The diagnostic value of additional ECG-gated CT for the diagnosis of aortic valve endocarditis with aortic root abscesses and pseudoaneurysms: A comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings.

IF 1.5
Thea Stybe, Lauge Østergaard, Amna Alhakak, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed, Jørgen Tobias Kühl, Oskar Ward, Lars Køber, Sune Damgaard, Morten Smerup, Jesper James Linde, Emil Fosbøl
{"title":"The diagnostic value of additional ECG-gated CT for the diagnosis of aortic valve endocarditis with aortic root abscesses and pseudoaneurysms: A comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings.","authors":"Thea Stybe, Lauge Østergaard, Amna Alhakak, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed, Jørgen Tobias Kühl, Oskar Ward, Lars Køber, Sune Damgaard, Morten Smerup, Jesper James Linde, Emil Fosbøl","doi":"10.1007/s10554-026-03829-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting perivalvar infection including aortic root abscesses and pseudoaneurysms in infective endocarditis remains challenging, and standard transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) often leaves diagnostic uncertainty. This study examines whether adding cardiac computed tomography (CCT) improves detection of such complications. 32 endocarditis cases who underwent TEE, CCT, and cardiac surgery were retrospectively analysed. Three expert cardiologists independently reviewed anonymised TEEs followed by corresponding CCTs. Diagnostic performance for detecting aortic root abscesses and pseudoaneurysms was assessed against surgical findings as gold standard. ROC curves and AUC compared the two modalities. 13/32 cases had abscess/pseudoaneurysms (8 abscesses, 8 pseudoaneurysms). Accuracy increased from 88% with TEE to 91% with TEE + CCT. Sensitivity improved from 85% to 100% while specificity decreased from 89% to 84%. CCT increased NPV to 100% and diagnostic confidence in 91% of cases. AUC tended higher for TEE + CCT than TEE alone (0.92 vs. 0.87, p = 0.47). For pseudoaneurysms, CCT increased AUC (TEE + CCT=0.98 vs. TEE = 0.67, p = 0.001). Adding CCT to TEE improved the detection and exclusion of abscess/pseudoaneurysms, although results should be interpreted cautiously due to the sample size. The combination increased sensitivity at the expense of a small reduction in specificity, achieved a NPV of 100% and increased diagnostic confidence in physicians, supporting CCT as complementary imaging. The greatest benefit was for pseudoaneurysms, where TEE + CCT identified all and significantly improved AUC, whereas the overall improvement was less pronounced when abscesses were included. Given the rarity of these complications and the limited sample size, larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-026-03829-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detecting perivalvar infection including aortic root abscesses and pseudoaneurysms in infective endocarditis remains challenging, and standard transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) often leaves diagnostic uncertainty. This study examines whether adding cardiac computed tomography (CCT) improves detection of such complications. 32 endocarditis cases who underwent TEE, CCT, and cardiac surgery were retrospectively analysed. Three expert cardiologists independently reviewed anonymised TEEs followed by corresponding CCTs. Diagnostic performance for detecting aortic root abscesses and pseudoaneurysms was assessed against surgical findings as gold standard. ROC curves and AUC compared the two modalities. 13/32 cases had abscess/pseudoaneurysms (8 abscesses, 8 pseudoaneurysms). Accuracy increased from 88% with TEE to 91% with TEE + CCT. Sensitivity improved from 85% to 100% while specificity decreased from 89% to 84%. CCT increased NPV to 100% and diagnostic confidence in 91% of cases. AUC tended higher for TEE + CCT than TEE alone (0.92 vs. 0.87, p = 0.47). For pseudoaneurysms, CCT increased AUC (TEE + CCT=0.98 vs. TEE = 0.67, p = 0.001). Adding CCT to TEE improved the detection and exclusion of abscess/pseudoaneurysms, although results should be interpreted cautiously due to the sample size. The combination increased sensitivity at the expense of a small reduction in specificity, achieved a NPV of 100% and increased diagnostic confidence in physicians, supporting CCT as complementary imaging. The greatest benefit was for pseudoaneurysms, where TEE + CCT identified all and significantly improved AUC, whereas the overall improvement was less pronounced when abscesses were included. Given the rarity of these complications and the limited sample size, larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

附加ecg门控CT对主动脉瓣心内膜炎合并主动脉根部脓肿和假性动脉瘤的诊断价值:与经食管超声心动图和术中表现的比较。
在感染性心内膜炎中检测瓣周感染(包括主动脉根脓肿和假性动脉瘤)仍然具有挑战性,标准经食管超声心动图(TEE)往往留下诊断的不确定性。本研究探讨增加心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)是否能改善此类并发症的检测。回顾性分析32例接受TEE、CCT和心脏手术的心内膜炎患者。三位心脏病专家独立审查了匿名tee和相应的cct。检测主动脉根部脓肿和假性动脉瘤的诊断性能以手术结果为金标准进行评估。两种模式的ROC曲线和AUC比较。脓肿/假性动脉瘤13/32例(脓肿8例,假性动脉瘤8例)。准确度从TEE组的88%提高到TEE + CCT组的91%。灵敏度从85%提高到100%,而特异性从89%下降到84%。CCT将NPV提高到100%,诊断置信度为91%。TEE + CCT的AUC高于单独TEE (0.92 vs. 0.87, p = 0.47)。假性动脉瘤,CCT增加AUC (TEE + CCT=0.98 vs. TEE = 0.67, p = 0.001)。在TEE中加入CCT提高了对脓肿/假性动脉瘤的发现和排除,但由于样本量的原因,结果应谨慎解释。该组合以降低特异性为代价提高了灵敏度,实现了100%的NPV,提高了医生的诊断信心,支持CCT作为补充成像。最大的益处是假性动脉瘤,TEE + CCT可以识别所有并显著改善AUC,而当脓肿包括在内时,总体改善不太明显。鉴于这些并发症的罕见性和有限的样本量,有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书