊相比,4-7次就诊的校正优势比为2.10 (95% CI: 1.64-2.68),≥8次就诊的校正优势比为2.05 (95% CI: 1.49-2.83);p均< 0.001。地缘政治区域与摄取有关。XGBoost和Random Forest的ROC-AUC分别为0.661和0.640,Brier得分分别为0.225和0.228。结论:只有大约一半的妇女达到最佳的IPTp摄取。ANC出席率与IPTp3+摄取密切相关,而调整后的地理差异仍然存在。探索性机器学习模型显示出适度的预测性能。加强非洲国民保健服务的获取和改善IPTp的实施仍然是重要的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书