Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Adverse Drug Reactions Among Elderly Psychiatric Outpatients Receiving Antipsychotics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sumit Kumar Mahato, T Y Sree Sudha, Kusum Kumari, Jameema Liza Thankachan, V Veena, Ayoshi Mondal
{"title":"Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Adverse Drug Reactions Among Elderly Psychiatric Outpatients Receiving Antipsychotics: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Sumit Kumar Mahato, T Y Sree Sudha, Kusum Kumari, Jameema Liza Thankachan, V Veena, Ayoshi Mondal","doi":"10.71480/nmj.v67i5.1361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with psychiatric illness often take long-term antipsychotics along with medicines for chronic diseases, increasing the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Indian outpatient data are limited. The main objective of this study was to describe pDDIs involving antipsychotics and assess associated ADRs in elderly psychiatric outpatients (frequency, mechanism, severity).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The present study was a cross-sectional study, in which 105 elderly psychiatric outpatients who were on stable antipsychotics plus chronic disease therapy were enrolled. Prescriptions were screened for pDDIs using Epocrates and Medscape and classified by mechanism (pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, or mixed) and severity. ADRs were documented using ICSR, with causality assessed by the Naranjo algorithm and severity by the Hartwig-Siegel scale. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institute Ethical Committee. Descriptive and bivariate analyses (chi-square, Welch's t-test) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 69.0 ± 4.7 years; 54.3% were male, and patients used a mean of 2.18 medications. Depressive (27.6%) and anxiety disorders (25.7%) were most common; hypertension (29.5%) and diabetes (18.1%) were leading comorbidities. Ninety-nine drug pairs were evaluated, predominantly pharmacodynamic (72.7%). Most were rated \"no interaction\" (63.6-70.7%), while 27.3% required \"monitor closely.\" ADRs occurred in 52.4% (n=55), mainly mild (41.8%) or moderate (47.3%); 10.9% were severe. ADRs were more frequent in older patients (mean difference 1.96 years; p=0.034) and males (OR 3.65; p=0.0027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>pDDIs are common in elderly psychiatric outpatients and often warrant close monitoring to reduce ADRs. Routine screening and multidisciplinary medication review may improve safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"67 5","pages":"1836-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71480/nmj.v67i5.1361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults with psychiatric illness often take long-term antipsychotics along with medicines for chronic diseases, increasing the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Indian outpatient data are limited. The main objective of this study was to describe pDDIs involving antipsychotics and assess associated ADRs in elderly psychiatric outpatients (frequency, mechanism, severity).

Methodology: The present study was a cross-sectional study, in which 105 elderly psychiatric outpatients who were on stable antipsychotics plus chronic disease therapy were enrolled. Prescriptions were screened for pDDIs using Epocrates and Medscape and classified by mechanism (pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, or mixed) and severity. ADRs were documented using ICSR, with causality assessed by the Naranjo algorithm and severity by the Hartwig-Siegel scale. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institute Ethical Committee. Descriptive and bivariate analyses (chi-square, Welch's t-test) were performed.

Results: Mean age was 69.0 ± 4.7 years; 54.3% were male, and patients used a mean of 2.18 medications. Depressive (27.6%) and anxiety disorders (25.7%) were most common; hypertension (29.5%) and diabetes (18.1%) were leading comorbidities. Ninety-nine drug pairs were evaluated, predominantly pharmacodynamic (72.7%). Most were rated "no interaction" (63.6-70.7%), while 27.3% required "monitor closely." ADRs occurred in 52.4% (n=55), mainly mild (41.8%) or moderate (47.3%); 10.9% were severe. ADRs were more frequent in older patients (mean difference 1.96 years; p=0.034) and males (OR 3.65; p=0.0027).

Conclusion: pDDIs are common in elderly psychiatric outpatients and often warrant close monitoring to reduce ADRs. Routine screening and multidisciplinary medication review may improve safety.

在接受抗精神病药物的老年精神科门诊患者中潜在的药物相互作用和药物不良反应:一项横断面研究。
背景:患有精神疾病的老年人经常长期服用抗精神病药物和慢性疾病药物,增加了潜在的药物-药物相互作用(pddi)和药物不良反应(adr)的风险。印度的门诊数据有限。本研究的主要目的是描述涉及抗精神病药物的pddi,并评估老年精神科门诊患者的相关adr(频率、机制、严重程度)。方法:本研究为横断面研究,纳入105例接受稳定抗精神病药物加慢性疾病治疗的老年精神科门诊患者。使用Epocrates和Medscape筛选处方,并根据机制(药效学、药代动力学或混合)和严重程度进行分类。使用ICSR记录不良反应,用Naranjo算法评估因果关系,用Hartwig-Siegel量表评估严重程度。获得了研究所伦理委员会的伦理批准。进行了描述性和双变量分析(卡方检验、韦尔奇t检验)。结果:平均年龄69.0±4.7岁;54.3%为男性,患者平均使用2.18种药物。抑郁症(27.6%)和焦虑症(25.7%)最为常见;高血压(29.5%)和糖尿病(18.1%)是主要的合并症。共评价了99对药物,主要是药效学(72.7%)。大多数被评为“无互动”(63.6-70.7%),而27.3%被评为“密切监测”。不良反应发生率为52.4% (n=55),以轻度(41.8%)和中度(47.3%)为主;10.9%为重度。不良反应在老年人(平均差1.96年,p=0.034)和男性(OR 3.65, p=0.0027)中更为常见。结论:pddi在老年精神科门诊患者中很常见,经常需要密切监测以减少不良反应。常规筛查和多学科用药审查可提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书