Oral Medication Swallowing in Dysphagia: Prevalence of Penetration, Aspiration, Residue, and Epiglottic Morphology Impact-A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.3
Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20260050
Kazuya Hara, Kenjiro Kunieda, Keishi Okamoto, Tomohisa Ohno, Takashi Shigematsu, Ichiro Fujishima
{"title":"Oral Medication Swallowing in Dysphagia: Prevalence of Penetration, Aspiration, Residue, and Epiglottic Morphology Impact-A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Kazuya Hara, Kenjiro Kunieda, Keishi Okamoto, Tomohisa Ohno, Takashi Shigematsu, Ichiro Fujishima","doi":"10.2490/prm.20260050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pill dysphagia, defined as difficulty swallowing oral medications, is associated with liquid penetration, aspiration, and residue. However, data on these outcomes based on videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of liquid penetration-aspiration and tablet residue using VFSS and identify the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 93 patients with dysphagia who exhibited a Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score of 1 while drinking moderately thickened liquids. The patients were evaluated with small, medium, or both tablet sizes based on clinical judgment. Primary endpoints were liquid penetration-aspiration (PAS ≥2) and tablet residue. We analyzed liquid penetration-aspiration risk factors using multivariable logistic regression. Because of sample imbalance for residue, we examined the association with epiglottic morphology using univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liquid penetration-aspiration and tablet residue occurred in 33.3% and 34.4% of the patients, respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis identified that unthickened liquid [odds ratio (OR) = 4.40] and small tablet size (OR = 3.19) were significantly associated with liquid penetration-aspiration. In the univariate analysis, intermediate epiglottic morphology was significantly associated with vallecular residue.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even when swallowing liquids is safe, patients may experience penetration, aspiration, or residue during oral medication swallowing. Unthickened liquids were independently associated with liquid penetration-aspiration. The association between small tablets and aspiration likely reflects confounding by indication in patients requiring a more cautious swallowing approach. Although not an independent risk factor for overall residue, intermediate epiglottic morphology may specifically contribute to vallecular tablet residue.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"20260050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20260050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pill dysphagia, defined as difficulty swallowing oral medications, is associated with liquid penetration, aspiration, and residue. However, data on these outcomes based on videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of liquid penetration-aspiration and tablet residue using VFSS and identify the associated risk factors.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 93 patients with dysphagia who exhibited a Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score of 1 while drinking moderately thickened liquids. The patients were evaluated with small, medium, or both tablet sizes based on clinical judgment. Primary endpoints were liquid penetration-aspiration (PAS ≥2) and tablet residue. We analyzed liquid penetration-aspiration risk factors using multivariable logistic regression. Because of sample imbalance for residue, we examined the association with epiglottic morphology using univariate analysis.

Results: Liquid penetration-aspiration and tablet residue occurred in 33.3% and 34.4% of the patients, respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis identified that unthickened liquid [odds ratio (OR) = 4.40] and small tablet size (OR = 3.19) were significantly associated with liquid penetration-aspiration. In the univariate analysis, intermediate epiglottic morphology was significantly associated with vallecular residue.

Conclusions: Even when swallowing liquids is safe, patients may experience penetration, aspiration, or residue during oral medication swallowing. Unthickened liquids were independently associated with liquid penetration-aspiration. The association between small tablets and aspiration likely reflects confounding by indication in patients requiring a more cautious swallowing approach. Although not an independent risk factor for overall residue, intermediate epiglottic morphology may specifically contribute to vallecular tablet residue.

吞咽困难患者口服药物吞咽:渗透、误吸、残留和会厌形态影响的发生率-一项回顾性研究。
目的:药片吞咽困难,定义为口服药物吞咽困难,与液体渗透、误吸和残留有关。然而,基于视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)的这些结果的数据是有限的。本研究旨在利用VFSS测定药液渗吸和片剂残留的流行情况,并确定相关的危险因素。方法:本回顾性研究分析了93例吞咽困难患者,这些患者在饮用中等浓度液体时表现为渗透-吸入量表(PAS)评分为1分。根据临床判断,对患者进行小、中或两种片剂大小的评估。主要终点为液体渗透吸吸(PAS≥2)和片剂残留。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析液体渗透-吸入危险因素。由于残留的样本不平衡,我们使用单变量分析检查了与会厌形态的关联。结果:液体渗吸和片剂残留发生率分别为33.3%和34.4%。多变量logistic分析发现,未加厚的液体[比值比(OR) = 4.40]和小片剂(OR = 3.19)与液体渗透吸入显著相关。在单变量分析中,中间会厌形态与瓣膜残留显著相关。结论:即使吞咽液体是安全的,患者在口服药物吞咽过程中也可能出现渗透、误吸或残留。未增稠的液体与液体渗透吸吸独立相关。小片剂和误吸之间的联系可能反映了需要更谨慎的吞咽方法的患者的适应症。虽然不是整体残留的独立危险因素,但中间会阴形态可能特别有助于瓣膜剂残留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书