Utilization of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics and Clozapine in Coordinated Specialty Care: Data From EPINET.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
John M Kane, Nina R Schooler, Patricia Marcy, C Hendricks Brown, Delbert G Robinson
{"title":"Utilization of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics and Clozapine in Coordinated Specialty Care: Data From EPINET.","authors":"John M Kane, Nina R Schooler, Patricia Marcy, C Hendricks Brown, Delbert G Robinson","doi":"10.4088/JCP.26m16461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We utilized the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) platform to examine variability in utilization rates of 2 evidence-based pharmacologic treatments, long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of antipsychotics and clozapine.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Data come from 8 EPINET clinic consortia, called \"hubs,\" comprising a total of 113 clinics delivering coordinated specialty care (CSC). Hub rates of LAI and clozapine use were calculated based upon the number of patients who were prescribed LAIs or clozapine at any point in a patient's treatment during EPINET participation. Potential effects of demographic differences, including biological sex, race, and ethnicity, across hubs and sites on utilization were examined.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Medication data, collected from September 2019 to June 2024, were available from 16,847 records with 5,324 participants. At the level of hubs, the proportion of patients receiving LAIs ranged from 5.0% to 37.5% and for clozapine 1.7% to 9.0%, and, at the clinic level, the proportion receiving LAIs ranged from 0.024 to 0.60 and for clozapine 0.005 to 0.33. We found very large standard deviations in both hub (0.61) and site (0.50) differences for LAIs, which remained large after adjustments for sex, ethnicity, and race. For clozapine prescribing, site differences were extremely large (0.92), while hub differences (0.37) were nonsignificant.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Pharmacological treatment practices regarding LAIs and clozapine are highly variable in US-based CSC programs. Higher adoption and patient reach through implementation strategies of these evidence-based practices might decrease the all-too-frequent occurrences of persistent positive symptoms, psychotic relapse, and hospitalization in early phase psychotic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.26m16461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We utilized the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) platform to examine variability in utilization rates of 2 evidence-based pharmacologic treatments, long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of antipsychotics and clozapine.

Methods: Data come from 8 EPINET clinic consortia, called "hubs," comprising a total of 113 clinics delivering coordinated specialty care (CSC). Hub rates of LAI and clozapine use were calculated based upon the number of patients who were prescribed LAIs or clozapine at any point in a patient's treatment during EPINET participation. Potential effects of demographic differences, including biological sex, race, and ethnicity, across hubs and sites on utilization were examined.

Results: Medication data, collected from September 2019 to June 2024, were available from 16,847 records with 5,324 participants. At the level of hubs, the proportion of patients receiving LAIs ranged from 5.0% to 37.5% and for clozapine 1.7% to 9.0%, and, at the clinic level, the proportion receiving LAIs ranged from 0.024 to 0.60 and for clozapine 0.005 to 0.33. We found very large standard deviations in both hub (0.61) and site (0.50) differences for LAIs, which remained large after adjustments for sex, ethnicity, and race. For clozapine prescribing, site differences were extremely large (0.92), while hub differences (0.37) were nonsignificant.

Conclusions: Pharmacological treatment practices regarding LAIs and clozapine are highly variable in US-based CSC programs. Higher adoption and patient reach through implementation strategies of these evidence-based practices might decrease the all-too-frequent occurrences of persistent positive symptoms, psychotic relapse, and hospitalization in early phase psychotic disorders.

长效注射抗精神病药物和氯氮平在协调专科护理中的应用:来自EPINET的数据。
目的:利用早期精神病干预网络(EPINET)平台,研究抗精神病药物长效注射制剂和氯氮平两种循证药物治疗方法使用率的差异。方法:数据来自8个EPINET诊所联盟,称为“中心”,由113个提供协调专科护理(CSC)的诊所组成。LAI和氯氮平使用的中心率是根据参与EPINET治疗期间任何时间点服用LAI或氯氮平的患者数量来计算的。研究了人口统计学差异(包括生物性别、种族和民族)对中心和站点的利用的潜在影响。结果:2019年9月至2024年6月收集的药物数据来自16,847份记录,涉及5,324名参与者。在中心水平上,接受LAIs的患者比例为5.0% ~ 37.5%,氯氮平为1.7% ~ 9.0%;在临床水平上,接受LAIs的比例为0.024 ~ 0.60,氯氮平为0.005 ~ 0.33。我们发现lai的中心(0.61)和地点(0.50)差异的标准差都非常大,在对性别、民族和种族进行调整后仍然很大。对于氯氮平处方,位点差异极大(0.92),而枢纽差异(0.37)不显著。结论:在美国CSC项目中,LAIs和氯氮平的药理学治疗实践变化很大。通过实施这些循证实践策略,更高的采用率和患者覆盖率可能会减少持续阳性症状、精神病复发和早期精神病患者住院治疗的频繁发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书