Effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy in partial-thickness and full-thickness burns: a systematic review.

IF 1.3
Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2026-09-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb415426
Vanessa Cindy Oliveira Neres Lima de Souza, Ana Caroliny da Silva, Ruy de Souza Lino Junior, Thauana Garcia da Silveira
{"title":"Effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy in partial-thickness and full-thickness burns: a systematic review.","authors":"Vanessa Cindy Oliveira Neres Lima de Souza, Ana Caroliny da Silva, Ruy de Souza Lino Junior, Thauana Garcia da Silveira","doi":"10.1590/acb415426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in healing partial- and full-thickness burns in humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included, involving 466 patients with partial- and full-thickness burns. The sample comprised five randomized controlled trials, two retrospective observational studies, and one prospective cohort study. NPWT was applied in continuous or intermittent modes, with pressures ranging from 40 to 125 mmHg. The most frequently assessed outcome was re-epithelialization time, with NPWT superiority reported in three studies. NPWT was also associated with greater reduction in wound area and bacterial load. Additional outcomes included pain, graft integration, and scar quality, as well as logistical advantages such as reduced dressing change frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPWT provides benefits in burn treatment, including reduction of wound area, bacterial count, and re-epithelialization time, along with effectiveness in graft integration and healing quality. Despite limitations, such as application difficulties and prolonged treatment in pediatric patients, NPWT stands out for decreasing dressing changes, improving care logistics and psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"41 ","pages":"e415426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13568592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb415426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in healing partial- and full-thickness burns in humans.

Methods: This systematic review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA checklist.

Results: Eight studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included, involving 466 patients with partial- and full-thickness burns. The sample comprised five randomized controlled trials, two retrospective observational studies, and one prospective cohort study. NPWT was applied in continuous or intermittent modes, with pressures ranging from 40 to 125 mmHg. The most frequently assessed outcome was re-epithelialization time, with NPWT superiority reported in three studies. NPWT was also associated with greater reduction in wound area and bacterial load. Additional outcomes included pain, graft integration, and scar quality, as well as logistical advantages such as reduced dressing change frequency.

Conclusion: NPWT provides benefits in burn treatment, including reduction of wound area, bacterial count, and re-epithelialization time, along with effectiveness in graft integration and healing quality. Despite limitations, such as application difficulties and prolonged treatment in pediatric patients, NPWT stands out for decreasing dressing changes, improving care logistics and psychological well-being.

负压创面治疗部分和全层烧伤的有效性:系统综述。
目的:评价负压创面治疗(NPWT)在人体部分和全层烧伤中的疗效。方法:本系统评价遵循Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册和PRISMA检查表。结果:纳入2014年至2024年间发表的8项研究,涉及466例部分和全层烧伤患者。样本包括5项随机对照试验、2项回顾性观察性研究和1项前瞻性队列研究。NPWT以连续或间歇模式应用,压力范围为40 ~ 125 mmHg。最常见的评估结果是再上皮化时间,有三项研究报告了NPWT的优势。NPWT还与伤口面积和细菌负荷的更大减少有关。其他结果包括疼痛、移植物整合和疤痕质量,以及减少换药频率等后勤优势。结论:NPWT在烧伤治疗中具有一定的优势,包括减少创面面积、细菌数量和再上皮化时间,以及移植物整合和愈合质量的有效性。尽管存在应用困难和延长儿科患者治疗时间等局限性,但NPWT在减少换药、改善护理后勤和心理健康方面脱颖而出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书